It's about of a thin line between two different cultures, differences on the level of huge masses of people going to different directons with different methods. Thinking about this problem while having in mind a muslim as a human being will lead you to failure most likely so there's no point in hating each other but to find a way out of this.

Dear LCPDFR staff,

 

I am surprised to see that you are supporting the heinous act that took place in Paris today by attacking my freedom of speech just like these terrorists did.

 

In no way I was targeting any ethnic group nor any religion whatsoever. My picture was directly to and only to terrorists no matter what their races are.

I'm fully understanding that this is a private website and their owners are free to regulate the content the way it pleases them.

 

Still I was expecting more support from the staff of a website that I believed was pro Law Enforcement. Do I need to remind you that two officers lost their live today protecting our freedom of speech?

 

In the future please at least have the decency to either contact me via private message or directly in the incriminated thread to discuss the matter.

 

Regards,

T.

 

 

EDIT. didnt knew about the no meme policy. My bad, apologies, still

 

2. Freedom of speech does not exist on forums, nor does it apply.

 

Edited January 7, 201511 yr by AC-Teddy

Teddy, we do not allow memes. You are free to voice your opinion in your own words, via text.

I am surprised to see that you are supporting the heinous act that took place in Paris today by attacking my freedom of speech just like these terrorists did.

1. We're not supporting these crimes. That's a hideous thing to say. 

2. Freedom of speech does not exist on forums, nor does it apply. We have the no-meme guideline, and we expect it to be followed. 

 

Comparing us to terrorists is quite low. I apologize for not informing you regarding the hiding of your meme, but it is what it is now. I hope you understand. 

Here is a manifestation of support in Marseille, a few kilometers away from where I live.

 

My friend who is a cop, got wounded at the shoulder, he was one of the first to arrive after the execution of that policeman

I'm a muslim, let the hate begin.

 

 

~Not all muslims are terrorist~ 

 

These "Muslims" that killed those people are not true muslims.

 

You can hate or whatever but I don't care less, you won't see me going about with an AK 47.

 

What do you mean those people are not "true muslims"? These Muslims are truly, to the best of their ability, obeying the specific orders of the Quran. Don't even contest this, we all know the Quran in multiple parts calls for violence upon non-believers for the sake of spreading Islam. 

 

And before you call me racist, don't. Because I'm not. I don't hate Islam, I hate the fundamentalism that is being interpreted by certain Muslims.

 

Also, Anybody better read this whole thing before they consider arguing. 

 

While it is well known that the majority of Muslims don't go around taking the Quran literally, which would imply Jihad and Sharia, upon every Western country and elsewhere, there is a small minority of Muslims who do take this religion literally, and seriously, and make the vast majority of modern, peaceful Muslims look bad. Fundamentalism, is the basis behind every "Terrorist" group we have come to known, whether it be from Al-Qaeda, Al-Shabaab, or ISIS. This fundamentalism destroys the reputation of Islam, and explains why Europe is having so much tension between Islams especially in the UK, France, and Germany. 

 

But the problem here, as mentioned, fundamentalism. When religions expand and change and adapt, as anything does in this day of age, people get nervous, and panic. This panic is fundamentalism, in which to take everything written completely literally. Honestly, these are true Muslims, what's more true than literal interpretation? 

 

With that said, anybody with a sane mind and rational thinking process knows that the religion of Islam in this day of age is a religion of peace, and not violence. While these people may be absolute cowards for doing what they did, and will do again, you can not call them "not true muslims" because that is what fundamentalism is, and what the religion of Islam states, but in no way is what the religion is about, nor any religion for that matter. 

 

Fundamentalism is a problem and a threat to the Western World as it expands, due to panic and conservatism. I'd hate to see a discrimination war against Islam because of the actions a few think it is their duty to do. 

What do you mean those people are not "true muslims"? These Muslims are truly, to the best of their ability, obeying the specific orders of the Quran. Don't even contest this, we all know the Quran in multiple parts calls for violence upon non-believers for the sake of spreading Islam. 

 

And before you call me racist, don't. Because I'm not. I don't hate Islam, I hate the fundamentalism that is being interpreted by certain Muslims.

 

Also, Anybody better read this whole thing before they consider arguing. 

 

While it is well known that the majority of Muslims don't go around taking the Quran literally, which would imply Jihad and Sharia, upon every Western country and elsewhere, there is a small minority of Muslims who do take this religion literally, and seriously, and make the vast majority of modern, peaceful Muslims look bad. Fundamentalism, is the basis behind every "Terrorist" group we have come to known, whether it be from Al-Qaeda, Al-Shabaab, or ISIS. This fundamentalism destroys the reputation of Islam, and explains why Europe is having so much tension between Islams especially in the UK, France, and Germany. 

 

But the problem here, as mentioned, fundamentalism. When religions expand and change and adapt, as anything does in this day of age, people get nervous, and panic. This panic is fundamentalism, in which to take everything written completely literally. Honestly, these are true Muslims, what's more true than literal interpretation? 

 

With that said, anybody with a sane mind and rational thinking process knows that the religion of Islam in this day of age is a religion of peace, and not violence. While these people may be absolute cowards for doing what they did, and will do again, you can not call them "not true muslims" because that is what fundamentalism is, and what the religion of Islam states, but in no way is what the religion is about, nor any religion for that matter. 

 

Fundamentalism is a problem and a threat to the Western World as it expands, due to panic and conservatism. I'd hate to see a discrimination war against Islam because of the actions a few think it is their duty to do. 

I totally agree, 

All I meant is those who kill are not muslims. I read the Qur'an a 3 times. I know it don't say kill others because that is what it's not about.

 

I just hate to see the media making all this bullshit up and those terrorist making us muslims who are innocent look bad. It's pathetic and it's sad that if I do go outside I WILL have to hide my religion for safety purposes. 

 

I had to battle it out with a shit-hole who started just because I am a muslim. Smh.

Edited January 7, 201511 yr by IIRezaulII

Enough is enough. How about we try a little 'eye for an eye' tactic? no mercy, put these barbaric pirates down before they destroy our way of life.

First Canada, then Australia, now France who is going to be next, god damn it this is starting to get bad. 

I'm a muslim, let the hate begin.

 

 

~Not all muslims are terrorist~ 

 

These "Muslims" that killed those people are not true muslims.

 

You can hate or whatever but I don't care less, you won't see me going about with an AK 47.

 

If i recall, this extremists have been around for a long time and have always been considered the outcast of islam correct?

What do you mean those people are not "true muslims"? These Muslims are truly, to the best of their ability, obeying the specific orders of the Quran. Don't even contest this, we all know the Quran in multiple parts calls for violence upon non-believers for the sake of spreading Islam. 

 

And before you call me racist, don't. Because I'm not. I don't hate Islam, I hate the fundamentalism that is being interpreted by certain Muslims.

 

Also, Anybody better read this whole thing before they consider arguing. 

 

While it is well known that the majority of Muslims don't go around taking the Quran literally, which would imply Jihad and Sharia, upon every Western country and elsewhere, there is a small minority of Muslims who do take this religion literally, and seriously, and make the vast majority of modern, peaceful Muslims look bad. Fundamentalism, is the basis behind every "Terrorist" group we have come to known, whether it be from Al-Qaeda, Al-Shabaab, or ISIS. This fundamentalism destroys the reputation of Islam, and explains why Europe is having so much tension between Islams especially in the UK, France, and Germany. 

 

But the problem here, as mentioned, fundamentalism. When religions expand and change and adapt, as anything does in this day of age, people get nervous, and panic. This panic is fundamentalism, in which to take everything written completely literally. Honestly, these are true Muslims, what's more true than literal interpretation? 

 

With that said, anybody with a sane mind and rational thinking process knows that the religion of Islam in this day of age is a religion of peace, and not violence. While these people may be absolute cowards for doing what they did, and will do again, you can not call them "not true muslims" because that is what fundamentalism is, and what the religion of Islam states, but in no way is what the religion is about, nor any religion for that matter. 

 

Fundamentalism is a problem and a threat to the Western World as it expands, due to panic and conservatism. I'd hate to see a discrimination war against Islam because of the actions a few think it is their duty to do. 

 

But isn't it the same for the bible aswell, does the bible, it states that all who do not believe in the lord will be punished severely aka DEATH.

 

Edited January 7, 201511 yr by Takao

If i recall, this extremists have been around for a long time and have always been considered the outcast of islam correct?

 

But isn't it the same for the bible aswell, does the bible, it states that all who do not believe in the lord will be punished severely aka DEATH.

 

Correct, these extremists has always put a bad name in Muslims. It's disgraceful. 

R.I.P. to the 12 that lost their lives today. It was a tragic thing to hear about this morning. That video just shows that the humanity in some people was never there to begin with. It seemed as if he was begging for mercy and the guy never even looked at him when he shot him point blank. He was running around like he had just tagged someone in paintball or lazertag. These things make me just really upset about the way people live and how the world is running. Where is the justice, what causes are helped when people are killed?

Here's food for thought as I watch CNN analyze this. Had those police officers been armed, maybe this could have been prevented, or at least stopped from escaping.

Looks like they got' em!

 

http://www.liberation.fr/societe/2015/01/07/le-siege-de-charlie-hebo-vise-par-des-tirs_1175326

 

Have no idea what's said here but our newspapers report that one perp down, two are arrested. If that's true I salute the French police. Finish an operation like that with an arrest to bring those bastards to the public justice - outstanding. 

If i recall, this extremists have been around for a long time and have always been considered the outcast of islam correct?

 

But isn't it the same for the bible aswell, does the bible, it states that all who do not believe in the lord will be punished severely aka DEATH.

 

Oh absolutely, the Catholic Church alone has been known for violence, funding Hitler in WWII, Inquisition, Middle Ages War in Europe, Crusades, ect. 

 

I wasn't saying Mulims were the only violent religion, because they're not. But the amount of extremist fundamentalists is much higher than other religions today. 

If i recall, this extremists have been around for a long time and have always been considered the outcast of islam correct?

 

But isn't it the same for the bible aswell, does the bible, it states that all who do not believe in the lord will be punished severely aka DEATH.

 

Just like the top comments says.. The Old Covenant does not apply to New Covenant Christians.

Just like the top comments says.. The Old Covenant does not apply to New Covenant Christians.

 

yes but they mix both in together.

Oh absolutely, the Catholic Church alone has been known for violence, funding Hitler in WWII, Inquisition, Middle Ages War in Europe, Crusades, ect. 

 

I wasn't saying Mulims were the only violent religion, because they're not. But the amount of extremist fundamentalists is much higher than other religions today. 

 

i mean believe it or not but we in the west also have extremists, but they do not portray themselves out alot, but for example the KKK. They use the bible to portray any other ethnicity other than their own (caucasian) superior to others, and attack others, which is a crime and can be considered a terror act. The Westboro baptist church is another but they show it in a different way (i don't wanna get into details of westboro),but in the middle east, its a much more...unique situation, the way that they portray in the middle east is one that promotes corporations to get loads of money by killing people literally, what are we the tax payers doing, paying PMC so they make products. For example the F-35, to kill more people (not saying its innocent or guilty people) but yeah.

Edited January 8, 201511 yr by Takao

Here's food for thought as I watch CNN analyze this. Had those police officers been armed, maybe this could have been prevented, or at least stopped from escaping.

I'm pretty sure Paris police are armed. A survey of police weapons by the Library of Congress says that French national police and gendarmes are required to be armed on duty. French municipal police aren't all armed, but Paris doesn't have municipal police (it's patrolled by national police). Both officers who died were national police, so armed.

So yeah. Armed police wouldn't prevent it because it didn't prevent it.

I'm pretty sure Paris police are armed. A survey of police weapons by the Library of Congress says that French national police and gendarmes are required to be armed on duty. French municipal police aren't all armed, but Paris doesn't have municipal police (it's patrolled by national police). Both officers who died were national police, so armed.

So yeah. Armed police wouldn't prevent it because it didn't prevent it.

Please read the reports. They clearly stated the officers killed were unarmed.