c13

No. Because emergency responses with lights and sirens mean that there is either serious risk of immediate injury or some one already seriously injured, and quite frankly, I don't trust people who had just got their driver's license to drive fast.

It automatically says the name of the user reading it.

Like I said, the majority of the people don't care about foreign espionage, and happily lap up the lie told by the politicians and the media that it is about preventing terrorism. The threats against us stem from our constant involvement in other's business since WW2. One example is Iran. Many people that are uninformed think that out of random, they attacked the embassy in 1979 and hated us for our freedoms. What is almost never talked about is that in the 1950's, the CIA led a coup that overthrew the democratically elected president of that country and replaced him with a Pro-US dictator. While there is no way to go back in time and prevent these actions, creating more enemies won't do anything to fix it. But as I've been trying to get people do for the past page, name one terrorist attack the NSA prevented. If they were effective at all, then there might be a leg to stand on for people supporting the suspension of the Constitution.

But every time a supporter in government is questioned about the NSA, their answer isn't "we want to spy on foreign governments." It's a response designed to tug on the heartstrings of America by saying "we want to prevent another 9/11." A majority of the civilians that support the NSA don't support it to spy on Merkel's office, they support it to spy on terrorists, which it has done a piss poor job of doing. This argument is always brought up, and it is really quite ridiculous. Should an assault be ignored, simply because it hasn't been turned into a murder yet? Should a DUI be ignored, simply because the driver hasn't crashed into anyone yet? Should a growing problem of a government overreach of power be ignored, simply because they haven't started killing political dissidents yet? Regardless of whether you like Obama or the next president more, the ultimate problem is that these tools exist and they can easily be used for sinister purposes.

And yet, Obama can't cite one single time where it has stopped an attack, and he's much more privy to information than anyone on this site. My facts were already shown in links, while you have provided none. Yeah, why would a government, an entity composed entirely of humans who like to control other humans, want to give itself more power? I simply took the criteria out of a leaked document from a joint federal/local anti-terrorism task force. I'm sorry that that blows over your head and challenges your belief system so much. Also, this would be known as argumentum ad absurdinum. You can't counter any of the points I brought up, so you had to make it seem like my points are ridiculous.

After seeing your edit, anyone who supports a party other than Democrat or Republican is considered by the US Government to be a domestic terrorist, according to the leaked "Modern Militia Movement" papers from the Missouri Information Analysis Center (Joint Federal/State task force). That means 7 million people at least are considered terrorists, for simply exercising their first amendment right.

No matter how much people want to sugar coat the NSA with assisting in the prevention of not even one terrorism act (Despite Operation Echelon being in existence since the end of WW2), it doesn't change the fact that treason has and is continuing to be committed. For those that don't know, Operation Echelon was an agreement between spy agencies in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the United Kingdom and the United States after WW2. They agreed to spy on each others citizens to bypass domestic spying laws. A rogue government is a much more dangerous threat to our freedom than a nut who could only get supplied by the FBI. But the NSA hasn't prevented a single attack since the creation of similar programs just after World War 2.

Again, why should the government that is supposed to enforce laws against the people get a free pass when breaking the Supreme Law of the Land?

For the hat, just use this: '?do=embed' frameborder='0' data-embedContent>>. The ped models should be the same, so the hat included in that file should fit just fine. But you might have to retexture it depending on your taste.

For this to work, the pushbar model has to be lacking a texture. If the car isn't designed to work like that (the author almost always says if it is), the pushbar will still appear as a plain color, but without any other textures (logos, different colors).

MODERATOR NOTICE Moved to GTA 4 Support Requests

Because it's highly hypocritical for the government that is supposed to carry out the law to break the "supreme law of the land."

"Conversion" means that some one else has already made the model for a game, but it is being converted to a different game.

You really won't get much support if you use this thread for venting remotely related views.

-Using cash-Bad credit/Doesn't want to deal with bills -Changing appearance-People change styles -Multiple similar guns-Competition shooters like to have several guns setup the same so that if one goes down, they can use another one. As an example, some people that shoot High Power use an AR-15 in .223 caliber as their competition gun. However, they may have another one at every competition in case of a major issue so they can continue shooting. High Power shooters that can't afford ammo may also have another AR-15 in .22 caliber (much cheaper ammo) for practice. Then they may have another AR-15 in 5.56 caliber setup for home defense, one set up for long range target shooting with a scope, an AR-15 in .300 blackout for use with a suppressor, various other oddball AR-15 calibers, and NFA items like Short Barreled Rifles that are AR-15s. That could easily make multiple guns of the same style, and that's not even going into families that give their kids guns (under lock and key of course). There are also the people who are just collectors. I know a guy who at one point had a goal to collect an AK-47 from every country they are manufactured in. It was 43 at the time, and as the countries manufacturing them kept growing, he gave up at a higher number than his original goal. Traveling-Better deals and/or liking the people at that shop better. And traveling also counted for shooting, so going to a national shooting competition makes some one a terrorist. -Anti-US With the laws being proposed, almost every single one of the people in the shop I worked at were anti-US. And as I already pointed out in this thread, not liking Republican or Democrat candidates makes the government consider people to be potential terrorists.

And more reasons why you might be a terrorist: -Use cash -Change Hair Color/Shave -Buying more than 2 guns that are similar (because people don't not want to stay with a gun they're familiar with) -Illogical distance to shoot/buy a gun, despite not defining what that distance is -Anti-US I can confirm this list is authentic because I saw an FBI agent give this to the gun shop I was at.

Considering that the Missouri Information Analysis Center (Federal and State anti-terrorism task force) called anyone who supports a political party that isn't Republican or Democrat a potential violent terrorist militia member, most of the people in this thread are probably labeled terrorists some where by some government agency. Third party candidates received around 1.8 million votes in the last election, of an estimated 130 million voters. That means the US Government considers at least 7 million people in the United States to be terrorists, for simply voting for their preferred candidate. I'm sure that number is significantly higher when adding in all the other ridiculous reasons a government agency is bound to come up with. And yet, there is no proof that Assad used Chemical weapons. The only people who stood to gain from a chemical weapon attack were the Al-Qaeda operatives currently being supported by the US and NATO in Syria, and the war profiteers of course.