Albo1125

Hehe. Personally, the only thing I'd like to see changed is having the 'reply' feature brought back (it disappeared a few weeks ago during a site update). Apart from that, I'm pretty happy with the review system. While I do get the occasional 'it doesn't work 1 star' review on my files, my reports usually get dealt with pretty swiftly by the moderation team. A rule I'd personally like to see added is that suggestions for future updates must not be posted in a review. A review should not be used to suggest features, i.e. "I'll give 5 stars if you add feature x, now only 2 stars because I really want that". Reviews that are posted where the author complain about a lack of features when the feature is actually already included in the file (e.g. "Why can't I turn ambient event messages off in Traffic Policer? 3 stars") should be removed too as it only goes to show the author hasn't used your work (indepthly enough). Reviews are purely subjective, and their ratings cannot necessarily be compared across different modifications. As an example, someone recently reviewed Traffic Policer as 4 stars because he didn't "like the way the speed radar zone looked". The same person then reviewed Pursuit Callouts 5 stars for "the hard work of the author and how fun it is to play". The reason for this is that currently most review authors see the base for giving a rating as the modification itself, not how it compares to others' work. It is therefore relatively common to see, say a simple text edit mod that took 5 minutes to create get 5 star ratings, while an extremely complex mod that may have a few tiny issues and took tens of hours to create gets less than that. The only way to solve this would be for the site staff to draft guidelines of how many stars to give for what kind of work. I personally wouldn't advocate such a system. The way it works now is that mods that are good (i.e. have little to no issues) get higher ratings than mods that may have some more issues, but took far more effort to make and are much more powerful. This is good in the sense that a user gets a good impression of the problems he may face when downloading and installing a modification. As for trolls, as a script modification author I can say that I haven't really encountered them in any alarming quantity yet. If the occasional one does come along and post something spiteful, a simple report is usually enough to deal with the matter. At the end of the day, though, the rating system should only be a small side thing for mod authors. Worrying about it is just about the last thing you should be doing, and I personally really wouldn't mind if it's just the 4 stars appearing next to my work rather than 5 (so long as this is not due to the reasons I mentioned at the beginning of this book post). As long as you enjoy creating the modifications you put out and most of the people enjoy it to some degree, I'm perfectly happy.

Can confirm this. First noticed the issue this afternoon (9 hours ago). Using Google Chrome 52.0.2743.116 m

You need to make sure Windows Media Player is installed and enabled on your computer.