c13

He'd use the money to continually buy new ones, refusing to accept that the problem is Apple itself.

So when are you going to make a thread on the knockout game?

Do you think you could integrate the Abraxas K-9 script in a future version? I would think that the only major change that would have to be done is making an exception in the ped intelligence class for the default K-9 model, since as of now, the dog tends to run away when a pursuit is going on.

Something I just found out that proves yet another talking point wrong is that the dispatch audio Anonymous hacked and released was from St. Louis County Police, not Ferguson police who have their own frequency. For those wondering what that talking point is, people are claiming based on the St. Louis County Police dispatch tapes that the shooting was never called in by Darren Wilson, when the tapes show St. Louis County Police informing their officers of what was going on in Ferguson over an hour later. And on the video claiming to show Wilson pacing around, that woman claims it took her 30 seconds to get her phone and start taking video from the time the shots were fired. Does anyone here really believe police tape would be up within 30 seconds of a police shooting?

It happens at about 6:30 in the video, but it's a background conversation

Of course he wouldn't publicly admit to reporting the crime. In case you don't recall, a Quik Trip was burned down when the rioters thought Brown was there earlier that day. And in case you didn't watch the video, he casually walked out of the store after grabbing some one by the throat and throwing him into a display rack.

Another shooting in St. Louis. Police shot a 23 year old black male carrying a knife who just robbed a convenience store, and protesters are descending on it. http://fox2now.com/2014/08/19/officer-involved-shooting-in-north-st-louis-2/ The problem is that many of the witnesses who claim to have seen it and came out publicly claim that Brown was shot in the back and then turned around. And I have a major problem with trusting witnesses when the star witness just robbed a store with Brown. Also, I doubt the cop in that video was Wilson, but I would like to see it anyways.

There's one in this pack: '?do=embed' frameborder='0' data-embedContent>>

2 civilians were shot tonight with no shots fired by police. One was shot in the hand and the other had to be extracted in an armored vehicle. Conditions unknown

At about 2:45:30 in this video, there was multiple shots fired directly at the police.

Feed of the RIOT channels:http://www.ustream.tv/channel/st-louis-county-police-scanner, curfew will most likely be enforced in 5 minutes

I'm sure he would have indicated if the cop had stood over Brown and pointed his gun down at a 90 degree angle. Or, based on other accounts that have not been debunked, that would mean that Brown was charging forward with his head lowered and pointing towards the officer.

But for an angle from the top of the head into the collarbone, the cop would've had to have been directly over Brown. None of the witnesses have said Wilson was that close.

The preliminary results of an autopsy performed by Dr Michael Baden, who did an additional autopsy at the request of the family, have just been released. According to the report, Michael Brown was shot 6 times, with all the entrance wounds at the front of his body. This pokes a major hole in the witness accounts saying Brown was shot in the back running. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/18/us/michael-brown-autopsy-shows-he-was-shot-at-least-6-times.html Here is an interesting quote from it that could support both sides of the story:

Before the background conversation in the video was widely known, a supposed friend of the wife of Darren Wilson (the cop who shot Brown) called into a radio show and gave a similar story, that she said Wilson's wife told her:

From Wikipedia on the Rodney King Riots:

Curfew now in effect, Midnight to 5 AM http://www.kmov.com/news/national/Governor-declares-State-of-Emergency-curfew-in-Ferguson-271530971.html

The only way to stop a protest once it turns violent is overwhelming force. That's something that has happened throughout history, and there has been no end to violent protests outside of force. Before anything is said, that's not to say that all protests turn violent and should be crushed with force. When the Rodney King riots went unchecked, 53 people died, over 2000 were injured and over $1 billion in property damage was caused. For the most part, the police sat back and did nothing at the beginning, letting it quickly spark into something that required 13,000 military personnel to stop. And it isn't a police state. A police state would have the media censoring these events and anyone speaking out against them getting shot or disappearing. It's been the exact opposite. This has nothing to do with Trayvon Martin or George Zimmerman. The police responded to growing demonstrations that resulted in the Quik Trip being looted and burned down. Next, the Quik Trip didn't magically catch fire. Protesters set it on fire. The car wash didn't magically catch on fire Wednesday night. Protestors threw molotov cocktails on it. Some looters were armed with firearms. And you make it sound more dramatic than it was. Police warned people for over an hour to leave the street, which they were in, because it's against the law to obstruct traffic. No civilians were shot with any sort of lethal round, which you seem to be implying. Controlling a riot isn't against international law by the way. Or maybe, with an age of mass communication, things like this become reported more, more people rush to judgement before letting facts or an investigation get in their way, and more people get committed to a cause. This would mean that more large scale events requiring an escalated police force would happen, resulting in more false accusations of a police state. This has nothing to do with the NDAA. So what if they look like military personnel? Airsofters look that way too. That doesn't make police military any more than airsofters. Every single item the police have that is described as militarization, short of flashbangs, tear gas, full auto weapons made past 1986, high intensity lasers and Lenco Bearcats/MRAPs are available to civilians. Of course police will occupy an area. That tends to happen after repeated nights of looting. "GI Joe" isn't going to show up for one person. In case you haven't seen any footage yet, there are hundreds of people looting. One person isn't going to stop that. And these aren't necessarily protests. Protests are organized. Protests have a leader. Protests don't result in violence. Protests especially don't result in local businesses being looted and burned down. So what should happen when people start looting? Should the police do what the Missouri Highway Patrol tried last night, holding hands and singing Kumbaya? I'll give you a hint how it turned out. While the St. Louis County Police was ordered to have its 200 riot officers stand down by the Highway Patrol that had taken charge, the Highway Patrol calmly drove by the looters, not doing anything. In that time period, 5 businesses were looted, 1 person was shot and store owners had to show up with their own guns to chase off the CRIMINALS on their property. So how long should looters go unpunished? How long should they get free reign to destroy peoples' livelihoods? Your hypothetical scenario is not related to the discussion at hand, but I'll entertain it. If people in my neighborhood started burning down businesses and looting stores, then there would be a police response. I'm capable of understanding that actions have consequences. This is not about gun control. Again, using camo and equipment mostly available to civilians isn't a military force. How exactly does attempting to control people before they burn down businesses using less-lethal means equate to China or Russia? Those countries would probably shoot the looters.

Considering that standards for the Pennsylvania State Police are this pathetic and still there are discrimination suits over it, it really is no surprise: http://www.gettysburg.k12.pa.us/webpages/p29386/career_pathways.cfm?subpage=889574

Because the video was minutes after the shooting

The problem with ranks is that for it to be realistic, it would not be action packed. Supervisors/Sergeants/Lieutenants/Police Chiefs don't handle calls in larger departments, they direct what goes on.