LMS

Very nice idea, thanks! I have close friends in Houston, who luckily are doing okay so far, but their surrounding neighborhoods have been heavily affected.. Everyone stay safe out there!

Thanks for letting us know, I've reported it and hope they will kick the advertiser responsible for this ad soon.

We have created a collection of hardware setups for different budgets/needs to run LSPDFR due to the amount of threads where people ask for hardware recommendations. This is by no means the one and only setup for LSPDFR but rather a reference guide to use when looking for a new build to run LSPDFR. You're still more than welcome to create new topics and ask for help and/or debate our picks. Hardware recommendations on Amazon: http://lcpd.fr/amazon Please find the guide here (old): Hardware recommendations for LSPDFR

We've been busy working on patterns per vehicle (no longer limited to per model) as well as giving you the ability to change them at runtime. Soon in RAGE Plugin Hook. Some background info: http://blog.lms-dev.com/reverse-engineering/v-dynamically-adding-carcols/

Just as you didn't elect the delegates of the county next to yours. Why is it such a big deal when it comes to countries/nations, but no within a country? I mean, let's be real, "the same country", what does it mean at the end of the day? One could have drawn the border on the map 100 km to the east and then you would accept the result of those people there because magically they are now in your country? In the 21st century I'm not a huge fan of the idea of nationalism and protecting "countries". We're all citizens of the world, no matter where you were born. And the fact that someone votes against something you support shouldn't be viewed differently whether they are from your "country" or an EU-country imo. @Ben: I'm not sure if military spending is a good example here, as there is no such thing as a European Army so it's hard to say Britain did it to secure EU countries. It might have done so for NATO countries, but that's a different story. Then again, if one follows your thought and argues that since the UK spends more money protecting EU countries, wouldn't be the logical consequence working on establishing an european force to evenly make everyone pay for it? How does it help if the UK goes back into a "locked-down" state, where it still has to pay all the military stuff? I don't think it should always be about the benefits of yourself, but about progressing as a whole, in this case as Europeans. And everyone has to make a sacrifice or two for that.

Where is the difference to state level though? In a country, 90% of the people (or delegates) could also vote for something that would only affect one state/county or a minority. It's always the same story, no matter the level.

I'm really shocked that so many people in here only seem to see the bad things about the EU. From "I read that..." to "I heard..." there is little substance and a lot of speculation involved. Basically all the "unique interpretations" anti-EU parties like to mention. It's easy to be against something. I don't even understand how someone can actually dislike the idea of entering a close relationships with countries nearby. People in Europe have a lot in common and as such it only makes sense to work on a supranational way of interacting. Where is the benefit of 20+ countries each doing their very own thing? It doesn't help anyone. Businesses have to deal with a lot of different laws and rules, same for people. Cutting red tape is important. We live in a connected world where together as a people we are strong. We should be facing the problems of the world together and not alone. And it's not just about free trade withouts tariff barries and customs within the EU. Thanks to the power of the EU (~20% of global economy) it opens up a lot of other market and great deals for all of its members, deals they are not able to negotiate on their own. The UK in particular also gets a lot of money from EU countries via FDI, notable 47% of all FDIs in 2011 - worth $1.2 trillion. While you guys spent less than 0.5% of your GDP for EU related costs. You can not only move easily across the EU, but you can also work in every country, which is a great thing on its own. You also enjoy lower mobile phone charges, credit card fees or proper compensation when flights are delayed or cancelled. You can study abroad to avoid the old-fashioned idea of England that studying should be expensive (great way to keep the poor people stupid or makes the banks rich) and attend an University in a country that believes that education is a right, not a privilege (seriously, take Eton College for example, not affordable by any normal guy yet it produced 19 prime ministers. Nepotism at its best). It also helps fighting criminals, as extraditing criminals criminals wanted in other EU countries or hiding from UK law in other EU countries is much easier. I think immigration is a plausible reason to vote against the European Union. It's not because immigrants are bad and all, it's because we are in the European Union which basically means we are required to let them come in to the country, and we are a small enough country as it is, with not enough jobs, not enough money and yet we aren't allowed to slim down the amount of people that come to this country, or get the ones who have skills that can contribute to this country. @Ben No, it's because other members of the European Union have this massive burden and as part of a union, helping each other is a thing. So that's why you are "required" to take a few immigrants so the countries in the south don't have to deal with everything on their own. Imagine it the other way round: Wouldn't it be nice of Italy and Greece to take refugees arriving at your coasts so you don't have to take of them on your own? Instead we get stuck with thousands of people travelling across Europe and ending up here in the United Kingdom because English is the language most of them know the basics of, and thus they settle down here. The problem with this is, people are called racists for saying "I'm genuinely scared there won't be many jobs left" and that's just idiotic, its a logical thing to think, and it's arrogant that people are called racist for merely being concerned at the mass-immigration. This is just completey wrong. The UK gets 60! Asylum applications per 100,000 local population (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-34131911) compared to e.g. Hungary (1800), Sweden (1667) or Germany (587). This is a joke and something the Uk can easily cope with. And thinking that immigrants taking away jobs is a logical thing is absolutely ridiculous. If a company really decides to hire someone barely speaking your language with a hard to verify degree instead of an UK resident, well I think the UK resident is the problem. How can you believe someone like that is able to compete? Of course Trump supported Leave, leaving the EU opens up so many opportunities for the UK to trade with whoever they want without the permission of the EU. Thats good for his own Business as well as business from China and the rest of Asia. @officerAMR Yeah, I can totally imagine the strong position of the UK negotiating with China. Let me remind you that the economy of the UK is a joke compared to China (GDP PPP 20,800,000 vs 2,700,00 int$) while the EU has around 19,000,000. Why do you believe that you will get a better deal in said situation? When in history was it ever useful to be small and unimportant when negotiating terms? I'd also question the fact that the uk had to ask for the EU's permission to do business with whatever country they want.

I appreciate your suggestion and I also saw it on the repo, but please don't expect this happening anytime soon. My current schedule doesn't really allow any development (not that this is a huge change, but generally).

I assume it's due to obfuscation, I will have a closer look.

Yes, and it does work fine for me on VS 2015. I created a new project, referenced the DLL and called a function to make sure it works. Does VS give any log output?

Okay I see, I will try it myself this weekend and report back. In case I forget, don't hesitate to tag me again in a few days.

Could you elaborate on that, i.e. show an error log? Or doesn't it show any functions at all?

You can register a dummy callout with Always as probability and then in your code decide whether or not to start that callout. You could also use the dummy to launch other callouts to have more control.

Yep, Cyan is correct on this one. Note that internally, we mainly use this flag to allow peds that are not cops per relationship group or model to be recognized as cops by LSPDFR. We don't really use it to generally determine if a ped is a cop.

Can you confirm it reports true for the cop while he is alive and reports false the second he dies?

The only parts I unit test are things like networking, IO, etc. I don't really unit test any game-related calls. The game's DRM is not a big fan of debugging. For some reason only native code debugging works well (granted you strip the anti-debug checks). As for .NET, I only got it working via WinDbg with SOS loaded.

Sehr schöne und ausführliche Zusammenstellung!

Sieht so aus, als ob deine Einstellungen (vermutlich die .ini) Probleme macht. BItte den Inhalt hier posten, damit ich versuchen kann, es lokal zu reproduzieren. Bei dir sollte es genügen sie einmal zu löschen.

Largely depends on when you need it. I don't think we'll roll out a patch in the near future, so adding your own logic might be the best idea for now. Having an already created ped respond as backup should work. I'm not so sure whether we will allow setting the response type via that call though - a lot of stuff is set up on cop creation based on the response type, so this might cause issues.

It's rather due to missing documentation in this case. The backup call will just dispatch the unit like a transport unit, but there is no further logic added. I can imagine that it would be useful if it did though, so I will extend what the API call does for this specific case a little bit. Right now it just passes the call to our internal backup manager, which does nothing more than dispatching the unit. The suspect transportation logic is in another class and also executes this call, but then makes use of the unit returned. That's why there is no AI logic happening for you.

This is how it works for the vest selected by the player in the character selection, but I guess for complete control a flag that can be set via API would be the best option. Especially when the vest is added when LSPDFR has already recognized the ped.

We had it in LCPDFR and it will return, but I can't say when.