unitedOrange66

This is an unwarranted assumption that automatically assumes users who are experiencing performance drops have one or more other poorly coded, memory-consuming scripts/plugins installed. I'm certain with only XScanner/XPU, and LSPDFR.dll running, there will be no noticeable FPS drop. In fact, this is true for all RPH/LSPDFR plugins. But it is less than practical in real-life scenarios, the majority of LSPDFR players will have at least one to two callout packs installed with a few other "immersive" plugins. Thus, running with only a particular plugin(XScanner) cannot be the sole factor in determining the performance-related issues of a plugin. Another factor that must be taken into account when determining whether or not a plugin is at fault for performance drop is - what happens if we add it to the existing plugins where the average FPS is fairly high. In other words, does it work well with other plugins without bringing down performance? So in elevating whether or not "this is related to XScanner," there are two critical questions that must be answered: One, why do users experience a significant decrease in performance only when adding XScanner to their existing plugin combination, whereas under the same testing condition, without changing the combination of the plugins, but removing XScanner comprehended the dropped performance? Two, why do popular plugins such as "Grammar Police," "Callout Interface" regardless of running with or without other plugins, the performance drops are minimal? From multiple users' feedback here in the comment section, the answer to these questions is quite obvious.