DivineHustle

As usual, you aren't fully understanding the concept. The United States welcomes legal immigration. We welcome those willing to come here to work, contribute to society, and not leech off of government benefits. We DON'T welcome those who decide to hop the border, live for free, and commit crime. Illegal immigration and legal immigration are two separate things. Don't get them confused, because it makes you look ignorant.

If you were in America, you'd probably be shot down for saying that, or beaten. This is as ignorant as it can get, and it's not surprising when it comes from a foreigner. You could have always, you know, looked it up... http://www.faithdeployed.com/2011/06/what-does-the-u-s-flag-really-mean/ That's not hatred, it's truth.

This is not only retarded and contradictory, but complete fucking bull shit. You'd think that the American flag would actually represent cultural diversity, equality, freedom, and civil rights. To ban a flag that is supposed to represent these, for these reasons doesn't make any sense. Then again this isn't surprising. California is a well-known left-wing paradise when it comes to politics. Liberal indoctrination has such a wonderful effect on American schools. Only in California would I expect something like this. Mass amounts of illegal aliens, celebrities that "advocate" to "save the world" while drowning in their own wealth, and "progressive" liberals. I'm sure America isn't surprised at this, I'm sure not. Especially in a state like California. If you have a problem with the American flag, get out of America. We don't want you here, nor do we need you here.

Well then science is wrong on that front. We can't say that something is scientifically impossible when it has already occurred. Planes hit the towers, and they fell. Science was wrong, because the towers still fell. There was no evidence of any explosives or C4.

Looks great, but the camera mod is very annoying.

Well either because they're liberals, don't know anything about 9/11, or they're stupid. This isn't an opinionated subject. It's fact that terrorists are responsible for 9/11.

You too, I agree that the US government knew an attack was imminent, or could happen. I just don't agree that the US was directly involved, as in placing bombs.

I hate the US government, plain and simple. However it doesn't take a substantial amount of evidence to know that 9/11 was cause by terrorists.. Foreigners hijacked planes and rammed towers.. not much science to it.

Right. This isn't what people are discussing. What people are arguing about is whether or not the government is directly responsible for 9/11, not if the government knew that 9/11 was possible. Everyone should agree that the US government had some sort of prior knowledge of 9/11, but the US government did not directly cause 9/11. Some are saying the government placed bombs and such, bull shit.

I don't understand how this is so difficult to understand. This isn't an opinionated subject, it's factual. 9/11 was not an inside job. There is nothing to debate here. It's fact.

It's not opinion, it's fact. That doesn't necessarily mean that the 9/11 attacks were an inside job. What if the French government was aware of the terrorist attacks a few months ago? Does that mean it was an inside job? No, there's always risk of a terrorist attack.

Are you looking for any specific department, such as NYPD or LAPD? Or are you looking for any mega pack? No offense man but typing each word with a capital letter gives me a headache.

I'd much prefer to just buy a nicer looking car. Trust me, it looks like shit in the US too. A good portion of Americans hate seeing modded cars. I can't stand seeing a street sedan with s spoiler. It just looks fucking retarded. The most I'd modify my car with is this: [imgur](' alt='' class='ipsImage' >)

It's also absolutely gorgeous.

Some of us are here because we have nothing better to do. Some because they enjoy it. Some to troll and cause a stir. Some for the sole purpose of downloading modifications. Why are you on LCPDFR?

LMAO. Kudos to you for defending your point on such hostile terms. That's something that I can respect, even if I disagree. Seriously. I'm surprised as well. Me being a Black American myself, this hasn't really become a racial issue. Why? Because a lot of Blacks believe it was the Black officer that shot him. Now the Black officer is being seen as some sort of "racial traitor" within our community. This type of news is very commonly discussed amongst the Black community. More commonly than people think. I've witnessed it on numerous occasions at multiple locations, it's just blatant ignorance, blunt assumptions of racism, and simply incorrect facts being thrown together to cause a fuss. If it was the Black officer that shot him, I can easily confirm that it will be a "Black on Black" issue, not an interracial issue.

Assumptions can be deadly my friend.

Erm... I'm sure law enforcement and the military are human beings lol. Never heard that before, not sure if that was an analogy or what. Either way, I don't know a single officer or military service member that would be OK with being referred to as an animal. I wasn't saying that your comment was retarded, I was making s general statement towards those who constantly insult law enforcement.

Anger can play a large role in the human thought process. The men and women who serve to protect our streets are no different then the men and women who serve to protect our country, the United States. Really angers me when people are ignorant enough to make blunt, retarded insults to law enforcement.

The problem here is the concept. You reach for an officers gun, you get blasted in the face repeatedly. I'd rather these officers shoot an unarmed homeless man than for the homeless man to get the gun and start shooting. I say good work to the officers. Promotion time.

I would rather my child do right because they KNOW it's right, not because they're afraid that I'll beat them. If you need to hit your child, you're a shit parent. I was never hit as a child, and I'd never hit my child. I know right from wrong because I was raised to know right from wrong, not because my mother would beat my ass.

If he wouldn't have fought, maybe he wouldn't have gotten shot. His fault for being stupid.

I would have still called them retarded. Doesn't matter to me. 1v20 I'd still call them retarded. I'm not the type of person that would sit there and let fucked up shit happen. I would stand up for those who remain quiet, I'd speak the truth. If everyone else wants to pussy out and become just another bystander that's fine, but that's not how I roll. I'm not going to remain quiet if something needs to be said. It's not about them being startled, it's about them remaining on scene causing a disturbance and disrupting police work. They clearly weren't startled, they were outraged and angry. Officers actually had to attend to the crowd with their nightsticks drawn. That's not startled, that's angry.

I'd like to start off by saying that the camera man is fucking retarded, and the rest of the idiots yelling like wild animals aren't any smarter and should shut the hell up and move on. Secondly, there is some sort of protocol I know of that doesn't require a suspect to be armed, to authorize the use of lethal force. I couldn't exactly see what was going on, but based on this video I think the shooting was justified. I also think that the LAPD could have waited a little bit longer to shoot, but again I can't clearly see what's happening. I also want to ask a question, and this is directed at anyone who reads it: As an officer, what would you have done here?

I live in Baltimore, you just don't walk around at night here lol.