Just got this, we are good for now.

Hi everyone!

A big hurrah to you!!!!! We

Hardly, There's a stop child porn act going on the floor soon, they'll paste SOPA or PIPA at the bottom of that bill, nobody's going to vote against a anti-child porn bill.

I see a problem coming with that. But I may have a solution, how about we KILL IT! KILL IT WITH FIRE!

That came out wrong. I always fail in some way, I meant we should kill SOPA and PIPA before it gets put on that list...just ignore me. :P

Edited January 20, 201214 yr by SharpCommand

But that would mean that you support child pornography, YOU SICK BASTARD.

IGNORE THIS POST. I FAILED. :dry:

Edited January 20, 201214 yr by SharpCommand

What NicolaiB is saying is that they can literally add SOPA and PIPA to this bill (or any other bill), and it would most likely pass due to the main topic of the bill. I don't think they even have to make it public knowledge that they did so (could be wrong here, idk).

They can literally paste it at the bottom in full, and nobody will vote against it, as the main focus will be on the anti child pornography, so it will pass in silence, fortunately quite a few seems to be aware of the possibility of this move.

The reason why SOPA and PIPA are being voted on is not because of stopping piracy, it is a way to censor the internet. Look at the Arab Spring, the internet was one of the biggest weapons against the tyrannical dictatorship (which the USA is quickly becoming) was the internet. These Bills force people to feed from the corrupt main stream media, which many people are leaving in favor of alternative news that doesn't lie. We have lost our right to protest offline with the just passed National Defense Authorization Act, which section 1021 allows the MILITARY to SECRETLY ARREST OR BLACKBAG U.S. CITIZENS WITHOUT DUE PROCESS ON OUR OWN HOME SOIL! I could go on about our freedom's being taken away, but any americans here remember that the only Presidential nominee that took time away from the campaign trail to work on getting section 1021 repealed, let alone outright protest it, and vote against SOPA/PIPA has been blatantly ignored by the media with probable voting fraud against him.

As I have said before, the US condems when the Egyptian state, when the Libyan state, and when the Syrian state commits these acts, but commits them just as well, it's amusing that a country that employs a two party state can be considered a democracy, especially considering how screwed the US will be if the next president will be a rep.

The US is run by the lobbies and those who controls the lobbyists, and that's very, very bad for the citizens.

This country is screwed if Ron Paul doesn't win. Obama is nothing but a Globalist puppet, and the entire government isn't any better. Obama protested NDAA then signed it on December 31, he launched more unconstitutional wars, calling them interventions, all after winning the Nobel Piece Prize. Forced vaccinations that have proven to not work are now being forced onto children, with CPS arresting informed parents who don't want their children to be killed off with vaccinations while pedophiles are working for the TSA. DHS has called veterans as well as people that have woken up the biggest threats to America (even though I consider America an idea that was killed long ago). There is a reason why gun sales were a record high in December, and one of the chief reasons of people being polled was they don't trust the government. We either begin a peaceful revolution with Ron Paul or we will be catapulted into a police state.

Edited for crappy grammar.

Edited January 20, 201214 yr by c13

Obama signed it to not look weak when his veto got overturned by the republican majority, Ron Paul has zero substance whatsoever, he's a republican, each and every one of them will make the US an even bigger joke.

Obama couldn't pass the majority of his politics due to the republicans having majority, things would be a lot different if the d's had majority.

The guy that made "whoop whoop, that's the sound of da police" made a valid point in the song "you can't have justice on stolen land"

The d's had majority of the Senate and House for the first 2 years when Obama took office, there was absolutely nothing accomplished then. Ron Paul has fought against the corporations for 30 years and is actually a Constitutionalist Libertarian, he is running as a repub just so he can wake up more people (Its nearly impossible to see news about third party candidates anyways). I support Ron paul on his foreign policy 100%, we need small government that follows the supreme law of the land, the constitution, and a strong national defense that isn't used as a world police, not to mention he is the only one with a plan to cut $900 billion in his first year in office, including lowering the presidential salary to only $35,000 a year while he already returns most of his money he earns from being a congressman.

Also, forgot to add that Romney and Obama have the exact same funders, same policies and one of the former heads of Bain Capitol is even one of Obama's advisors.

Edited January 20, 201214 yr by c13

Forced vaccinations that have proven to not work are now being forced onto children, with CPS arresting informed parents who don't want their children to be killed off with vaccinations

I have a problem with this: it's BS. Total BS. Name one single vaccination that is still administered and show a valid medical source that says it doesn't work.

I am confused. :(

I have a problem with this: it's BS. Total BS. Name one single vaccination that is still administered and show a valid medical source that says it doesn't work.

I meant immunizations, and for sources:http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/technology/science/study-prompts-provinces-to-rethink-flu-p%3E%20lan/article1303330/

I would quibble that flu shots are not mandatory, but I respect that you actually found a source.

I would quibble that flu shots are not mandatory, but I respect that you actually found a source.

Those flu shots are not mandatory, but California is now considering to force children to get some shots in schools without parental consent.

Also, I'm sorry for getting so off topic.

Reading this topic reminds me of why i stopped going on facebook.

Seriously, what do vaccinations... and Obama to that matter, have to do with SOPA and PIPA?

politics, and rumors is what facebook is about ha ha.

The d's had majority of the Senate and House for the first 2 years when Obama took office, there was absolutely nothing accomplished then. Ron Paul has fought against the corporations for 30 years and is actually a Constitutionalist Libertarian, he is running as a repub just so he can wake up more people (Its nearly impossible to see news about third party candidates anyways). I support Ron paul on his foreign policy 100%, we need small government that follows the supreme law of the land, the constitution, and a strong national defense that isn't used as a world police, not to mention he is the only one with a plan to cut $900 billion in his first year in office, including lowering the presidential salary to only $35,000 a year while he already returns most of his money he earns from being a congressman.

Also, forgot to add that Romney and Obama have the exact same funders, same policies and one of the former heads of Bain Capitol is even one of Obama's advisors.

I see a problem with Ron Paul however.

While his ideas may be noble, he is simply out of touch with the modern world.

For instance

we need small government that follows the supreme law of the land, the constitution, and a strong national defense that isn't used as a world police, not to mention he is the only one with a plan to cut $900 billion in his first year in office

Okay, I'll give you a smaller government, however, how would such a smaller government be achieved in the current economic climate?

That follows the supreme law of the land, the constitution

Not gonna happen. The existing laws from 1777 on were drafted to work with the constitution at the time. Do you actually think he and his gov't would be able to work with every single constitutional amendment without breaking several laws, laws the media would leap all over him for?

and a strong national defense that isn't used as a world police

Exactly the UK's reasoning. What are they doing? Firing 3,000 soldiers and scrapping the entire Navy for a start. That's 3,000 people in the Army who can't find work any more, several hundred thousand in the Navy who are either reassigned or let go simply because of a politician's wants and whims.