SeaHawk14

Yes I agree with her being the leading opposition to Putin, she seemed to be the only one who was actually interested in resolving the issue whereas the UK Government felt that "Strongly condemning" the Russian Gov would get results. A centralised currency has its issues, its vulnerable to times of financial crisis but very strong during economic boom, and allows a strong and even growth for all the nations involved. Plus it seems more logical than having the Deutsche Mark, Dutch Guilder, Austrian Frank, French Franc, Italian Lira, Greek Drachma. Traversing across Europe must have been a total nightmare

CG Blaze is making an ELS version currently, I think people should work to their strengths as well. If he doesn't like ELS and has little experience with it then allow someone else to develop it. I'm astounded that it is an unlocked model and I'm sure many people are grateful for that Thats CG Blaze's image on the Altima so far: '?do=embed' frameborder='0' data-embedContent>>

Finkone has three amazing mods. They're relatively new so perhaps a little less known, but amazing: Stopsticks script: '?do=embed' frameborder='0' data-embedContent>> Back-up Script: '?do=embed' frameborder='0' data-embedContent>> Radar-gun Script: '?do=embed' frameborder='0' data-embedContent>> I haven't used the stopsticks one, but I can vouch for the back-up & radar gun. They're phenomenal, especially the radar gun adds realism to the game.

Europe has been spending far too much recently (in the last 15 years), Italy & Greece have been splashing out cash like we had any. Unfortunately for some idiotic reason however all governments seem to think that using austerity measures is the right way to stimulate economic growth & productivity, in the short run it saves money, but in the long run it has large long term effects. I like her because she keeps Italian politicians in check, and her brutality is what they needed to get their asses back in gear, but the whole idea of austerity measures is completely wrong, the IMF and World Bank easily promote the austerity measures, as long as they get their money they don't care. But that being said, during tough times some things do have to be cut

Okay, thats a valid argument with regards to the higher airspeeds. Although the video of the F-4 crashing into the reinforced wall was effective in proving the destruction of an aircraft entirely, however the aircraft is only a tiny aircraft in comparison to the 757, and the wall was obviously much thicker than the reinforced walls in the pentagon, but yes it does prove that at such high speeds it can leave little evidence of an aircraft behind.

I struggle with 9/11. I've very pro-governments, I hate to believe that the US Gov. did this, my belief is that the attack on the twin towers was done by Al-Qaeda, nothing suspicious there. However the attack on the pentagon is another matter The pilot who managed to fly a 757 into the pentagon, (following a steep dive & turn, manoeuvring the aircraft with such precision that he didn't even hit the ground, flying 20 ft off the ground), "Mr. Hanjour failed flying tests, dropped out of flight school twice, and on one occasion, a mere three weeks before the September attacks, was denied permission to rent a Cessna because he showed an almost complete lack of knowledge of aircraft instrumentation to rental personnel". Now one does not simply suddenly learn how to operate a 757 with such precision in three weeks, that's so highly improbable, it's just downright ridiculous to accept that. BUT if that were ignored my next issue is the aircraft wings: they disappeared completely, now aluminium melts at 660c, the temperatures at the Pentagon were 500c, thats 160c difference, despite this absolutely 0 trace was left of the two aircraft wings, the fuel is contained only up to a certain part of the wing, mainly its stored in the roots of the wing. The wings cannot bend backwards into the fuselage as it was claimed due to the tensile strength of the wings, they just snap, not continue to bend. No data from the black boxes? What?! Really?! I'm sorry, they can withstand all sorts of impact: Fire test - Researchers place the unit into a propane-source fireball, cooking it using three burners. The unit sits inside the fire at 2,000 degrees Fahrenheit (1,100 C) for one hour. The FAA requires that all solid-state recorders be able to survive at least one hour at this temperature. No wreckage whatsoever of the aircraft, where did the tail-fin go? The images are of Helios 522 & Air France 447, both which crashed into more resistant surfaces (Mountain and sea) than the AA77, yet despite this, no tail-fin remains. In particular might I note the incident of AF447, which plummeted into the sea at a descent range of between 8,623.1 to 12,173.9 ft / min still had debris large enough. The AA77 had the building to dissipate its energy, which should mean that more wreckage should have survived. but mysteriously no significant evidence remains. I don't know what happened in 9/11, I won't find out either: the US Government will not release any document which will prove them to be responsible, especially for such a large death toll, after an invasion of a region as well. I do have a distrust of the official 9/11 which I HOPE I am wrong in, I refuse to believe that the US Gov. would have been responsible for the death of nearly 3000 people. All I'm saying is a lot is wrong with the report for the AA77.

I'm currently running it on 1.1, I ran it yesterday for thereabouts 2 hours, the callout works well, although it's quite a rare callout, then again I'm running a large amount of scripts and plug-ins. I'm very impressed with your scripts, they're outstanding.

I've attempted to contact him just recently, so far he hasn't replied. Although he said that he was willing to update it and make changes, I also suggested to add more liveries, correct the dirt mapping and make the lighting a little brighter. Although I think the front needs a little improvement as well or is that just me?

Has anyone updated yet? I don't really want to update yet because I've managed to get 1.0d (hotfix) as stable as possible with many scripts

Really? Thats amazing, it's certainly looks very aggressive, and the RAF, Italian Air Force & Luftwaffe have gotten their value for money from those Panavia aircraft. I'm actually very glad to see the Tornado appreciated overseas. Before the Eurofighter Typhoon entered service, the Tornado was my favourite aircraft. Two years ago, an Italian Tornado flew so low over my head I was able to see the grime on the underside, as well as the weapons pylons. It flew no more than 70 feet over the beach. Tell me a little about the F-105, I've never heard of it before, and Wiki doesn't provide amazing stories either. Good choice, some countries use it as a fighter, such as Malaysia, in fact I think it was so good, the Malaysians canceled their order for the Tornado's and chose to continue using the Hawk for fighter duties.

I had forgotten about the AJ-37, I've never in my life seen the Saab 35 though, Saab makes good aircraft, I'm impressed. They're very suitable for nations which need a good multi-role aircraft. I'm actually a big fan of the Gripen. I saw it at an airshow in Italy in 2013. The Eurofighter, Tornado & Gripen are (in that order) my favourite military multi-role aircraft.

Well, I think the approach the US has for aircraft and the European approaches are very different, the Europeans develop aircraft such as the Tornado and the aircraft wings tend to have a smaller profile, the fuselage tends to be smaller, furthermore they've always had the single tail-fin, whereas American jets are really big, the F-14 is huge, as is the F-15, F-22 & F-35. The F-16 & F-18 however have much smaller fuselages and their wings aren't as triangular as the F-15's. I'm sorry, I'm trying to think of the technical word to describe the different wing types but I cannot think of it. Now the Europeans have shifted to delta-wing designs to make the aircraft more unstable, making them good at within visual range combat. The Rafale, Mirage 2000, Saab JAS 39 Gripen & the Eurofighter all have delta wing designs. This makes them better at dogfighting, whereas the US F-22 Raptor has thrust vectoring to achieve the same high AOA's and same performance. The US tend to rely on the fact that they'll shoot down the enemy beyond visual range, thats what makes the raptor so good, it can shoot and kill before the enemy knows it's there, however if it then ends up within visual range the pilot has to work much harder to ensure he doesn't get shot down. Like the F-15, it was really good at dog-fights because it can keep itself out of harms way by firing before the enemies had a chance. I think also being from the UK, I feel more love for the aircraft that we've made because of the proud aviation history that we have, especially since nations have underestimated our military strength and cunning, and we've managed to positively surprise them, I read stories of the Vulcans performance at the Red Flag, and the Buccaneers performance at the Red Flags as well. More recently a USAF F-15 was trying to engage in a mock battle with a twin-seater Eurofighter and they apparently lost. It's little stories like that, because here, unlike the US, there isn't the same sense of patriotism and the military often receives the most negative criticism from the media and public, I just love it when they prove all the nay-sayers wrong. **This is my opinion, I am not a pilot (yet) nor have I received the performance details from the DoD or from the MoD, I'm just basing my opinion on my existing knowledge of aviation & frequent reading of military aviation articles. I respect the USAF and their aircraft, they are outstanding ( I just prefer the RAF and their aircraft) :) **

It was Ralfidude which got me into DCS, but exams coming up, and the fact that I don't like American aircraft means I don't play it often. But damn, theres nothing like dodging an R-73 or R-77, LOVE IT! Once the Eurofighter module gets released by VEAO I will not move from my computer.

But of course, the one and only Eurofighter Typhoon!

I cannot wait! It looks fantastic. I've finally managed to get GTA IV working again so once it's released I'll place it in Police4. Pity it's not ELS though, since the NYPD has a very nice light set up, particularly on their newer 2011 Altima's. BxBugs123 uses these for his 2013 Impala: -Lighting Equipment: Whelen SlimLighter, Whelen LIN6, Whelen 600 Series 5mm LED -Other Equipment: FedSig SmartSiren, FedSign Message Board Controller, -Extra Parts: (Lightbar Federal Signal Vision SLR & Whelen LED Message Board It probably means more to you than me, but in case you wish to create an ELS model as well, although I know that the Altima doesn't have the Federal Signal Vision SLR, Does this one look right? Because the lighter below is the: Federal Signal LED Vision SL

Yes, that's the thing I was talking about. That seems very accurate! Outstanding model so far

Damn you work fast! So far it's very impressive, later on I'm going to take out the civilian version for a spin. A tiny detail missing (from what I see on images), it seems that the NYPD Altima's have like additional mudguards on the main body. God I don't know how to describe it, they look like plastic covers on the back of the wheel arches, the front one sticks out quite a lot. If you don't understand what I'm talking about (who would) I suggest just search for a few images and examine the rear of the wheel arches.

YES! The Altima will join the NYPD fleet in my game at last. Now a very difficult choice, which vehicle will it replace? Good luck with the civilian version, I hope you make the NYPD version.