c13

Yeah, it is. I know one of them is not eating meat on Friday. But enough bible bashing for me on this thread

I'm essentially libertarian, so people have the right to do what they want as long as it doesn't harm others. While I don't see the point of marriage (to me it's simply a title), no one should be denied it. Homosexuality happens in nature, and like most of my other views, passing laws against it won't make it go away. I also find it almost funny that the part of the bible that is against homosexuality is also against things like talking to women on their time of the month.

Is it really necessary for you to post a new topic for each goat video? MODERATOR NOTICE Topics merged

You could always make a mod that suits your needs by yourself then

I like CJ24's tahoes. Unlike the others, they don't have an overly done amount of lights (and I get errors when replacing textures on Bug's tahoes). Also, moved to Content modifications

Unsurprisingly, this is barely being mentioned in the media (the US at least, not sure about others). Anyways, the march is about people being against the food company Monsanto, which modifies seeds of plants to be resistant. However, health concerns are caused by the genetic altering, leading to over 60 countries banning GMO foods due to no proof that GMOs are safe. Monsanto has even fought against labeling of foods as GMOs. One of the more bothersome parts about this company's power is that recently a bill was passed by the US Congress titled the Monsanto Protection Act, which gives the company immunity to any potential laws deeming it unsafe for part of this year. An estimated 2 million people across 52 countries have showed up for these marches, here is a link to a news story. http://rt.com/news/march-against-monsanto-gmo-776/

News is here: and at the beginning of NicolaiB's latest video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4vMh9JMNdAs

Finally some good news

MODERATOR NOTICE Moved to proper forum

Because those laws work so well in Mexico and Brazil(strictest gun laws in the world by the way). I know a guy who was in South America for a while, in Brazil everyone had guns despite it being illegal. The reason why is that because to enforce those gun laws, they needed to have heavily armed police. People would walk up behind police, smash them over the head with something, take their guns and leave. With that logic, we might as well disarm police because most fallen cops are killed before they realize what has happened.

ELS, especially the older versions

That would probably be because the UK tends to have a much higher violent crime rate than the US (1,2,3) due to the fact that the cities are more condensed compared to a majority of the US populations living in suburbs or rural areas. While gun control may be the answer to many other countries, it has proven to not be the answer for the US.

But until someone comes up with a way to instantly remove 300 million guns from this country's civilians and then the government and police to ensure that the people can not be oppressed (most foreigners know how corrupt most police agencies can be in the US. Hell, even in Canada I just saw a video of a Regional Police Officer threatening to beat a suspect and plant cocaine on him). The idea for gun control that many people outside of the US want is impossible to do in the US simply because there are too many guns. Until the number of guns is greatly reduced, I and many others won't be disarming ourselves due to the actions of some criminals when many more are still out there. And I never said that civilians know how to make those types of decisions, I pointed out that it is hypocritical to say civilians wouldn't know how to respond to these situations because few police (not so much in Europe, but in a lot of other countries and the US) know how to do this either. Just look at the FBI Hostage Rescue Team, supposedly one of the most highly trained SWAT Teams in the world, fired 7 shots and only hit an unarmed girl on a couch with a ricochet (story).

No, a gun doesn't offer instant protection. However, it acts as a strong deterrence that someone might be armed (look at the difference in crime rates from Chicago, where it is illegal to leave your house with a gun unless it's disassembled compared to rural areas in conceal carry states). Taking this to the extreme, James Holmes, the shooter at the Batman movie in Colorado, had seven theaters closer to him, some with even higher seating capacity. The one thing that separated the theater he chose from the others was that it was a gun free zone, where only police are allowed to carry weapons. Given the chances, I'd rather be carrying and have a better chance of defending myself. On the LAPD incident, this furthers my claim that police in America are the exact opposite of highly trained with firearms. Based on my work and multiple people I know that are ex-cops and current cops, they all say that 90% of cops are unable to shoot. This problem severely increases for major city departments. The average qualification for most police in my area is 100 rounds twice a year, and almost no one is ever denied(I know of a story of a 17 year veteran literally crying because he couldn't get on Arizona's state wide gang task force due to his poor marksmanship). A lot of us "gun nuts", especially concealed carriers, go through 200 rounds in a week. One story that wasn't talked about much was the Clackamas Mall Shooting in Portland, Oregon. Another gun free zone, the suspect walked in with an AR-15 and shot 30 rounds, injuring two people. A concealed carrier who failed to notice the sign that would've made him a victim pulled out his glock and aimed, but didn't fire due to people behind the shooter. Despite the fact no rounds came at him, the shooter ran around a corner and shot himself, just because someone showed force. The facts are that almost all mass shootings occur in gun free zones, police take 5-10 minutes to arrive and move into those locations, and all but one mass shooter have committed suicide or given up upon someone with a gun showing up. Additionally, over 80% of US cops support allowing teachers to carry sidearms on school grounds after training and over 90% believe that a good guy with a gun could've lessened the losses at any of the recent mass shootings (story). To channel Barack Obama, if it saves just one life it's worth it. TLDR: The potential of a gun is a deterrence, cops aren't a representation of most gun owners in America, a gun doesn't need to be fired to stop a tragedy, almost all mass shooters give up or kill themselves when a good guy with a gun shows up and over 80% of US cops believe in arming teachers and 90% of US cops believe a good guy with a gun could've prevented loss of life at any recent mass shootings.

From what I've read (I could've misread though), CO19 is the specialist unit (like our SWAT Teams), but in times of elevated risk, there are some patrol officers that can be given weapons from the PD armory (kind of like a percentage of non-swat officers carrying AR-15s in some US departments, but a lot more restricted)

Support is used for issues with the game, i.e.: Crashing. This belongs in gameplay modifications. MODERATOR NOTICE Moved to proper section

You're only allowed to upload other people's content with their permission and proper credits. However, it is perfectly fine to modify textures for private use (as long as you don't share them with anyone).

Create a new HandlingID in the vehicles.ide file, then create a new row with the same title in the actual handling file.