Hystery

Understanding is the most important part in a discussion or debate. ( ͡ᵔ ͜ʖ ͡ᵔ )

Because why reading a guide when you can ask the same question over and over again. (╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻

#makesearchbargreatagain

By using a mods folder with OpenIV like you should have to begin with.

Did you update your drivers recently? If yes, then revert to a previous version of them. If no, then update them.

Use the search bar, and you'll find what you need

Wish I could help on this one, but I actually never bothered replacing the policeold car slots. I'm a bit surprised it doesn't work just like the other slots though. Did you make sure you didn't forget a small < > " or something like that somewhere?

Reinstall everything on a clean install of the game and it'll work. 100% guaranteed.

The police slot uses the 13. The police2 slot uses the 1. No idea what the police3 uses though since it's either always replaced with modified carvariation lines or left vanilla.

Yep. As long as you make sure to rename the stuff, it'll work.

Got called for a traffic stop backup. Got run over by a random police car chasing someone. *insert Dark Souls death screen* Profit.

The police2 slot uses the sirensetting 1. And you can install the carvariation lines of the car in the carvariation.meta located in the mpchristmas2 DLC patch, it'll work.

Happened to me a few times too, wouldn't mind to know where the lines to lower the traffic density are.

To be honest I hope more for a world where democracy is actually a thing. Power to the people. And not to some random assholes in suits deciding everything for us and influenced by lobbies and all the like. One can dream.

PostFX and Shaders set to high or above.

1. 20% of the monthly salary per year working in that company + 33% of the monthly salary per year working in that company if you were there since more than 10 years. Put in situation, a guy who worked roughly 4 years and a half for 2000 euros per month will get an indemnity of ~1800 euros. It's already not that much when you think about it when someone dedicated 4 years of their life and got illegally fired. 3. A day is 24 hours. 8 hours of work per day. That leaves 16 hours of rest. This can be lowered to a legal minimum of 11 hours (which means you would work 13 hours a day). That minimum can be cut down. Basically you can work more while resting less, legally. 4. That's NOT fine here. What has to be taken into account is the difference of culture and economy. We're not the US either. US have been pro-business and pro-liberalism since ages, it still didn't help them really well so far considering the gap in wages and the gap between the richest and poorest population increasing. 5. Here you are allowed to leave your work for a few days if you have a relative who is gravely sick or handicapped, to avoid negative consequences on your work. For example, if your father has a cancer and is about to die within the few days, you're allowed to leave your work and be next to him when he'll pass away instead of him dying while you're working your ass off. I think it's, you know, human. 6. You're actually pointing at the exact problem. Many, if not all workers care about their company. When they find a job, most of the time they want to keep it, and they like where they work. The thing is, nowadays french company employers do not care about their employees. Their employees are just names and numbers, not persons, and thus they just use them as tools instead of considering them as the important cogwheels that allow their companies to run. It creates a negative atmosphere, a feeling to be exploited, and to be treated like animals. The rest of the points you adressed... I think it's just a cultural difference. That's how it has been in France since 1936 and 1968. We earned those rights after long battles, so it's only natural to not want to let them go, especially when they are beneficial for us. The thing to see is that all specialists agree on this fact: french workers are actually the most productive workers in Europe. Because our system allows workers to work, but also have a life next to it. Rested and happy workers mean more productive workers. Breaking down this balance will turn people lethargic because of the tiredness, angry because of the poor working conditions, depressed because unable to settle down somewhere since their job can be taken away from them at any moment. What will this do? It'll make the french workers worth less. Wages will go down, and we'll result in the new China of Europe with workers paid with ridiculous wages while working 12 hours per day. All in all our quality of life will be destroyed. That's why we are fighting against that law and the great majority of the population is against it. Not disagreeing on this. France is the european country with the heaviest taxes, both on companies and citizens. Or well. Companies. On small companies. The large ones always manage to hide their earnings in tax havens, which is also an entire problem on its own. Immigrants cost hundred times less than tax evasion, and cars are insured, so it's not the real problem. Liberalism, capitalism and pro-business actions have also been tried since decades and failed miserably, because it creates an endless circle. A new economic system is found, it works for a time, it makes rich people richer, it makes poor and middle-class people poorer, and then, an economical crisis occurs. Rich people hide their money somewhere, they remain unaffected by the crisis, poor and middle-class people have to endure the hard times, and then another economic system is found. Rinse and repeat.

They defend the old system simply because the one they want to apply is even worse. Amongst them, some of the biggest lines: No more minimum ammount of indemnity in case of unjustified layoff (like if your boss fires you for a supposed mistake you actually never did) In case of unjustified/illegal layoff, the maximum the ex-employee can get is capped to 15 months of salary The minimum 11 hours of rest per 24 hours can be cut down in small parts along the day A company can decide to fire a large part of their employees without any economical justification, they can do it just if they feel like it The minimum leave duration for malady or handicap of a relative (for example if your mom has a car accident and you need to take care of her for a few days) is no longer guaranteed by the law Labour medicine will have minimum voice and almost inexistent presence (for example, the labour medicine are those who put my mom in a leave for massive breakdown and depression after she has been verbally and psychologically harassed for months by her ex-bosses, with the law they want to pass it wouldn't have happened and she would probably have ended herself by now) The minimum leave duration for natural catastrophe is no longer guaranteed by the law (imagine in the US, a tornado rampages your house and nothing is left out of it, well, your boss can still tell you "Come to work or you're fired", seems nice isn't it?) In case the company you work in moves from a city to another, if you can't manage to follow, they can fire you more easily. In the past, if you couldn't follow your company moving from a city to another, they had the obligation to relocate you in one of their other subsidiaries that would be closer and better for you. In situation, let's say the company you work in moves from Los Angeles to New York. But they have a susbidary in San Francisco. You don't have the money to move to New York, but you could afford to move to San Francisco. Right now, the company would have the obligation to move you to San Francisco, or to fire you with indemnities. With the labour law they want to pass, they can just fire you, period. The dates of your holidays can be changed up to the last moment. For example, you've planned a cruise in the carribeans. You used your available holiday days to leave for a week, you bought the tickets, the hotel, everything. And the day before you leave, they can tell you "No, you stay". Standby time can be withdrawn from your rest time. For example, you're a cop. In France, some cops have work hours, and standby hours. During those standby hours, they're at home or wherever they want as if it was a day off, but if they are called for work, they have to answer. Those standby time weren't counted as rest time, because they're still technically working, without actually working. With that law, the standby time would be withdrawn from your total rest time, meaning that as a cop, you'd have your work times even longer. And we all know what tiredness can do on people, I doubt it'd be wise on workers like cops, firefighters, EMS and the like. The medical observation before being hired turns into a simple information visit. And that's just a tiny fraction of the entire law. The Labour law counts 467 amendments. Summarized, the law is pro-business, pro-liberalism, and anti-people. They allow companies to fire more easily, and to make people work more and paid less. This is surely not going to solve the unemployment problem. The unemployment problem is mainly due to large companies that move their factories out of the country (every day we hear about yet another factory of 500 workers that is closed and moved to China or wherever), as well as the bosses of those large companies who keep increasing their wages and the part of the shareholders. For example, Renault, large vehicle company, fired hundreds of workers, while the CEO increased his wage of several millions. Millions that could be used to actually hire workers, but they prefer to get richer. Meanwhile, our government gave one BILLION euros to major companies to help them hiring workers. What did they do? They took the billion, and fired people. Those are the problems that should be solved, amongst many others. Governments should stop attacking low and middle-class, and they should start taking things in hands about the richest classes.

I already updated the guide yesterday about that, but thanks for reminding it.

Honestly? I think they are told to do so. The government wants to pass a labour law no one wants (71% of the population is against it). People protest, do strikes. The majority of the the population support them. What to do in this case? Denigrate the protestation movement by turning it into violent conflicts. No one likes violence. People are favorable to peaceful protests, not to civil war-like sceneries. If they see the protests turn into open conflict between protesters and police enforcement, their opinion will turn defavorable, and they'll want the protests to stop. And without protests, the government has a good reason to pass the labour law, saying people are actually not against i. Even though some cops are actually happy to charge into the crowd, that's a fact that can't be denied. A video shows a small group of cops saying "Using maximum force" against a peaceful group of protesters.

There wasn't anyone sitting in a burned car. One of the testimonies about this event was also actually false and was from someone who wasn't even a cop to begin with. The police brutality occurs against anyone who attempts to protest. Even against journalists. Even against CHILDREN. Police charged a group of 12 years old kids no less than last week, injuring 2 gravely. In 2 months, 48 investigations were initiated by the internal services for police brutality. The total complaints about police brutality raised by almost 200% just for this year.

You don't have the patchday10ng because you didn't update your game, that's why.