Deleted.

Edited August 16, 20196 yr by Niedosik

Yea, that was intentional, he was trying to make a point. 

3 hours ago, ToeBius said:

Yea, that was intentional, he was trying to make a point. 

and he was justified in kicking a non violent suspect like that? fuck that this is the problem with police apologists they will defend anything they do regardless of how disgusting the act is and this is why people don't like or respect the police...fuck that cop

23 minutes ago, J T said:

and he was justified in kicking a non violent suspect like that? fuck that this is the problem with police apologists they will defend anything they do regardless of how disgusting the act is and this is why people don't like or respect the police...fuck that cop

  When did I say that it was justified? When did I defend him? Stop jumping to conclusions without thinking about shit.  I was just pointing it out, I am not a police apologist.  You sir need to take a chill pill.

 

Some of you people on here need stop putting words in peoples mouths.  Freaking childish

Edited May 25, 20187 yr by ToeBius
Childish games

Another idiot thinking that because he wears a uniform he's above the law.

I'm about as police-supporting as they come, but come on, even I look at that and say "fuck that guy".

2 hours ago, CadmiumRed said:

I'm about as police-supporting as they come, but come on, even I look at that and say "fuck that guy".

 

Agreed.  and he did it RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE DASH CAM!  He didn't give a shit.

Seen a lot of this lately, three to five incidents in the last year. Sometimes they do a nice jogging start and a football punt like kick. A little overboard and rather incompetent and stupid to do it whilst in front of any vehicle. Or at all anymore given the body cam situation.

I remember a local case when a driver was yanked out of the car and thrown on the ground, landing with his lobe on a stone. Was detained, processed and released this day, felt sick in the evening, was taken to a hospital and died a day later due to internal hemorrhage.

 

I am pretty sure head kicks are not taught in the academy as a way to ensure compliance.

Dunno what's more sickening to be fair. That dude thinking kicking someone in the face is a good way to represent law enforcement, or the hundreds of comments under the video encouraging this kind of behavior.

8 hours ago, Hystery said:

Dunno what's more sickening to be fair. That dude thinking kicking someone in the face is a good way to represent law enforcement, or the hundreds of comments under the video encouraging this kind of behavior.

 

 

Here in the United States some criminals find jail and handcuffs a joke, and all they understand is pain and physical violence. In cases such as that, i believe brute force should be used. In my opinion Brazilian police have it figured out. Treat the gang members like dogs, and see how they like it. If we did this to blood and crips gang members here in the US i bet you would see a lot less of them. Cruel?, yes. Savage?, Yes. Disturbing, yes. Effective ...-....also Yes. The ends justify the means.

 

 

( This is not a fatal OIS video or that graphic, so don't go breaking out your warning points yet. ) 

 

 

Edited May 28, 20187 yr by Crouching Cop Hidden Badge

8 hours ago, Crouching Cop Hidden Badge said:

 

 

Here in the United States some criminals find jail and handcuffs a joke, and all they understand is pain and physical violence. In cases such as that, i believe brute force should be used. In my opinion Brazilian police have it figured out. Treat the gang members like dogs, and see how they like it. If we did this to blood and crips gang members here in the US i bet you would see a lot less of them. Cruel?, yes. Savage?, Yes. Disturbing, yes. Effective ...-....also Yes. The ends justify the means.

 

 

 

 

Wow, you're serious, aren't you?

 

Jail and handcuffs may be a joke, as they're used to subdue and contain the suspect until the court hears his case. They're not supposed to be used to teach lessons or punish people. If suspects are noncompliant, there are variety of other means, including the lethal force. The US has one of the most relaxed lethal force usage standards that I know of, and you're saying this isn't enough?

 

Gangs and violent crimes don't appear out of nowhere and are not foreign invaders that must be killed by any means. In case of many Latin America countries gangs in those famous favelas appear because of the poor economic situation, work problems, lack of education and means to support a family by honest living. Instead of solving these problems, governments create paramilitary units with police powers, give them APCs and a green light for free fire. Are you saying the US (with its highest GDP, strong economy etc) is this deep down it has to declare a war on its citizens?

 

Don't get me wrong, I'm in no way supporting or defending the criminals. However, the police is the wrong tool to use to solve such complicated problems as ethnic crime, ghetto crime and so on. It's like the school shootings, you can increase the police presence as much as you wish, but the reasons lie elsewhere. And suggesting that brutal treatment will do any good other than make them hate the cops even more and open the police to lawsuits from innocents mistaken for criminals (and beaten to the near death) is, in my opinion, incorrect.

 

 

On 5/29/2018 at 7:00 AM, Crouching Cop Hidden Badge said:

 

 

Here in the United States some criminals find jail and handcuffs a joke, and all they understand is pain and physical violence. In cases such as that, i believe brute force should be used. In my opinion Brazilian police have it figured out. Treat the gang members like dogs, and see how they like it. If we did this to blood and crips gang members here in the US i bet you would see a lot less of them. Cruel?, yes. Savage?, Yes. Disturbing, yes. Effective ...-....also Yes. The ends justify the means.

 

 

( This is not a fatal OIS video or that graphic, so don't go breaking out your warning points yet. ) 

 

 

If police brutality was a solution to crime, china, russia and most of south america and eastern europe would be much safer than the US or UK. Instead we see Brazil, where police brutality is rampant, has even worse crime statistics than the worst areas of the US.

On 5/29/2018 at 3:44 PM, Hastings said:

Wow, you're serious, aren't you?

 

Jail and handcuffs may be a joke, as they're used to subdue and contain the suspect until the court hears his case. They're not supposed to be used to teach lessons or punish people. If suspects are noncompliant, there are variety of other means, including the lethal force. The US has one of the most relaxed lethal force usage standards that I know of, and you're saying this isn't enough?

 

Gangs and violent crimes don't appear out of nowhere and are not foreign invaders that must be killed by any means. In case of many Latin America countries gangs in those famous favelas appear because of the poor economic situation, work problems, lack of education and means to support a family by honest living. Instead of solving these problems, governments create paramilitary units with police powers, give them APCs and a green light for free fire. Are you saying the US (with its highest GDP, strong economy etc) is this deep down it has to declare a war on its citizens?

 

Don't get me wrong, I'm in no way supporting or defending the criminals. However, the police is the wrong tool to use to solve such complicated problems as ethnic crime, ghetto crime and so on. It's like the school shootings, you can increase the police presence as much as you wish, but the reasons lie elsewhere. And suggesting that brutal treatment will do any good other than make them hate the cops even more and open the police to lawsuits from innocents mistaken for criminals (and beaten to the near death) is, in my opinion, incorrect.

 

 

I disagree with a quite a few of things you say but that was 100 percent right on, couldn't have said it better myself.

Put that cop in jail.