Jump to content

New Bill worse than SOPA introduced


Recommended Posts

This is what I get for protecting these bureaucrats and their lazy asses.....

Not only that, you get to make money for the defense contractors that lobby "our" government too.

Sticks and stones may break bones, but 5.56 fragments on impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not only that, you get to make money for the defense contractors that lobby "our" government too.

That's just lovely, I missed those days when the government actually used the Due-Process System to make Constitutional laws...ahh the 90's

Edited by wmai20
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well here in the UK a new bill is close to being introduced that allows the Government to:

- access ALL of your text messages and phone calls whenever they want

- Demand sensitive browsing data from your ISP

- access ALL your emails, anytime they want

How hard is it to migrate to the US? Can I stay with an American user from this forum? This bill has downright fucking outraged me as it clearly violates human rights and your right to privacy.

I hate this country,

Sincerely, one pissed off British Citizen

Processor: Intel i5-6600 @ 3.30GHz 

GPU: MSI ARMOR GeForce GTX 1080 OC

Ram: 16GB Skylake

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well here in the UK a new bill is close to being introduced that allows the Government to:

- access ALL of your text messages and phone calls whenever they want

- Demand sensitive browsing data from your ISP

- access ALL your emails, anytime they want

How hard is it to migrate to the US? Can I stay with an American user from this forum? This bill has downright fucking outraged me as it clearly violates human rights and your right to privacy.

I hate this country,

Sincerely, one pissed off British Citizen

Almost as bad here, and only getting worse. Recent court rulings allow police to seize a cell phone during a traffic stop without probable cause and download all the data, and anyone who refuses this will be charged with resisting arrest. Not only this, but HR 347, NDAA, and an update to the NDRP have been passed. The TSA is being put onto buses and is now starting highway checkpoints in Tennessee and Texas. I wouldn't come to the US if I were you.

Sticks and stones may break bones, but 5.56 fragments on impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How hard is it to migrate to the US? Can I stay with an American user from this forum? This bill has downright fucking outraged me as it clearly violates human rights and your right to privacy.

Well... I've never moved out of a country, but from what I have heard, it isn't very easy. You have to go through a lot of shit. Especially going to America, we're very strict. I guess everything is for a reason...

Edited by Original Light

http://i.imgur.com/4KzXo.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How hard is it to migrate to the US? Can I stay with an American user from this forum? This bill has downright fucking outraged me as it clearly violates human rights and your right to privacy.

Mainly you have to study topics on "American English" and US History/Government and go through the "

Naturalization Test"

. As Original Light said, it probably involves a barrage of paper work and airport security scans....

http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.eb1d4c2a3e5b9ac89243c6a7543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=a2ec6811264a3210VgnVCM100000b92ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=a2ec6811264a3210VgnVCM100000b92ca60aRCRD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

None of this stuff really matters. As long as the constitution is there, we can fight back legally against these things. Not promoting anything, but in Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306, it says “Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.” "Resisting arrest" for not giving up your cell phone is lawful, therefore it's legal to fight back. No where in the constitution does it say you have to give up your private information, the 4th amendment protects that. Even though I plan to go into the Military, I think it's a good idea for most non-felons to get a CCW, so that if something like this does happen, a cop pulling a gun on your can be countered in less than a second.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

None of this stuff really matters. As long as the constitution is there, we can fight back legally against these things. Not promoting anything, but in Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306, it says “Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.” "Resisting arrest" for not giving up your cell phone is lawful, therefore it's legal to fight back. No where in the constitution does it say you have to give up your private information, the 4th amendment protects that. Even though I plan to go into the Military, I think it's a good idea for most non-felons to get a CCW, so that if something like this does happen, a cop pulling a gun on your can be countered in less than a second.

But the issue is that the government is not following the constitution, and will make any citizens that fight back a scapegoat. A majority of the public would side with the government, because "the law is the law", even if it is an illegal one.

Sticks and stones may break bones, but 5.56 fragments on impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the issue is that the government is not following the constitution, and will make any citizens that fight back a scapegoat. A majority of the public would side with the government, because "the law is the law", even if it is an illegal one.

But the few that have brains and understand that we can fight back against this can try to make the people realize this. If Ron Paul isn't elected, we just might have to fight back with lethal force.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But the few that have brains and understand that we can fight back against this can try to make the people realize this. If Ron Paul isn't elected, we just might have to fight back with lethal force.

Protests may be called to order but lethal force is not necessary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's a possibility. If you resist an unlawful arrest and an officer pulls a gun on you, you either get rid of him or he shoots you.

That's not an issue for me. You are trained for disarming a lethal suspect during Basic Marine Training; but I see your referring to the all common American. :P

Edited by wmai20
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's not an issue for me. You are trained for disarming a lethal suspect during Basic Marine Training; but I see your referring to the all common American. :P

Exactly. You guys are killing beasts, a typical American has no idea what the hell he's doing. Most of teenagers today are pot heads that use steroids and think they're so tough. I'm ashamed to be part of this generation, but in a few years, I'll be in the military along with you and I won't have to worry about it either. I'm a black belt (even though it really means nothing), and I plan to go to the Army Cadet Corps to learn the Army martial arts, and hopefully study MCMAP, before I go to boot camp or basic, whatever I'm gonna do .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Protests may be called to order but lethal force is not necessary.

The second amendment was put there for the very reason that the government may become too corrupt. I don't want a civil war, but if our "leaders" keep getting chosen/bought out it may be necessary to put this country back on the right path.

Sticks and stones may break bones, but 5.56 fragments on impact.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...