wmai20

A complete of controls can be found on pages 10-15, >LCPDFR 1.0 User Documentation. (Available via list of downloads)
 
Alternatively, you can view the list below:
 

LOL.

That sounds pretty strange. Definitely unusual.
 
By the way, how do you like my new signature? :D

You keep up with peoples profiles don't you? :D
 
Oh and Joyeux anniversaire!

Stop what? Stop talking about GTA V coming to PC on a forum based around a modification for GTA IV on PC? Yeah, that's not gonna happen. If you don't want to see it, don't click on the thread, but this sort of thing is *exactly* what you should expect lots of threads about on a site devoted to the PC version of the previous game in the series.

Hey buddy if you would like to code for a year and a half and make LCPD:FR by yourself that's great! Nobody asked you to install the modification into your game. I don't think you realize how hard it was to create LCPD:FR from scratch. Rockstar, from what I know, didn't include a simple manual about modding GTA 4. People had to create it from scratch. The errors and crashes may get annoying but if you don't like it you don't have to play it or tell other people "hey don't install this mod it has terrible crashes and errors". Have a good day.

First of all it's not a "Add on" it's a mod.
 
Second, We're sorry that it can't be a 100000% perfect script, We'd like to see you try and make it better, Gta 4 is unstable in some ways and it's not easy to code a mod perfect. For one you probably installed it wrong, or just don't understand anything about it.
 
Sorry that you're a newbie who knows jack shit about modding and the hard work that this modding community has put into it.
 
Go play some other, Shittier mod like Pursuit mod but don't come in here and start crying about how buggy it is or that you can't understand it.
 
Wrong section too.....I don't think there is even a section for this.

Good, Zimmerman was innocent from the beggining, the media took it way out of context, I knew he was innocent from the beggining.

1.) You spelled community horribly wrong.

2.) Did anyone approve the group name? It sounds an awful lot like you're trying to imitate the G17 staff. That doesn't sit too well with me.

The shooting of the dog was justified. The dog lunged towards the officer, even when being told to stand down by its owner

I feel the officer was justified in shooting. The dog clearly lunged, as previously stated. Unfortunately, it had to be done. Interestingly enough, the Brimfield, Ohio police chief shared his opinion and also shed a little light on additional circumstances that may have caused the arrest, this is the post that was made.

"Chief’s Babble…..on the Rottweiler.
I have received lots of messages and emails about the shooting of a Rottweiler by a police officer. Some of you are very passionate for both sides of this argument. I understand both sides and would like to offer some opinion on the incident…as usual. Let’s look at the incident....

• According to the LA Times, The police department was out in force after responding to armed-robbery suspects who had barricaded themselves in a home. The situation could have been deadly and officers needed to secure a perimeter. 

•The subject with the dog has a history with that particular department, including being arrested for drugs and domestic violence and also has a current lawsuit against the department.

•Many people in the background could be heard asking what the subject and his dog were doing “so close” to police cars and the operations going on at the residence.

•The subject appears to exchange words with officers, puts his dog in the vehicle with windows down….and then walks up to be handcuffed by officers…as if he wanted to be arrested…perhaps to use as a “retaliation” charge against the department for the ongoing lawsuit. That is an opinion....from experience.

•The Rottweiler jumps from the vehicle, walks towards the officers and subject and then lunges at an officer. The officers shoots and kills the dog.

Most of you know I love dogs. I have had several dogs in my lifetime, including a very nice Rottweiler. I did not like watching this incident, at all. There are places I will not take my dogs, out of just plain old common sense….One of those places would most definitely be to a barricaded subjects call. I would also not show up to a scene involving a police department I was in an active lawsuit with and begin cajoling officers….particularly with my dog in tow. Yes, I know we honor free speech in America; however, rights come with responsibilities. 

The incident transpired in less than ten seconds. The officers made a snap decision and will be judged on that decision for some time to come. That’s what this profession is. Also...the officers should have known who they were dealing with and expected this type of behavior. Preparation wins every time. 

After watching this and reading many sides of the story, I have to fault of the owner of the dog for most of this drama. Dog ownership is a responsibility, not a status. Would the owner have taken his two-year-old child that close to danger? Dogs are loyal and that is evident by this dog’s response to his owner being arrested. For that loyalty, we owe our four legged friends the same in return. 

I know we have our dog lovers on board here. I am one also. Do not be blinded by emotion. Most if not all of you would NOT show up at an active and dangerous police scene, with your dog, to yell at police officers. Many of you watch from the safe and needed distance....and that is the norm. 

Many dogs have less than great best friends. Harsh... but very true.….Chief Oliver"
 
So the fact that the man had a lawsuit with the department may have been the reason he "surrendered" himself. Just another perspective.

The man was blasting loud and distracting music while getting a little too close to the officers who were making an arrest. There's a reason why he was charged with Interference of a police officer.
 
California Penal Code Section 148 A: "Every person who willfully resists, delays, or obstructs any public officer, peace officer, or any emergency medical technician as defined in Division 2.5 of the Heath and Safety Code, in the discharge or attempt discharge any duty of his or her office or employment, when  no other punishment is prescribed, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1000), or by imprisonment in a county jail not to exceed one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment. 
 
The arrest was justified as he indeed, delay and obstruct a public/peace officer. Refering to the latter information I'm assuming that the "arrest" was justified. Before his arrest he came up to the officers and asked "Why there were no black officers on scene?". That statement was unneeded and uncalled for. He's just a man nitpicking every little detail of what he thinks is "wrong" about the department just to support lawsuit he planned against the Hawthorne Police Department. He was clearly asking to get arrested with his actions and music, and he got it. 
 
To all the users on this topic posting how the dog was "just a adorable, cute, loving, dog", it was an 80 pound ROTTWEILER. These dogs are VERY aggressive when their master is attacked, and can cause SERIOUS damage. A tazer would simply aggravate even more and possible endanger the officers even further. A dog with 80 pounds of PURE MUSCLE can very well withstand a tazer, assuming the ONE shot actually makes contact. This is not LCPDFR, you can't reload a tazer in one second. Both prongs of the actual projectile have to make contact with the skin of your target. Considering these circumstances, using a tazer in this instance could be risky.
 
As previously stated in my previous post, the dog would have died anyways if he had been tazed or shot. The officer could have: 1. Shot the dog and saving the county money, or 2. Tazing the dog, transfer/housing/feeding it at an animal control facility, and then have a court order for it to be put down for rabies testing. Either way, the dog was going to die. For what it's worth, the dog owner was stupid for conducting his actions, he knowingly knew the consequences. Should have left the dog at home.
 


http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/148.html http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/01/police-shoot-dog_n_3530990.html
http://www.bakersfieldnow.com/news/local/Caught-on-video-Police-shoot-kill-dog-during-arrest-214018171.html
http://newsone.com/2625509/leon-rosby-california-police-shoot-dog/
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/graphic-video-police-shoot-dog-article-1.1387861

How come any action the police takes his to lead to a giant discussion like this? The police is equipped for a reason. A taser or spray won't do anything to a dog since they will do anything to protect their owner. A gun is to protect the officer himself from life or near threatening injuries. A dog can cause mayor injuries. So if the gun is the only option, use it. You can not make the officer suffer because the silly dog wants to protect its owner. For those who are defending the dog: Each story has two sides. Keep that in mind.
 
I say, leave it if you don't know the rights/procedures of the police. And don't come with wannabe-knowledge, as I know most people think they know everything when it comes to police. The officers did well.

The shooting of the dog was justified. The dog lunged towards the officer, even when being told to stand down by its owner

A dog can run much faster than a human so pepper spray would likely be ineffective as the dog could latch on and bite before getting a god shot off. Pepper spray also effects the officer at close range, as you get some blowback in your own eyes. That's why you have to get sprayed if you go to the academy. A taser may also be ineffective since both prongs have to hit and pierce the skin.

The shooting of the dog was justified. The dog lunged towards the officer, even when being told to stand down by its owner

The shooting of the dog was justified. The dog lunged towards the officer, even when being told to stand down by its owner

The shooting of the dog was justified. The dog lunged towards the officer, even when being told to stand down by its owner

Whilst I don't agree with the actions of the officers for arresting the guy for simply filming a scene, they were right to fire on the dog.
 
If you look closely, you can see the dog lunge towards the officer with the intent to attack him. This happens all the time and most departments (if not all) have a policy to only return aggression if their lives are in immediate danger, a dog that size could easily cause some serious damage to that cop.
 
Although its still painful to see a poor animal suffer pain like it, it was justified in a certain aspect. Here's what happens when an officer doesn't defend against an attacking animal;

Google.com is not a source, it's a search engine. Are you just trying to be ignorant or are you really?

Thanks everyone.
 
And people, please, lets stay on the topic... this is not a discussion for car/brand copyright ;)
I already stated that we will not use it.
 
@Bravuogn
Never o/
 
Cheers

EDITED IN June, 2014.
 
Hello everyone,
I don't know if there is still someone from this forum following our game, but I really wanted to tell you that we are officially back developing the game (about a month ago).
Our company closed a deal with a nice publisher and we are going to launch this year (release soon to be announced in our website).
 
I really wanted to thank you, everyone, that supported us in the past and I hope we can count with you again.
Check our website once more to see the news and we even has a recent new (pitch) gameplay video. But our current version (not in video) is MUCH better and we are going to have much more news in our website soon. I really wish I could have some of you guys, fans of police games, to support us.
 

 
And admins / moderators, please, keep up this great mod, the last version is great and I really enjoy playing it ;)
 
Cheers
 
==================================================================================================================
 
Hello all,
 
Its been a long time since my last check here, I was real busy.
Today I want to announce here a game "for fun" I was creating, I got good feedbacks and now I want to finish this nice project. Its called Police Tactics, a game where you control a police officer life, including its duties while in blue/black and while off-duty.
 

 
EDIT: this project is now been developed by my game studio, Odin Game Studio.
 
It will be good to get feedback from a community that loves police related games and this is the perfect moment.
 
Game briefing can be found here: http://www.indiedb.com/games/police-tactics
Development blog, with always latest infos: http://policetacticsgame.blogspot.com.br/
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/PoliceTactics
 
Cheers
 

Too late. lol

What the fuck is that a post to mean? Trying to start a flame war?