as far as our cities really competely flase statements bout them seeing how there is barely if any shootouts with police on a daily / weekly basis

read BETWEEN the lines, i said to the middle east military by invading THEIR country to them you are the terrorist's/threat's, regardless of what the government say's, to the Al quada, or whatever milita the U.S military faces YOU are invading THEIR country/ territory and they aim to defend it, regardless of what the government say's, the killing will alway's continue, i'm not talking about police i'm talking about crip's killing blood's & bloods killing crip's etc etc, innocent people everywhere will alway's get in the crossfire of any war let be inner city gang's or in a foreign country.

bottom line, the U.S military would not be in the middle east if it was not somehow in the interest of the U.S government,

they are fighting for what they believe in, you are fighting for what the government believes in..

Edited April 7, 201214 yr by Slimory

This topic can lead no where but a flame war. But to clarify, the Afghanistani military is on our side. It isn't so much an invasion as it is a cleanup.

Edited April 8, 201214 yr by Codz

the Al quiada doesn't see it that way

I personally somewhat support war. It's okay for certain reasons such as stopping Nuclear Energy or power.

As for the gas station problem, she's seen to many movies. Damn racist idiots. I'm fine with it, I like meating people from different places. It's nice to here what they have to say.

Especially Canada, I've always wanted to go there, and I almost did once...But I missed the bridge...

the Al quiada doesn't see it that way

They are a single group of extremists. They don't represent an entire country.

They are a single group of extremists. They don't represent an entire country.

a single group who have influence over an entire country, they do have supporter's, and afghanistan/pakistan/iraq are not small places.

@the ninja, i was only using the gas station as an example, it's not the first time it has happened, in my opinion, there is a certain arrogance about them, it really doesn't bother me anymore.

I believe the only threat that poses to the United States is Iran with their nuclear technology or China with its shear numbers in its military. I pray that whoever is running the country for the next 4 years decides against war. We have lost too many heroes in combat. War with China is basically an instant surrender as they have a billion soldiers to throw at us. Declaring war with either of these countries is considered WW3 in my mind...

Edited April 8, 201214 yr by wmai20

Hell, we could do it. I mean, we've gotten through WWI and II without losing U.S.A. and Canada. So, bring it on. WW3 can rein, we'd come out with our flag waving through the air. We could win, help Canada too, maybe even Afghan. (LOL). If we have won many battles, we can do that. Maybe it does take us ten years to kill Osama, so, at least we did it. We have the technology. We have the trust, the Marines (yup, that's you wmai), the Navy SEAL's, USAF, we have guns. Even if there was going to be a WWIII, we could still hold our ground, win a few battles, and say hi to the other countries. We could win against China, if anything happened. But I doubt they will have a major attempt at North America. We could do it. Fight our way through. We have shelter, some grenades, a few AC-130's and a whole load of guns. They have guns, and shit too, but not like ours. We are proud to be North American!

If we are attacked, we're going to be okay.

Hell, we could do it. I mean, we've gotten through WWI and II without losing U.S.A. and Canada. So, bring it on. WW3 can rein, we'd come out with our flag waving through the air. We could win, help Canada too, maybe even Afghan. (LOL). If we have won many battles, we can do that. Maybe it does take us ten years to kill Osama, so, at least we did it. We have the technology. We have the trust, the Marines (yup, that's you wmai), the Navy SEAL's, USAF, we have guns. Even if there was going to be a WWIII, we could still hold our ground, win a few battles, and say hi to the other countries. We could win against China, if anything happened. But I doubt they will have a major attempt at North America. We could do it. Fight our way through. We have shelter, some grenades, a few AC-130's and a whole load of guns. They have guns, and shit too, but not like ours. We are proud to be North American!

If we are attacked, we're going to be okay.

Better idea: We try to not get into a war with Iran or China. By doing so, we save countless American lives.

@theninja, i think i proved my point lol

@cp:

Well, if they want to use Nuclear Energy, and Nuke us, we might still have to fight.

@Slimory: I was talking to wmai. lol.

Or we could fund these guys so they are less likely to attack us. And if a nuclear war starts, especially between countries with many warheads (like, say, US and China), we're all fucked.

Ahahahahahahahahaha! AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

[straight face]

We're not all fucked.

[/straight face]

Especially when war starts with Nukes flying overhead, and Chinese war planes firing at our tanks, and...and...Fuck, I have nothing.

Edited April 8, 201214 yr by theninja35

Iran has as many weapons as Iraq had in 2002. Their officials are denying the development of one, and if they were, they are not dumb enough to launch one when their neighbor and enemy Israel has over 300 nuclear missiles. If they were developing one, they would be doing it for protection, because the US has over 54 major bases surrounding Iran and it has invaded 2 countries nearby.

About WW3, it is suicide to try to start one. One major player that is being ignored in the discussion of this is Russia. It has the second most nuclear weapons and is allied with Iran, China, India and Pakistan, 3 of those being nuclear powers. Russia is not afraid to start a nuclear war, as evidenced when NATO troops started slaughtering Russian troops in Georgia in 2008. Russia kept a level head and raised their nukes, politely telling the military to F off. WW3 would be the end of the world because of the massive amount of nuclear weapons that would be used.

On Al-Qaeda, its not Iran that supports them. It is us. We put Al-Qaeda in charge in Libya, Egypt, and our government is admitting to support supporting them in Syria and Iran(more self defense by Iranians). This is why Russia deployed 2,000 Spetznaz to Syria and why we will not and should not intervene.

I feel Nuke weapons/nuclear ware fare is way over hyped, it would take ALOT to get a country, even one as crazy as Iran, to actually launch one, everyone is too scared to actually do it, I cannot remember this quote, but I remember seeing a quote on Cod4 about nukes, went something like this:

Nuclear weapons are never meant to go off, there mean to sit safely, inside their silos, to simply scare everyone else.

@Slimory, all this thread is doing is slinging stereotypes and preconceptions. It is wrong and ignorant to believe that all Americans want war.

@c13: Your comment sort of implies that Russia, Iran, China, India, and Pakistan are all allied. While many of them are, India and Pakistan are less allied than just about any other pair of countries on Earth.

@Codz: Agreed.

I feel Nuke weapons/nuclear ware fare is way over hyped, it would take ALOT to get a country, even one as crazy as Iran, to actually launch one, everyone is too scared to actually do it, I cannot remember this quote, but I remember seeing a quote on Cod4 about nukes, went something like this:

Nuclear weapons are never meant to go off, there mean to sit safely, inside their silos, to simply scare everyone else.

Okay, the problem is, even when different countries say, "Oh yeah, we're going to nuke you" sometimes they really start to do things such as:

A: Fly planes with nuclear weapons around the opponent's country.

B: Pull out certain weapons and do attempt at starting a war

C: Shoot.

Even for answer A: There was a plane with nuclear weapons in it that crashed in the US a year or two ago, from what I remember. I think it killed at least 100 civilians.

There are dangerous people out there, and people are getting crazier and changing because of our technology now. Osama could have done nukes, but instead, took a plane into a building/put bombs in the WTC and lit them up. Honestly, I don't think that should have ever happened. Only a few days ago, a fighter jet crashed into a full apatment complex, not sure if it was by accident or on purpose. But still, crazy shit like that can lead to nukes. So, we have to be careful. And the other countries do too.

There are dangerous people out there, and people are getting crazier and changing because of our technology now. Osama could have done nukes, but instead, took a plane into a building/put bombs in the WTC and lit them up. Honestly, I don't think that should have ever happened. Only a few days ago, a fighter jet crashed into a full apatment complex, not sure if it was by accident or on purpose. But still, crazy shit like that can lead to nukes. So, we have to be careful. And the other countries do too.

No Osama couldn't have. He didn't have access to surplus nukes or anywhere near the tech and manpower to produce them. The F/A-18D crash was a training accident.

Even for answer A: There was a plane with nuclear weapons in it that crashed in the US a year or two ago, from what I remember. I think it killed at least 100 civilians.

It didn't crash, 0 people died, the whole issue was just that a USAF plane was even flying in the US with nukes aboard.