One of the symbols that you refer to as "symbol of illuminati" is probably The Eye of Providence, which is a all-seeing eye. A fitting name for Illuminati, of course, but the symbol is also associated with God, for example which in religion is a all seeing entity. 

 

Also, why would the Illuminati drop clues about their existance when their apparent goal is to remain secret and control the world from the shadows. It wouldn't make sense for them to drop clues just about everywhere. That's my opinion though. 

Yes thats a good point, but if they didn't want to be known about, then how do we know they exist? From all the clues they leave behind, you see them in everyday life!

If a group is supposed to be so powerful and secretive to the point where it could potentially "capture" the entire planet, why would we all know about it? Illuminati is a bunch of crap, and I hate when people talk about the stupid "New World Order" trash. That's why we have those Asylums today. Lock those crazy people away forever.

MODERATOR NOTICE

I've just hidden a number of posts consisting of nothing more than personal attacks and flaming. If you don't have something to say about the subject of this topic, don't post.

I see a massive amount of stupidity on both sides, and quite frankly, it's no wonder I consider humanity screwed. From one side calling people "sheep" while being too stupid to string together a coherent sentence, while the other side has some calling for locking all people who dare to suggest that rich and powerful people might conspire to become more rich and powerful.

 

For starters, here's something that can't be disputed, taken directly from Cecil Rhode's first will, calling for a fund (could have later turned into the Rhodes Foundation) for the purpose for the establishment of a secret society dedicated to making Britain the controller of all the world.

 

 

To and for the establishment, promotion and development of a Secret Society, the true aim and object whereof shall be for the extension of British rule throughout the world, the perfecting of a system of emigration from the United Kingdom, and of colonisation by British subjects of all lands where the means of livelihood are attainable by energy, labour and enterprise, and especially the occupation by British settlers of the entire Continent of Africa, the Holy Land, the Valley of the Euphrates, the Islands of Cyprus and Candia, the whole of South America, the Islands of the Pacific not heretofore possessed by Great Britain, the whole of the Malay Archipelago, the seaboard of China and Japan, the ultimate recovery of the United States of America as an integral part of the British Empire, the inauguration of a system of Colonial representation in the Imperial Parliament which may tend to weld together the disjointed members of the Empire and, finally, the foundation of so great a Power as to render wars impossible, and promote the best interests of humanity.

 

 

And for the people saying the illuminati or other societies are too well known to prosper, you're displaying the one of the exact actions that would make such a society so successful. Things can easily hide in plain sight, depending on how much they are reported. One of the best things about the internet is that it is much harder to hide things. One example is the Bilderberg Group.

 

You would think that a meeting of 150 the world's most powerful media moguls, technological geniuses, politicians, royalty and top advisers (a felony for US politicians to attend in secret under the Logan Act) would be major news in the celebrity worshiping culture of today. Yet, until recently, the media was in total denial about such a group, with only a few articles recently coming out, mostly about security there (1,2,3).

 

Again, in today's culture, why would so many famous people meeting together be mostly ignored?

 

But the primary reason why any such society is so successful is because of the polarization effect in the world today. The average "researcher" repeats shit they heard from Alex Jones and believes being a raging lunatic who can't be rational is the only way to "wake people up", and the average "sheep" is turned away from the raging lunatics, towards the hand of the all loving government who would never look to harm anyone.

You want something to be said about the subject of this topic? Okay.

 

I think the Illuminatii is bullshit. It's nothing more than an excuse to attack past and present political figures & celebrities. People use the Illuminatii to turn tragedies & political turmoil into propaganda schemes. One instance could be 9/11. People will say that since George Bush is an active member of the Illuminatii, he was told to attack the World Trade Center by his superiors. Countless numbers of humans, notice I'm not specifically saying Americans because that would be completely inaccurate as many different people from other nations, had died because of the events taking place on September 11th, 2001. Conspiracy theorists will take that genocide of human life and turn it around saying, "The Illuminatii wants to start a new world order, so they needed to end all those lives". They would be taking the significance of all that unnecessary human life lost, and completely tarnish it with some baseless theories on why it meant to be.

 

That's my opinion. Disagree with it or not, I don't care.

 

Do you know why I said what I had said cp702? Because it hurts me to see this website's forum go down hill when a bunch of immature 12 year olds discuss why the Illuminatii is controlling the world. I felt the need to say what I said because I knew nobody else had the balls to do it. And you just hid it like it was nothing.

 

On top of that, there's going to be constant junk-posting in this thread, and you and the majority of other staff will not do a single thing about it until it's too late.

 

Go ahead, just watch as this thread takes a turn for the worse and is constantly bombarded with fragmented sentences that have the grammatical significance of that of a child's writing. I doubt this thread discussing "politics, current events, and society" will get anywhere more significant.

 

EDIT; Made post more appropriate by replacing somewhat offense phrases.

Edited February 16, 201412 yr by Jewish_Banana

You want something to be said about the subject of this topic? Okay.

 

I think the Illuminatii is bullshit. It's nothing more than an excuse to attack past and present political figures & celebrities. People use the Illuminatii to turn tragedies & political turmoil into propaganda schemes. One instance could be 9/11. People will say that since George Bush is an active member of the Illuminatii, he was told to attack the World Trade Center by his superiors. Countless numbers of humans, notice I'm not specifically saying Americans because that would be completely inaccurate as many different people from other nations, had died because of the events taking place on September 11th, 2001. Conspiracy theorists will take that genocide of human life and turn it around saying, "The Illuminatii wants to start a new world order, so needed to end all those lives". They would be taking the significance of all that unnecessary human life lost, and completely tarnish it with some baseless theories on why it meant to be.

 

That's my opinion. Disagree with it or not, I don't care.

 

Do you know why I said what I had said cp702? Because it hurts me to see this website's forum go down hill when a bunch of mongoloid 12 year olds discuss why the Illuminatii is controlling the world. I felt the need to say what I said because I knew nobody else had the balls to it. And you just hid it like it was nothing.

 

On top of that, there's going to be constant shit-posting in this thread, and you and the rest of moderators will not do a single thing about it until it's too late.

 

Go ahead, just watch as this thread takes a turn for the worse and is constantly bombarded with fragmented sentences that have the grammatical significance of that of a child's writing. I doubt this thread discussing "politics, current events, and society" will get anywhere more significant.

I agree.

Interesting 'debate' nonetheless...