Hystery

Photoshop remains the best, but first it demands a certain dexterity and knowledge of picture editing, and second the license can be pretty expensive. Not that it's difficult to find it for free of course, if you know where to look, but yeah.

Linking the account is a feature that has been discontinued since a while if I'm not mistaken. And as long as you don't experience crashes, having a read at your logs is unnecessary, since your game runs fine. It's only once you start getting random crashes that it's important to provide your logs. As it is, I don't see the use for it.

Are you experiencing unexplained crashes to begin with?

Je te conseille d'aller voir des tutos installation sur Youtube pour te guider pas à pas et te familiariser avec le modding. Tu auras beaucoup plus d'explications claires sur une vidéo qui te montre quoi faire que sur un forum à suivre des étapes un peu abstraites si tu t'y connais pas trop.

That's not an opinion, that's facts. That's literally what happened. You can't choose not to acknowledge it just to advance your own political agenda, it doesn't work like that. But you obviously won't listen anyway so I'll leave it at that.

Remove Policehelper. Done.

Really? Really though? Let me tell you a little story. Let's say a guy comes out of a street with a truck and decides to run over the crowd on the sidewalk. The SECOND medias would happen to know he's of arabic origin, EVERY media on Earth, every single one of them, will spam the "TERRORIST ATTACK", "TERROR IN [CITY]", "ISLAMIST TERRORIST", even though they actually know absolute-freaking-ly nothing of the guy and what actually happened. Now let's take the exact same story. A guy comes out of a street with a truck and decides to run over the crowd on the sidewalk. The SECOND medias would happen to know he's caucasian... nothing. No catchy TERRORIST logo, no TERROR ATTACK band passing on the bottom of the screen, absolutely nothing. They'll just say they don't have many info yet, and that the guy might be mentally unstable, and then they'll start blaming his difficult childhood and shit. It'd take them DAYS to eventually call him a terrorist, if they do it at all. The first scenario was Nice. The second scenario was Finsbury Park, London, where a white male drove into a crowd of innocent muslims in front of a mosque with a van. Yes, both happened, and medias reacted exactly like this. Medias tell and show us all the time how great Islam is? I don't think so. Another proof that you actually do NOT know what you're talking about, you're just repeating what you hear here and there from alt-news "journalists" and xenophobic politics. No, you definitely don't, and I can say that because of all the inaccuracies and shortcuts you've been taking so far in every single one of your posts. You absolutely have no idea how they think and how they live. You THINK you know, the difference is there, but your view on them is solely based on biased stereotypes and a very, very small minority of people.

Fact is, there aren't muslim. And I'll prove it with 3 easy steps. 1/ The attack in Nice, with the truck, killed several muslims. It doesn't make sense for a supposed muslim to kill another muslim for Islam. 2/ The attack in London happened during Ramadan. Ramadan is a sacred period for every muslim. Not respecting it is considered a serious sin. Terrorists did not respect one of their supposed most sacred customs. Therefore they aren't muslims. 3/ The Great Mosque of al-Nuri, in Mosul, is one of the most sacred temple dedicated to Islam. ISIS dynamited it and reduced it in a pile of rubble. No muslim would do that. Fact is, terrorists are crazy brainwashed motherfuckers who were mentally unbalanced even before they ever thought about comitting a crime such as a terror attack. Think about that. No, most of them do care about our traditions. How I know that? Because if that wasn't the case, we would have 4.7 millions people living by middle east standards here in France, and that's simply not the case. You just take the minority who indeed doesn't wish to be assimilated in the population and treat it as the standard value to judge all muslims or people of arabic origin. That's not how it works. Wrong. Saint Denis is actually a perfect example for me, so thank you for mentioning it. Do you know what is Saint Denis? Saint Denis is a city where 27% of the population is living beneath the poverty threshold (country average: +/-10%), meaning they have less than 1000 euros per month to live (that means less than 1k euros per month to pay the bills, pay the food, pay the clothes, pay the insurances, etc). Another stat? Saint Denis is a city where the unemployment rate is standing at a beautiful 24% of the active population (country average: ~10%). And do you know what happens in cities where poverty and unemployment are in high numbers? Crime. This is unrelated to skin color or religion. This is sociology. Think about that. Because other religions are SO much better, amirite? Christianism for example which, during the crusades, perpetrated the first genocides of jewish people, and slaughtered hundreds of thousands of people in the name of the Christ. Or with all those white supremasists who slaughtered black people in the US and in the world in the name of their god. Or with their priests who molest children. What? Yes, only a minority do that. But since you seem to judge all muslims only from the actions of a handful of them, I can do the same, can't I? Your double-standards are off the charts. If you accept one religion, you accept all religions, because they ALL have flaws, they ALL have violence in them, without a single exception. I invite you to google 'violent quotes from bible', I'm sure you'll be entertained. I can confidently say that you don't judging by what you've said so far. Please. Stop repeating what you're hearing on xenopobic, racist websites or alt-news networks, and try to make your own opinion by seeing the larger picture, and not through the narrow point of view of just a handful of people who actually know absolutely nothing of what they're talking about.

Let me correct you: "before ISIS started their online propaganda in western countries, we didn't experience any attacks". Not before Europe was "flooded". And of course armed police officers will NOT stop terrorists immediately. Police officers cannot predict where terrorists will strike, and if they happen, by chance, to be on the scene when something happens, they don't have a 100% accuracy, they don't have a 100% success rate, and they certainly won't do anything if the terrorist happens to have something like a truck right away. Guns don't stop or prevent terrorism. They never will. Look at 9/11. Would guns have prevented two planes from crashing? Do you think a police officer in NYC could have shot down the planes to prevent them from crashing? Of course not. Guns won't, ever, prevent or stop terrorism. That's a hard fact, and you can't choose to acknowledge it or not, because it simple IS. Really? Would you happen to know better than me what happens in my own country? Let me ask you a question. Do you know what is the part of the population who happens to be muslim in France? Would you know that? Of course not. It's 7.5%. Roughly 4.7 millions people. Out of 65 millions. Part of the population that is muslim AND immigrant? Below 1% "FULL OF ASS WIPES FROM ORIENT", you said. Well, hard fact again for you: NOPE. Sorry to shatter your biased vision of the world, but that ain't the case.

Actually, many of the terrorists were either born in the country they decided to attack, or born within the EU. The 'Immigrants are the reason for the terror attacks' is an hoax, spread by alt-news and xenophobic websites and medias. Besides, as I explained before, guns don't stop terrorist attacks. You can't shoot an idea, a propaganda. You don't fight terrorism with guns, you fight terrorism with counter-propaganda campaigns and excellent intellgience services. But not with guns on regular police officers.

You'll always find people making non-ELS models, for a reason or another. But let's be honest, they're a very minority, so don't expect an avalanche of non-ELS vehicles from now on.

You'll still need to install vanilla models that have been mapped to support liveries.

It was related to your previous comment stating that, I quote: "I've never seen a bunch of far right people who try to destroy a million city." I notified you that WWII is literally that, amongst other things, therefore your argument of "lefts destroy things, right don't" is false. Wasn't complaining so far, just asking that you don't put everyone in the same basket. I know it's a common trend nowadays to just put people in cases, but it doesn't make it any less wrong. Antifascists are exactly like fascists: idiots. But just like I don't put fascists and rightists in the same basket, I'd expect people to not put antifa and leftists in the same basket either, because besides a few common ideas, they're nothing alike really.

Guess you've never heard of WWII then. Also, thanks for not calling far lefts cancer. You don't see me shouting "All right wings are meritocratic biggots that are the cancer of humanity". I'd ask for the same respect in return. My ideas would be considered far left, yet you won't see me burning cars or trying to harm other people. Don't put everyone in the same basket, you'll be kind.

I wonder if it's time to dig up some Pico pictures.

Oh that's an easy one! Forums where there wouldn't be weeaboos lurking in the shadows and ready to hunt you down to steal your soul and condemn you to become one of them for eternity.

... :)

If even the cadets start acting like thugs and robbing their own department, no wonder the police reputation is going downhill. They're a shame to their profession. Or well, ex-future profession.

So T2 openly admits they are a bunch of idiots for saying OpenIV allowed for "malicious online mods", and that their excuse for taking down OpenIV was a complete and utter lie. What a beautiful company of retards.

To be fairly honest, our cops in France have a handgun each (and recently even constables have been allowed to carry a weapon, before they were allowed to carry only tasers). And as you can see, it didn't prevent anything from happening. Arming the police against terrorism isn't going to solve anything IMO. Terrorism isn't fought like regular crimes. You can't shoot an ideology. To fight terrorism, you need excellent intelligence services, and a permanent deconstruction of the ISIS myth found on the internet, where most of their recruitments are done. But a gun? Meh. After Paris and Nice, I can definitely say it doesn't help.

You know that not only medias are responsible for the bad reputation of the US police, right? The police ranks aren't made of an homogeneous entity of good-doers, there is a bunch of despicable individuals amongst them that tarnish their reputation. If people have a bad reputation of the US police, maybe it means that said police doesn't do its job properly at some point. I digress, but I wanted to point that out. As for your question, I'm not a UK citizen, but know a bunch of british people, and from what I know the british police is respected, much more than in other european countries.

Whatever makes you sleep at night, Mr Conspiracy.

Indeed, I'm not going to win this argument if you start using conspiracy theories as "puppet bush" and the like and call them "facts". The fact is, your country voted to pass the patriot act after 9/11. Period. That, is a fact. So to see a US citizen use the Benjamin Franklin quote is pretty amusing, to say the least. I'll just drop it there. Don't hesitate to poke me when you're actually willing to use real facts and not alternative facts like mister Orange or conspiracy theories.

Says a US citizen with the patriot act voted after the terrorist attacks of the twin towers. That's kinda ironic that you dare to use this quote from Benjamin Franklin, don't you think? Guns save lives. 'k man, if you say so. As for the invasion of my country, I'm not worried.

Having more guns wouldn't solve anything of all that. Dunno if you're aware, but here in France, our army is dispatched all over the country. Not the police, the army. We actually have more soldiers on duty within our borders than out of them, which has never happened since WWII. They're armed with FAMAS, handguns, flashballs, flashbangs. Guess what? It didn't stop the terrorist attacks from happening. Because guns don't magically solve things, guns aren't magic wands.