Cyan

There are some examples here: https://github.com/LMSDev/LSPDFR-API/tree/master/API Examples You cannot use VB script at all. You could however use VB.NET, however this is so different from VB script that you might as well learn C#. Plus, all the examples are in C#.

It has been made internally to suit our needs. It is our first big project on IPS4. I'm unsure about making it available for purchase, it's currently pretty specific to LCPDFR.com.

I'm sorry you're having those issues, but I simply cannot replicate that on my end.

Works fine for me. It is a redirect which is operating as per expected.

Not intentionally, but looks like there's a bug that means you have to. I'll probably iron this out on Monday.

I think offline mode will only last about a week before requiring to go back online, though.

Why would we want to integrate them into the LSPDFR core? It gives us more work to do.

Your topic has been moved to GTA V Support, this is not LSPDFR related. Please post in the correct location in the future.

We don't comment on release dates.

You shouldn't really be using a version of Rage Plugin Hook that LSPDFR hasn't been compiled against.

It looks like models can be unlocked and edited using older versions of Zmodeler, like @Yard1 predicted. Anyway, this shifts the debate back to LCPDFR.com itself, and what we'll do (or not do) about locked models, as we're now forced to have the debate internally as this is now an option.

The linking server is not running. Since there is no way to track stats online, it's pointless anyway. If there is enough user demand we may bring it back, but most people seem to not care due to LSPDFR.

No, I'm telling you that's how the system currently works. It will not cut off a download after an hour if the download is already happening.

It isn't a problem. Please refer to the User Documentation PDF that comes with LCPDFR..

The limitation should only apply from when the download is started. If the download is already in progress, the 1 hour limitation should not apply.

Should be sorted.

No modification based on Scripthook V or RPH can provide true multiplayer compatibility. Even if RPH allowed scripts to run online, it wouldn't improve the situation much, really. Only a project like FiveM can provide true synchronized online play. Right now we are keeping a keen eye on FiveM to see when it gets to a state in which we could consider an online version. FiveM and GTA-MP are about a year away from being anywhere near complete enough to even consider.

As you may know, we're working on an redesign of our downloads system. One of the features this will have is the ability to change the downloads portal to the show a certain game only.

Then that really speaks volumes about the performance of AMD processors, if those are physical cores, then by god what is the excuse for the piss-poor performance.

SSL isn't supported here, so simply don't use it. Make sure you are using http://www.lcpdfr.com not https://www.lcpdfr.com.

One of our secondary servers are down due to an attack, meaning secondary domains like lspdfr.com are not working. There is no issue with www.lcpdfr.com, that goes through our primary server, however there may be an issue with lcpdfr.com (without the www). We don't recommend using the non-www version, anyway. Your second problem is due to the fact that edge isn't supported. For lack of getting too technical, Edge exhibits automatic behaviours which appear suspicious to our DDoS protection system, meaning that it will be blocked. I guess we'll fix this when we get time, for now use Chrome (hell even IE should work if you really want to stick to MS).

Custom cars and sirens will degrade IV's performance and cause crashes. IV itself is not very stable, adding 3D modifications tends to make it even more so.

Uhh. LCPDFR doesn't use Rage Plugin Hook.

Most of the octa-core CPUs from AMD are a lie. They only have 4 CU (compute units). So you essentially have 4 cores with 8 threads to access them. It does increase performance (kind of, mostly because applications are written badly) but only in the same way that a quad-core hyperthreading Intel processor would.