Cyan

Your topic has been moved to GTA V Support, this is not LSPDFR related. Please post in the correct location in the future.

Your topic has been moved to LSPDFR 0.4 Support. Please post in the correct location in the future.

You'd have to ask the author.

Your topic has been moved to LSPDFR 0.4 Support. Please post in the correct location in the future.

Your topic has been moved to LSPDFR 0.4 Support. Please post in the correct location in the future.

We can definitely add that in, yup.

If you're using LSPDFR plugins that override LSPDFR's arrest behavior, the count won't increment.

Your topic has been moved to LSPDFR 0.4 Support. Please post in the correct location in the future.

Complete the prologue, no?

It just came out today, right? Why don't you try it and see? I've not looked into it at all -- but if it doesn't work, then you will have to wait if/when a patch is released.

Have a look around the FiveM community, the forums have a server bazaar you can find servers in. I'm closing this for now as it may lead to other members advertising.

Full RAGEPluginHook.log file please.

Right now LSPDFR is single player only.

Your topic has been moved to LSPDFR 0.4 Support. Please post in the correct location in the future.

That's what I was talking about in my reply, the next version of our board software will have this natively that we can turn on for certain boards.

Our board software does provide something like this out of the box, with the ability to upvote answers and mark as solved. We can switch the forum to use a Q&A format. The problem is the format doesn't make much sense when issues are more complex and require a decent amount of go-between between the person asking for help and people helping. The good news is the next version of our board software provides support for marking answers without converting the entire forum to a Q&A format, so we should have this when this is released.

The log you posted shows LSPDFR running successfully. We'd need the most recent log.

You'd have to get it from the author. Nobody else would have permission to give the author's work to you.

Your topic has been moved to LSPDFR 0.4 Support. Please post in the correct location in the future.

Glad it's fixed. I will take a look anyway 👍

To protect our community, certain ISPs are blocked. There are a few blocks that exist on LCPDFR.com: Hard blocks: These are blocks we place on entire ISPs where we have found that receive huge levels of abuse with them with little recourse. For example, certain server companies will not acknowledge or act on abuse reports, a minimum expected service. For security reasons, these blocks don't generally get lifted. Interactivity blocks: These are blocks we place on entire ISPs where we have found that they do not provide residential ISP services. For example, less problematic server companies and less problematic VPN companies. These blocks will not allow registration / logins from these ranges, and can sometimes trigger manual approval of content. These blocks don't get lifted unless we find evidence that they supply residential ISP services. Individual blocks (IP or account): These are blocks we apply on individual users for violating our community guidelines repeatedly. These blocks are generally lifted after 6 months. Unfortunately, from the reference number shown in your screenshot, the particular block is a hard block. That means the server company has been used to spam/abuse LCPDFR.com and we haven't had any response from the ISP.

Can you let me know which LCPDFR.com server you're connect to? You can find this out by highlighting over the bug icon on the lower right.

This topic has been closed because you are asking for support regarding pirated software. We are unable to provide support to pirates, or people using cracks. If you feel this topic has been closed in error, please report this post.

Only actions made using LSPDFR itself are counted. Actions from third party plugins which changes LSPDFR core functionality will not currently be counted.

We've fixed the technical issues and added some redundancy so this shouldn't happen again.