Richard Noggin

So only Guantanamo? A facility that has been winding down it's opperations and removing prisoner's and that has faced huge scrutiny both at home and abroad for fhe actions done under the bush administration. I've never forgotten about what happened there nore has many other's. What I am complaining about is the hypocrisy that the U.N. has always been. The Israel situation is a good example of even if we did complain about Saudi Arabia that the council would do nothing. They bash, condem and wish for the destruction of Israel while praising and helping the Palestinians. If the council fails to stand up for Israel but praises the Palestinians, then even attempting to bring up a point about Saudi Arabia is going to fail too. The member's on the council favor certain group's over other's and the Israeli/ Palestinian or the U.S./ Soviet issue's are perfect examples. Yes I am saying that it has been hijacked by the "MEMBER'S" in the U.N. to push their political goals. I do recognise that it is the member's that are a huge issue within the U.N. but the U.N. in itself is also a major issue since it's founding and the only way to correct those issues is to get rid of it. The U.N. sounded like a good idea but, in reality, it is a terrible outcome from desperate people to try and form a organization with the hopes of keeping nation's from dragging us into another world war that causes nothing but pain and suffering. In reality some of the worst nation's have gained voting power's within the U.N. and pressed for their image to be spread around the world without consequence. I get it, the U.N. sounds good on paper but when you look at what has been done with it, you find out that it is a broken machine that cannot be fixed. And what do you do with something that cant be fixed? You scrap it.

No you were not, and we, the U.S., have raised concerns about the actions of other's on multiple occasions and what the assemble has done is continue to fail to act in accordance. They have done this since the beginning of it's founding, and never stopped aiding criminal actions. The double standard here is the General Assembly putting nations on the human rights councel that have human rights violations themselves. And please tell me what is soo hypocritical that the U.S. does? We have been the top producer of fund's to the U.N. since its founding. While we threw 100 million into the U.N. the Soviet union put 8 million into it and the U.N. repeatedly gave the Soviet union 10 million in reimbursements. When we agreed to the treaties that were put in place and we didn't violate them, yet the Soviet union and her allies continued to violate these treaties, the U.N. would turn the other cheek. When we denied going into treaty talks the U.N. would scold us for giving up on humanity yet at the same time she would allow Castro and his cronies to murder thousands of people that did not hold his political beliefs. The U.N. can say what ever it wants to describe itself, but the fact remains that the U.N. has done nothing to stop wars nor prevent them. She stood by as Chairman Mao Zedong ordered his men to murder millions, as the Rwandan genocide happened, condemned Rhodesia for her independence and called her a criminal state while allowing Russia and China to train and supply communist force's that did in fact commit horrid act's to push their agenda. She did nothing when Castro ordered political prisoners and their family's to be exicuted, but spits at us for putting a embargo on cuba. The U.N. is the issue and will always be the issue, she is hijacked and used for political goals with no real goal of helping anyone. More has been done by individual nations and private entities than what the U.N. has done. The EU was suppost to be a trading block ment to combat the USSR and somewhere down the line your leaders gave it more power and it is the mess that it is today. The EU is just as jacked up as the U.N. the USSR and what my government the U.S. has become today.

Actually the U.S. could not do anything about the council since it is the General Assembly that votes who is seated and each member of the General Assembly only has 1 vote. Yes Saudi Arabia is a Ally of the U.S. but that doesn't mean that we Americans can't criticize the U.N. for calling out Israel for her crimes while letting Palestine, Saudi Arabia, China, Cuba, Zimbabwe and Venezuela commit crimes of their own. (those nations are just a example of places that should be called out) The U.N. is truly a joke that should no longer exist, they bash certain people while allowing others to commit horrible acts that that should anger everyone in this world.

No surprise, The U.N. is a joke in itself.

When did I say that it was justified? When did I defend him? Stop jumping to conclusions without thinking about shit. I was just pointing it out, I am not a police apologist. You sir need to take a chill pill. Some of you people on here need stop putting words in peoples mouths. Freaking childish

Yea, that was intentional, he was trying to make a point.

Just because something is designed to kill someone is not an argument to restrict it. Swords were designed to kill people and you don't argue against them. And I am not if favor or phychos having guns, but punishing me and forcing me to be evaluated, registered, and restricted will not stop anyone from doing anything bad. Just because someone is ok one day does not mean that they are good another day. If I am at a store and someone enters with the intent to shoot people and I use my firearm to stop them, how would that of stopped anything? We live in a country with guns, and taking steps to restrict lawful people from owning guns will only empower the criminal. I have an issue with it because people would say that me thinking that I need a certain gun for self defense against other's is not a reason to own a gun. And my distrust of my government could also be a reason to keep me from owning the guns that I want. I have guns for self defence, from a Glock 19 to an AR15, and there are people that do not agree with me for having these guns. There are many people that think I should be limited to a 5 shot pistol or a 10 round rifle magazine. I don't, I feel that it is better to have more rounds and not use them, than to have less rounds and need more. Then why is it that people get stabbed and beat to death? You are focusing on one tool that could be used by someone to kill someone. The point still stands, if you want to inflict harm upon other's, you don't need a gun to do so. 9/11, Boston, and the recent bombings in Texas. Banning guns or requiring mental evaluations wouldn't stop it. You have to be prepared for the worst and hope that you can react to it. Then why do you do your battle cry when there is a school shooting? Why not when there are shootings, stabbings, or beatings? Everyone cries when someone shoots up a school, church, base, etc. No one brings up these issue's any other time. It is not irrelevant, you cannot expect to stop people from doing BAD thing's by registering a certain group of people. Me doing mental evaluations won't stop the gang's from shooting other gang's. And when none of those work the law failed. When someone rapes someone and never gets caught, the law fails. It can only be used after the fact. I am not mixing anything, if these law's worked, then the crime that persist would be no more, yet the crime continues and people are only brought to justice after caught. When the fuck was I for banning gays from being married? Never, I have been against any form of refusing to allow people to marry since I was a child and I have voiced my opinion on why the state should never restrict gays from marrage. It was a form of slavery and I have been vocal with my reps since I was young. Gays, just like blacks, wer barred from being free individual's because someone seen fit that they should be forced to live in their image. I am against that. Live and let live is my motto. You live the way that you live until you start infringing upon mine, and it will be YOU, not an object, that will come into questions for your actions. It is not my position to say who you can love, if you are a man and you love another man or if you are a woman and you love another woman and wish to marry then do so, that is not my position to deny you that. I personally see no reason, exept for control, that the State is involved in marriage at all. If you want to be gay, HURRAY, it doesn't bother, harm, or disrupt me. When you start forcing me, to live by your beliefs, then I have an issue. You live your life the way you see fit and so will I. I want everyone here to know that I am not just an advocate for owning guns but my beliefs, in Individual Freedom, spreads farther than just owning guns. I find that Individual Liberty will alway's come before anything else and it is my belief that if we want the government to do something for us then we should hold them to the highest scrutiny. Same here.

So you think, that if I want to own an Glock and an AR, in order to defend myself, it is as equal to you wanting to own nukes? Hmmm.... Not me or millions of other firearm owners. Maybe you should look at the evil individual, that you can't find. Not the gun. What do you want? Everyone to be chained up and unable to cause any harm to other's? And when you shoot someone, you have to know where to shoot them. Just because you shoot someone it does not mean that they will die. It is not hard to stab someone, even to death. And it is not hard to drive a car, even if it is to try and kill people. Your argument is flawed and irrelevant because you continue to fail to acknowledge that people can be killed with other thing's than guns. This whole topic is only an issue because of some middle class kids that got killed. You would never publicly argue this case in my neighborhood, which on fact most people have guns in order to stop the criminals that wish to do harm to them. And you don't need a permit to drink then get into a car and drive then run a stop light and kill people. You have no argument. You can kill people with just about anything and you cannot protect people from criminals.

So you find it more important to not make sure that school's are safe and would rather allow anyone to come in and leave without question. My local courthouse has 5 officer's in the facility and you think that putting 2 officer's into a school with metal detectors and one way in and one way out, unless there is an emergency, is like making kid's prisoners and compairing that to Area 51? You are delusional, protect your politicians better than your kid's, don't even try to protect them in any way that you wish to protect other's in this country. That is your logic. I have not once pointed anywhere near making a school area 51, LISTEN to me and stop trying to twist what I say over and over. Once again will you open your eyes up, and read what I just said, "To subjugate another individual, to live the way that you see fit, is on the same path as slavery. " Can you please tell me where in that sentence it says anything about guns? Do you find anything else in the world that he can do not possible? What if he drove a car? Do you think that if he goes into a gun shop that they will sell him a gun? It is perfectly legal to deny selling a gun to someone if you don't want to. I never said that standing up for someone is mandatory, read a little slower and you will see what I am saying, I said that we need to ENCOURAGE people to stand up for those that cannot stan up for themselves. And we also need to start teaching people to NOT be scared and encourage them to be brave. And I never talked to anyone like crap, damnit, I have not insulted anyone or looked uppon them as lesser. You are painting me a colour that I am not. I have stood up to these people and I have seen other's stand up to them too, I encourage everyone to stand up to these pricks because you are not worthless, you are a human that trys to do good and you should not let someone stomp on you or any other's. On that note, shame on you for suggesting that a looking down on other's when I continue to try and encourage people to stand up for themselves and other's. WTF do you think evil is? Mordor? If you can stop someone from attacking you, would you? When no one gets caught and tried after they do a crime, then the law that was put in place to stop them did not work. It is illegal to kill someone and yet people do it and get away with it everyday.

I do know what I am compairing school's to, and that is a government facility, ran by the government that is unguarded in most cases with little to no effort placed on the school's that house your children and the children of other's, but the security of a school seems to mean absolutely nothing to anyone. You would rather restrict me from owning what I own and have done no bad with instead of starting by protecting the school's in a manner that you wish uppon every other government facility in the country. If my method does not work then I would admit that I am wrong, but if my method stops people from entering school's and shooting children, then it would be a far better outcome than these other methods suggested. You did twist it to make it seem preposterous and a fire hazard. You act like no one has ever guarded a building before, you make it seem that the guard's emplaced at the school's would be acting like the queens guard, they wouldn't. You make it seem that the only way that we can guard school's with my method is to use only 1 officer at the school and never rotating him with other officer's at the school's. You have no idea what security looks like and refuse to open your eyes to how it work's. It would not be a prison, get that threw your head, and what the hell would a greeter do to someone that walks in with the intent to do harm to people? Say "Hi welcome to this school, we have done absolutely nothing to protect this school exept impose registration, phycye evaluations, and restrictions. Is your gun registered and did you get a licence or permit to be able to have that sir?" And guess what? Sandy hook didn't either, neither did Parkville, or Orlando, or even Columbine. When it happens is when these measures will work. Having a unarmed staff member at the door acting as security does absolutely nothing and never will to stop a shooter that waltz inside and starts shooting. If they get inside the school with a gun that they stole from their grandpa's closet or from a house that they broke into or even one they purchased from a criminal could not have been stopped if he was required to buy a permit, or get a evaluation, you are hiding the solution at hand and trying to punish other's for the actions of someone that never intended to follow the law. Sometimes getting into a little bit of trouble to stop someone from attacking you is worth it. It is called self defense. I never said to punch someone because they said some word's you do not like, I did say that "STICKS AND STONES MAY BREAK MY BONES BUT WORD'S WILL NEVER HURT ME". Think about that really hard. Someone can say all the word's to you that they want and you will not be harmed because other people's opinions do not dictate your life. Yes I do because guns are not the only things on this planet that can be USED to take someone's life away in mere milliseconds. You don't have to go to a gun shop to buy a gun, it is like saying that because I conceal a weapon without a license makes me a criminal intent on doing un-necessary harm to other's. No I am not, I am sounding like an individual that wants to be left to live my life as I see fit, just as you wish to live your life the way that you see fit. And I said to subjugate an INDIVIDUAL, to live they way that YOU see fit, is on the same path as slavery. Meaning that if you want me to do thing's in the manner that you want and I do not agree with it but still am forced to live by it, makes it slavery.

Hahaha, that's how I feel sometimes when I see something about a bomb on the news.

Agreed. To be fair, that was the only real mass shooting at a school in the UK. I do agree that a country with fewer guns does have fewer gun crimes, that is un-arguable. But that does not mean that it curved violent crime in general. Our current issue, at school's, is that one side is saying "why are the school's not guarded" and the other side saying "why do you need guns". The U.S. is an extremely different country than any other country in the world. There are soo many guns here, held by both law abiding citizens and criminals, and to punish and restrict law abiding people due to the actions of criminals does absolutely nothing to curb crime (not just gun crime). I get it, people want to feel safe, they want children to go to school's without worry of being in a school massacre. But the actions being proposed will not stop bad people from doing bad thing's because no law can stop bad people from doing bad things. That is where the issue is, people do bad thing's. I am not arguing with you, Sam, I do agree with what you have stated and they cannot be argued for they are facts and you pointed out how things are and were in the UK. I agree, that it is unacceptable for children to be slaughtered in a school, but if you know that people will do something like this and no one does anything to secure the school's, like other public facilities, then they will alway's be targeted. It is not the gun that is the issue but the way to deal with evil people is where the issue stands, and will always stand. To subjugate another individual, to live the way that you see fit, is on the same path as slavery.

I don't want to make enemies here, I just do not get why people want me to comply with their life when I do not ask them to comply with my way of life. Restricting me for actions that I have not done lables me as guilty before innocent. If I must go and prove that I am able own something prior to purchasing something, then I am restricted from it. Do you not understand that? And if you would slow down and read whay I am saying, when I mentioned free speech, is that if someone offends you with word's and you want that to stop, by using laws, then you must restrict people's right to free speech. And you obviously do not wish to remember or you want to pick and choose what I say, disregarding everything that I say, in order to create some sort of lost point. I have stated prior multiple time's that I do know that bullying is not only mental but also physical. If someone assaults you, then that is illegal and creating a law that says the same thing will do nothing to change that, it is up to YOU to press charges upon that individual, or individuals that do physical harm to you. If someone is hurting your feelings and you do not like the word's that they say to you, then you must restrict people's freedom of speech in order to stop it and charge people for saying something that you do not like. I understand what bullying is, I was bullied at one point and so were other's. It stopped when I stood up to them and took away the control and power that they had.

I am not being paranoid, you are suggesting putting a new law forth that would subjugate everyone even though they did absolutely nothing wrong. Punish the many for the actions of the few. People that commit crimes are only punished if they are caught, or reported and captured and convicted. Innocent until proven guilty. What will a law against bullying do? If the bully hits you, then he can get in trouble? That is called assault and it is already illegal. If he makes fun of you and hurts your feelings, should he be punished for that? Do you want to also start restricting other's free speech because you do not like or cannot handle what someone else says? Freedom of speech stops when you make a call to action as in, encouraging people to beat up someone because YOU said that they raped someone. You want to subjugate everyone and make it harder for people to get guns even though it will do absolutely nothing to keep a bad person from doing bad act's. I can go 1 block north of my house and buy a gun from one of the burglars, I can go 1 block south and buy a gun from one of the gang bangers. The point is that no matter what you do to try and restrict access to firearms from LAW ABIDING CITIZEN'S, you will do absolutely nothing from keeping bad people from doing bad thing's to others. I am not contradicting myself in any way, I am telling you the cold hard truth, that, no matter what law you make, no matter what the punishment is, no matter wgo you tell, your issue with bullies will not stop. People sell drug's because they want to, because it is a quick way to make money and they have the connections to the people that can supply them. We have repete offenders for a reason, because they like what they do. And NO not everyone would be a drug dealer if it was legal because people have interests in job's and they would prefer to do what they love to do than sell drug's. I know drug dealer's, I know lawyer's, I know cop's, and I know business owner's. If the law's worked, then NO ONE WOULD BE BREAKING THEM. If you go to the store and someone walks in and beats or kills you with a bat, what did restricting guns do to prevent that violent crime from happening? The guns are still there, taking them away or restricting them from me does nothing to stop a criminal from using them, not to mention that guns are not used that often in crimes. You cannot seperate gun crime from violent crime because it is the same thing. It is a tool that is used just like a bat, knife, car, hammer, or explosive device. You finally get it? They bully people because people let them and people don't stand up or fight back. And the people you tell to help wont do anything, just like you and I said. What will you do if they hurt your feelings? Restrict everyone's right to free speech because you can't handle word's? STICKS AND STONES MAY BREAK MY BONES, BUT WORD'S WILL NEVER HURT ME. Start reciting that. I should not have to explain, or undergo anything that pertains to me owning what I want. If you want that then let us have the same program's for owning a computer since people hack into and steal other people's info or lure kid's into performing sexual actions. Let us do the same thing with cars, if you drink then you are barred from owning a car since you could possibly get drunk, drive, and kill a family in a mini-van. We make people that join the military and police force undergo psychiatric evaluations because they are being entrusted with a civil duty that we, the citizen's, are entrusting them to perform on behalf of us. Me owning a gun has nothing to do with a civil duty. I am not paranoid or batshit crazy, you have gotten the gun control act of 1934, the gun control act of 1968, and the 1986 firearm owner's protection act that banned fully automatic machine guns and you even have banned 7.62x39 armour piercing rounds not even 5 years ago. We give, you take and it still is not enough because what you take is never enough. All that you will alway's want is everything with the hope that one day, in a utopian world, you can feel safe. Should wr reasonably restrict your right to vote? Should we reasonably restrict your right to free speech? Should we reasonably restrict your right to a fair trial? Should we reasonably restrict your right to practice what ever religion you practice? Should we reasonably restrict your right to unwarranted search and seizures? My point is that you will chip away at everything until there is nothing left. Be careful the grounds you tread.

Really? well to that I will say that you can fight that in the court's and usually win with little to no effort. What was soo macho about that? It is true. And it it is violent crime in general that you should be worried about. You are more likely to win the lotto than get shot or killed by someone, even with a gun. It is in fact one of the reasons as to why I do advocate for individual liberties. And yes I do believe that those group's should be able to have guns. Do you? I don't care what you think about what my family went through, you probably don't care for what the Jews or Chinese or the Mexicans, or the Native American's went through. All that does is show your true colors Why does it matter when we had to use guns to protect our freedom? The point is that we use weapons as a tool to defend freedom and preserve ourselves. I never said anything about introducing 80 million guns to Canada, but I do believe that if a individual thinks that they need or want a firearm for self defence or sport then they should not be restricted from them. Who are you or anyone else to say what I need for the defense of myself, my property, my home, or my State and Country? How am I literally wrong? I don't like fox either, I am not a Republican, I am not a Democrat, I am not a member of the NRA, I do not listen to Alex Jones, I support neither Trump or Hillary. You can bring up polls all that you want, but polling 1,000 or even 50,000 people does NOT show the beliefs of all American's. They are lies because they claim to be the opinion of most of America and they are not. Even if they used 100,000 American's, that does not in itself speak to the belief of the entire country. So yes they are lies, they are false and have never worked. These are not credible. It is you that sounds unhinged for believing that the small about of people that participate in these poll's represents the entire country as a whole. Knives and guns are tools that can be used to injure, maim or kill. I never deflected, you are backing down because i called you out with seperating crime and gun crime. A crime cannot compete with a crime for it is a crime. So if someone picks up a hammer, decides to use it as a weapon, and attacks another person with it, would it not be considered an assault weapon? I just mentioned how you can have a assault weapon, you on the other hand turned it into a subject on guns, reveling your utter dislike for firearms. I never claimed that you did. I was just showing you, from the FBI database, that rifles in general are are not used to kill soo many people. Handguns are used more in murders than rifles are, and knives are used even more. You are attacking an inanimate object that you have no knowledge about because of the belief that they are the most deadly weapon in the country. The people that use these weapons in the military and law enforcement are civilians too. I don't expect you to believe my story, but there are many more like it in this country. She didn't need the rifle but she did in fact want it. That is the main reason as to why people buy it, because they want it. I keep my AR15 outside of my safe, next to my bed, loaded and ready to go, because if someone breaks into my house and intends to do myself or my family harm I will defend myself. I have no reason to lock my rifle up and I would prefer my fiancee to be able to use her pistol to get to the rifle since it is far easier for her to use. No one knows what is best for me, except for me. I am a freeman and no one should try and control me. What didn't make sense? The government was warned, they had reason to restrict him, and they failed to enforce the law. The number of guns in circulation has nothing to do with crime period. Just because some people do horrid act's doesn't mean we should punish everyone. How about punishing all the Russians that enslaved my family? Oh wait, we cant, they were part of the allies. I was wondering if you would say that, that is the only reason I put that in there, you failed to acknowledge Athens Tennessee amd the American Revolution in favor of what some people find controversial.

I am proposing to protect the school's the same was we protect every other government facility in the U.S. And to think that you will solve the bullying issue with tougher punishments will do nothing to stop it. Bullying is a power and control issue, they do it because you allow them to and you wont fight back, and the people you tell to help will do nothing to stop him and that feeds into his power. And you are continuing to forget the part of illegally acquiring firearms by these shooters. As stated before, alot of these shooters stole there firearms or were already barred from owning them. Who do you suggest be the one's that assest the individuals that want a gun? How will you ensure that they will not put there political beliefs before anything when they evaluate people? How will this not be corrupt? I am talking about securing school's, which seems to be far too totalitarian, but redistricting my access to self defence tends to follow along the lines of common sense? Common sense is something that everyone agrees with, not what a small minority agree on. And yes these people calling for these measures are a small minority. Most American's just want to be left to live and let live without other's trying to control their lives

I know that kid's do not spend yheir lives in school, I never said that they do. There is obviously an issue with people wanting to shoot up a school to make a name for them selves and to have there story told. I am just asking for people to start protecting kid's by actually protecting them and not by trying to figure out how to understand the human psyche first. You can do alot by just locking down door's, putting in metal detectors, and adding armed, trained guards. You cant control people everywhere and the idea that making a new law that addresses mental illness will somehow stop bullies and criminals from doing horrid act's. I will first off say that I do not support any sort of gun control and I will also say that banning guns in any form does absolutely nothing to stop crime. You can try to say gun crime all you want but it is only crime and crimes are commited with knives more than they are with guns so let's talk about common sense knife control? An assault weapon is anything that can be picked up, and used as a weapon. You can turn anything into an assault weapon. In 2015, the 252 people were killed with rifles (that is all rifles not just the AR15), 269 with shotguns (we should ban them since they killed more? And 6,447 with handguns (wow the statistics are not adding up in your favor with these black assault rifles). I have used an AR15 in civilian life to save the life of another, that in it's self is a reason to own one. There is no law that would of stopped these shootings unless you call for all out confiscation. In Sandy Hook the shooter killed his mother, took the guns and killed the kid's. A background check would of not stopped that. In San Bernardino, the shooters purchased the ar15 from a friend illegally, no law stopped that. In Parkland, the shooter should of not had a gun with the laws that are on the book's and yet the Government you want to enact and enforce these law's failed to follow and prosecute these law's. In the recent Texas shooting, the gunman took his father's guns and commited these crimes. What restriction, background check, or waiting period would have made a difference? The one sole reason for the Second amendment is to allow the citizens to be able to stand up and fight against a tyrannical government just like they did in the American Revolution, Athens Tennessee, Bundy Ranch, and any other tyrannical act the goverment wishes to be forced upon us. So I should be barred from owning an AR15 or AK47 type rifle because it may somehow make a law enforcement officer safer if I, the law abiding citizen, choose to subjugate myself to the power of the state? These freedoms should not be played with like that, to enslave yourself because you somehow think that it will make other's safer is scary. Self preservation should be your highest priority and not you least priority. I am passionate about this subject because my family was rounded up and enslaved by the Russians in WW2 for having German descent even though they had been in Russia for 200 year's and swore loyalty to Russia. Only 3 of my family members survived and that is why my name is known today. My fiancee's family's country was occupied by the Germans during WW2 and were later rounded up and exicuted by Ukrainian soldiers while her grandmother was able to excape and hide. Her grandmother ended up growing up in an orphanage until she was able to make it to the U.S. and away from fascist's. Weapons, including guns and AR15's, are the point of the sword for your freedom and your voice. The founding father's of the U.S. agreed to put these in place to make sure that it is the Government who answer to the people and not the people who answer to the government. When you trust your government only the worst will happen. Your safety and security starts with you and only you. And a majority of American's do NOT support gun control or "common sense" gun control because ther is no such thing. You can poll all you want but those poll's are lies. You bashed TheDevineHustle claiming he was a stupid Fox news guy and you come back with a leftist news channel to support your wild claims. WTF?

No I do not, I am serious, start to guard the school's. Every school I went to was like this, they guarded the school's from people that wanted to do harm to us. It is a far better starting point than waiting for some politicians to bicker and do nothing. None of you have any answers exept to make a new law that will do nothing to stop people from doing horrid act's of violence. If enacting these new law's would work then start stripping every government facility of security.

Parkland had major flaws in that school and is a poor example for anything. As I stated prior, if anyone will listen, you allow 1 way in and 1 way out unless there is an emergency. At the only entrance and exit (which is 1 door) you have armed officer's and metal detectors at the door. If ANYONE wants to try and attack anyone then they must fight their way into that school. As I stated before. Go to a courthouse and see what you must do to get in. That is what should be done at these school's. Stop letting anyone and their brother into the school's without being checked.

It may be easier to massacre dozens with a gun than a knife, but it still happens with a knife. I do know that but to subjugate the entire population for the actions of a few is preposterous and wrong. The actions of others do not reflect the actions of the many. On the Fort Hood shooting, Before that shooting it was easy to bring your firearms onto a base without registering them.Soldiers who live on post must let their immediate commanders know if they have a personal firearm. All losses — or possible losses — must be reported within two hours. No concealed weapons are allowed, even with a state or county permit, and the shooter did not live on base. Now after the shooting you must register your firearms when you enter the base. But that is a major base, not a school. A base is basically a city and not a building or a few buildings, and a building or a few buildings are easier to secure than a MAJOR U.S. military installation that covers 339 sq miles unlike a school that will never come close to that size. You cannot compare a school to a U.S. Military installation.

Weird coincidence that a country drowning in knives has a high knife attack rate. Evil people will continue to do evil things no matter what you take away from them. What have I done wrong to have my guns taken or restricted from me? Nothing. I have used my guns only for good and will continue to do so. Secure the schools and these type's of actions will stop.

I understand that there are people that cannot stand up for themselves, that is why I mentioned me standing up for those who could not stand up for themselves. We need to teach people to stand up for others when they cannot stand up for themselves. We already know that telling teachers and expecting them to do something doesn't work. And if they want to go get their friends, then people need to stand up to them too. On the subject of bringing chains, bottles, and knives then that is where the officers at the front door of the school with metal detectors come into play. There are answers to these problems and they are extremely simple, but it appears that they are too simple for people to understand and they feel as if you need to create a complicated system to fix it and you don't. And the only way to fight violence is to fight it with violence. There is no other way to stop violence, you can't hug violence, you can't kiss violence, you can only fight it. If someone is attacking you, you cannot expect for them to stop attacking you by asking them nicely, you must fight back. Violence is a natural part of humanity, it is built into us and we cannot suppress it, hide it, or treat it, you must learn to combat it. For some people you just have to use brute force to get them to play right, you can't ask someone politely or use firm word's, some people only listen when you react to them with the force that they are handing out. You will never be able to control humans unless you have a hierarchy in power, while everyone else is a chained slave. You can only tap someone on the shoulder so many times until you must resort to other methods to get them to act right. When they use brute force to get there way you must respond in the same way. Just be a of good Courage.