DivineHustle

Well this is when people begin to have differentiating opinions and beliefs. I disagree with homosexuality because of my morals and values, not only because of what the Bible says. To put it in a more blunt form: I am testing 3 different children. I give Child A a stick and a bottle. I give Child B 2 sticks. I give Child C 2 bottles(water). All items of the same category are the exact same size and shape. I tell all 3 children to put one item into another, then stand when finished. The only person that could succeed in this test would be Child A. Why would only Child A succeed? Because he put the stick in the hole, he did what made sense, he did what would have been natural. In my opinion, homosexuality is not natural. If we didn't have the advanced technologies we have now, how would same-sex couples reproduce? Something called mechanical isolation is the answer. Some things just simply aren't physically possible, and when something isn't naturally possible, it can't be naturally correct.

Not understanding would be considered ignorance. Before I argue with anyone about anything, I make for certain that I understand their argument and perspective, even if I disagree with it. Rejecting an opposing argument because of self ignorance of their argument is invalid in my eyes. It's like if I were to say I oppose the Democratic party, simply because I don't know anything about it and I don't quite understand their ideology. With that being said, try to comprehend the perspective of those who oppose homosexuality before rejecting it. I fully understand why someone would support homosexuality, though I disagree with it. It isn't very difficult to understand, it's simply what we believe in. Religion, morals, values, whatever it may be. You don't need to form a testimony to create an opinion.

As I have stated several times, I disagree with anything having to do with homosexuality because of my personal beliefs, morals, and values. You aren't going to change my opinion, so don't bother debating homosexuality with me. You will only grow annoyed and irritated. Though I disagree with homosexuality I believe that in the United States, all people are eligible to equal rights under the United States Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. With that being said, I disagree with homosexuality in any way, shape, or form; But I believe that you should have the right to marry who you please, regardless of gender, race, etc.

I think that the entire situation is complete bull shit. Obviously there is some truth to the story, but I think the entire situation is bull shit.

By Lawrence Hurley The court took no action on four other pending cases concerning gay marriage bans in Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky and Tennessee, but could act on those cases as soon as later this week.WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court, which is in the midst of deciding whether to take up the issue of gay marriage, on Monday declined to take an early look at a challenge to Louisiana’s state ban. http://news.yahoo.com/supreme-court-rejects-louisiana-gay-marriage-case-takes-144720151.html

I can see that you are not understanding my point. I'm too tired to argue any further right now, I'll respond again later this week with more arguments. Have a nice night.

No I am not suggesting that we commit an act of genocide. Again, that's retarded. How exactly does a world without religion suggest a communist state? Communism and religion have nothing to do with each other. With my provided example, it is assumed that you view the world at it's current state if it were without religion. If all religion vanished right this second, how would the world be? Not if there wasn't any religion to begin with.

Almost every aspect of terrorism has the involvement of religion. Imagine a world where all religion vanished, 100% gone permanently.

Nothing screams "retarded" like idiotic assumptions based on given circumstances. Edit: Religion. The United States doesn't negotiate with terrorists. I remember a politician saying something in the constitution says that we can't make deals with terrorists.

The only way to successfully remove terrorism would require Genocide of an entire people.

I'm Black so does that count? (lol...)

Before rushing to answer, think about it for a minute.

I'm baffled at the level of ignorance in your comment dude... I have no response, I'm just baffled.

Glad to see that not everyone takes everything absolutely 100% dead serious! :)

There's a time and a place for everything, and this just wasn't it.

Edit: A shame that some of you didn't see the humor in this. I and 220,000 others sure as hell did! :)

It really pisses me off when people think that Police just run up and down the street amok shooting people with no remorse or feeling or sense to it, as if they're just some sort of robot army. You think Police officers like killing someone? You think the Police enjoy shooting people and go to bed at night as if nothing happened? You think the Police can just move on and laugh at the past as if it's just some sort of joke? You're retarded if you do, and you're the reason that society is so fucked up. My father had to kill someone a few years ago, and its complete bull shit that anyone would think he was okay with it. To this day my father isn't the same man before that night. It's a shame that nobody cares about the officers that suffer the mental effects of killing someone stupid enough to resist law enforcement, a real shame.

I don't quite understand what you mean, can you elaborate further?

Anyone remember xapkpax?

About 3 on good nights.

Though I disagree with the definition of "respect" I understand your point. Thanks for the response.

But then how many of those 30M subs are consistently active on YouTube and watch every single one of his videos?

Lol I think some of the comments were deleted... I guess that signifies that we should end this discussion about Obama.

Yeah he was boarding the helicopter and didn't salute the Marine. He got back off the helicopter and shook the Marines hand and the Marine smiled.

Do you think terrorists may attempt at targeting the Queen of the UK? Does the Queen even have good security?