Olanov

For the lack of a better name... First short showcase of my peds in a video. I'll make a 2nd less longer one later. Download: '?do=embed' frameborder='0' data-embedContent>> Song(s) used: Health - Tears

I'm an agnostic. Whilst there's a lot of scientific evidence/theories about everything which I mostly believe, I'm not going to outright deny the possibility. It's a big universe.

Duck and cover.

Basically this. Also the Vietnam War.

Looks like a couple of crooks might have taken off with car parts.

That was so awkward and cringeworthy.

Wow, I'm truly in awe of your special skill to up and diagnose people to be racist by something irrelevant. Please, tell me your ways, supreme being. On topic though, that's horrible. Always a shame seeing people get burnt for doing the right thing.

Choices, choices... Guess I really don't have a favorite. I only have shows I like and shows I really don't like. Right now I'm watching the old Starsky & Hutch episodes, though. Love it. :)

Yeah, fair enough. It's an interestic topic, that's for sure.

Even if it's just 4% it could be avoided entirely should there be no capital punishment. Considering the nature of it it is pretty big. It is about taking a life after all. I agree with the latter, though. Had no idea how the rehab system is currently in the US, good to know. It would probably be a pretty good idea if they had more funding and was done correctly, though. In my opinion, that isn't the way to go. There has been cases in Finland where murderers have been properly rehabilitated and integrated back into the society, one popular case being the one of Lauri Johannson's. He commited two homicides and was convicted to life, for the Finnish justice system doesn't have capital punishment. He eventually admitted guilty and came to faith, I think he now works for the church. I can see it would be questionable if the current rehab system isn't as great but that's why you work for a change. Just because a person has committed something in the past shouldn't completely opt them out of a second shot. That's exactly the type of mentality that makes people want to fight for their freedom, potentionally harming others and themselves. It is possible to rehabilitate murderes given the right circumstances. Whether they themselves want to turn their life around, is the rehab system itself working properly and funded ect. Sure there's cases where people can't be rehabilitated but that's exactly why they're locked up. One point I forgot to bring up before was that the cost of a case involving capital punishment is also far more expensive than just imprisoment for life. I know I wouldn't want to pay for that.

I get that the punishment should be severe if the crime committed was very heinous, but for it to be so final I find it excessive and immoral. I understand that taking someone's life may be necessary in self defence when no longer there are other options avalible. However, when we're in the court room and this person is in custody, why should they be sentenced to death? Is he/she a threat to all the people in that court in those cuffs? What about in the facility, is he/she a threat to the general public being locked up? No. So why should they be put down? Because they're vicious animals? They're not. They're human beings. Just like you and me, although wired differently and with other physical differences. What makes it really wrong is the fact there has been numerous cases of innocent people on death row getting executed. If they had been serving only a long sentence and they'd be found out, the charges could've been possibly dismissed and those people freed, even awarded money for the damage done. The danger is still out there and rising. I'd like to think rehabilitation has proved pretty effective, (at least in Finland) and it could be applied in some cases in the States. I think it's every 12 years when a convict serving the life sentence is revaluated in regards of them being integrated back to the society. If they're still deemed potentionally too dangerous, they will keep serving the sentence. If not, they could get a second shot.

Good on them. This is how it should be.

It's also harsh letting a violent person roam the streets free so they could potentionally hurt somebody. It's also harsh to "justifiably" end someone's life after they are well secured and put away so they can't hurt nobody. It's just a sanctioned murder no matter how nicely you describe it, lol. Locking them up they got good time to think about what they've done and they can't hurt anybody outside of the facility.

No, that's perfectly fine. Spread the good word.

Agreed. I also loved mine very dearly. Here's the fleet.

Agreeing with Pavelow here. Never been supportive of the death penalty.

Anybody got a link to those cars?