Horvath

​That is what I thought, but then I thought the updates were finished. Thank you.

Where can I find my API key? I'm having trouble with that, as well as where to view crime stats. Thanks

I can play for about 3 hours before I start to have problems. I have much lower specs than you. 4GB RAM, 64 bit OS, AMD 1.4 GHz processor. I have modded vanilla cars, I use Wouter's Callouts. I run the strobes mod, and first person. That's it. I used to use headlight flaser, but I use LCPDFR's built in wig-wag, and the strobes set to flash indicators only. I also use a commandline to give me more memory and tweak the settings to allow my game to run better on my PC. The key is less mods. Anything you can do without, do without. The game is much more enjoyable when I can play as long as I want with no crashes or bugs.

The wedding does not occur in the place of business. If you ask a restaurant to cater your wedding, then they have to be present at said wedding. You cannot force a religious person to participate in an event which offends their beliefs, and it's pretty intolerant to expect them to. It isn't about business. It's about individual freedom. In case you hadn't noticed, all businesses are owned, and operated by, individuals. Individuals should not be subjected to performing tasks which offend their deeply help beliefs. If marriage is only about being legally bound, then go to the courthouse, get married, and be done with it. While you're at it, don't go to a religious shop owner and ask them to cater your reception. How do you not see how this protects people who want to practice religion? If someone asks you to do something that violates your religion, you can refuse to do that thing, and be protected against litigation! Where is it written that the state must separate itself from the church? That isn't even a law. That isn't even in the US Constitution. Also, for the record, the "separation of church and state" is meant to prevent the establishment of a state religion, like the Church of England. It is meant to keep the state out of religion, not to keep religion out of the state.

Personally, I have no issues with same sex marriage. The issue is that marriage is traditionally a religious event. Some religious people do not agree with the concept, and should not be forced to participate in a gay wedding, in any capacity. Does anyone know when and why RFRA was signed into law? Bill Clinton passed the federal RFRA law in 1993 to allow Native Americans the right to use peyote in religious ceremonies. Since 1993, around 30 states have passed a RFRA law at state level, because a court ruling determined that the federal government cannot tell states how to use their land, and the federal RFRA law didn't apply. Indiana's RFRA law is almost word for word, the same law Clinton passed in 1993. Why the uproar about Indiana? Over half the states have nearly identical laws!! I am headed to Walkerton this weekend. Gonna get me some Memories Pizza. I read the Yelp reviews. A lot of bad reviews from California... Yeah, like Walkerton is a huge tourist attraction... I would be confident in saying that 90% of their reviewers have never even been to Indiana. Look, bottom line is, this law protects people who want to practice their religion. It doesn't allow discrimination. If you're gay and a store refuses to provide service for gay wedding, you can still sue them, and you can still win. All RFRA does is provide a legal defense. Or, you can just go somewhere else that will do what you need done.

Right. Let's boycott Indiana for passing RFRA, which, by the way, about 30 states have, and not mention Iran, where being gay will get you killed. Companies like Apple bash my state for being anti-gay, while making business deals in Iran. Hypocrisy. Religion is Constitutionally protected. Same sex marriage is not. If my religion isn't allowed to intrude on their rights, then why is their "right" to marriage allowed to intrude on my right to adhere to my religion? Would you walk into a Jewish deli and ask for a ham and cheese sandwich? Would you be offended if they didn't serve you? You go in there knowing the outcome. That's exactly what the gay community is doing, and claiming they're being discriminated against. This law protects religious people from being discriminated against. You keep mentioning denial of service. You're looking at it through your narrow filter, and you refuse to see it for what it is. It doesn't give anyone a right to refuse service. What it does is allow business owners to choose not to participate in an activity which violates their beliefs. I do not agree with the way Pence handled things. He should have stood his ground, and explained the law. He is partly to blame for the misunderstandings. RFRA does not allow ANYONE to refuse service to ANYONE, for ANY reason. Period.

It isn't about denial of service. It has nothing to do with discrimination. It is about refusal to participate in an activity which violates their beliefs. Say I own a restaurant. A gay couple comes in every week for dinner. They love my food. I think they're great people. One day, they decide to get married. They come to me, and ask me to cater their wedding. I respectfully decline, because I will not participate in the union of a same sex couple, but hope they will continue eating at my restaurant. Also, why just Christians? In many Muslim countries, gays are killed simply for being gay.

Let us set the record straight: RFRA DOES NOT ALLOW DISCRIMINATION OF ANY TYPE All RFRA does is allow people of ANY faith to not be forced into participating in anything that violates their religion. Example: A restaurant CAN NOT deny service to homosexuals. EVER. The restaurant MAY, however, refuse to cater a same sex marriage, as that would be participating in an event which goes against their religion. RFRA would also protect a Jewish baker from baking a cake with the likeness of Adolf Hitler for a customer. (And it has. At least twice.) RFRA would protect a gay T Shirt printer from printing up shirts for the Westboro Baptist Church. RFRA would NOT cover a Christian shopkeeper from refusing to sell items to a homosexual. RFRA would cover a Jewish deli who refuses to serve ham and cheese sandwiches. RFRA is a defensive law, which provides a shield against litigation when you are sued. If the restaurant refuses to cater your gay wedding, YOU CAN STILL SUE, and they can still be charged, if the judge rules that RFRA does not apply. It isn't about discrimination. It doesn't allow discrimination. No one seems to understand what this bill actually does. No one should be forced to take part in something that violates their beliefs. A wedding is sacred to many Christians who believe it should be a man and woman. No one may claim that a Jewish or black wedding violates their religion. Well, Muslims are pretty anti-semetic... It isn't discrimination. The florist would have to sell flowers to anyone who comes into the shop, but they would not have to provide arrangements for a gay wedding.