Prophet

Gotcha, my bad, sorry for the ignorance on my part. Clearly I am in the wrong here.

All I am saying is, if I compare something's likeness to *Insert here* that is well known I would give credit to that *insert here* for me having based/compared that idea/likeness on *insert here*.

Right but the comparison is being made to "DROT" which is specifically known from "ELS". Doesn't matter though, I clearly was in the wrong for even saying anything in the first place and accept that. Right but it's specifically being compared to DROT.

I would assume the person Lt. Caine accredited in the ELS Documentation. Would make sense since the comparison being made is to ELS "DROT".

Guess it wouldn't; either way excited to see this in action. Wonder if credit will be given to the original creator of the idea. I honestly didn't see the difference until @Cj24 explained it just now and it clicked. Sorry for the ignorance lads; I should try and focus on debates on things I am more knowledgeable about.

I am a member of the G17 Team I don't troll.

Are you saying that the default GTA method does not include spinning rotators?

agreed.

Or simply say nothing as people would already assume that this is the default lighting system, no? Rather than confusing people with talk about DROT.

I'm not saying it's not ELS. I just don't know why he compares it to ELS when he could just say the pods spin. As is possible with default GTA.

Well then it is not DROT cause DROT is default lighting system for ELS.

DROT is based off of default lighting. So essentially you just made the pods spin, as they do default. That is why we are saying you essentially made default lighting.

Right. Lol.

Lt.Caine.

You left both UP and DOWN spotlights on btw.

A lot of the equipment looks as though they are for private use only. So I don't think so.

Very nice!

Not sure.

I only posted 4 pictures today... Not sure. Some Code5x guy spammed the gallery with some all blue cars haha