DivineHustle

Interesting that you bring up systemic racial bias when the people claiming racism are being run by the same race of people. Are you aware of the fact that Baltimore city has a majority black police department and most of the city politicians are black? Are you aware that the mayor of Baltimore city is a black female?

It's entertaining to me, I actually spit up my Sprite reading the first few sentences. May have to get a new keyboard here after that. The biggest thing that gets to me is when someone makes a completely wrong and invalid point, and then goes to bed that night thinking that they're right. That's why I respond to everyone, because if you're factually wrong then you need to know that you're wrong.

Let me tell you something, friend. I cannot take your argument seriously because you are using generalization. "They, they, they" is what you consistently start your (run on) sentence with—as though you've personally been acquainted with every single police officer in America. While it's clear that you have a difficult time understanding the concept of generalization, it's also apparent that you don't pay attention, so I'll repeat what I said: And explain to me what exactly an officer should do under the predicament that a taser is not an available option? Are you aware of the fact that some departments do not have tasers? You suggest using a taser if the individual isn't being actively threatening to the public, which is a complete dodge if my point. What if there is NO taser?

Oh my god, I loved that!

Especially since (to my knowledge) you have to pre-order the game, which is currently priced at $100. Edit: Ah my mistake, that was for the deluxe version. The regular version is priced at the normal $59 at Walmart.

I would assume not. When I visited Gamestop earlier today the back of the box said it would be a PS4 exclusive for the Beta, and release dates for other platforms are TBA.

About three days ago, Activision released a first-look trailer to the new highly anticipated Call of Duty: WWII video game. I've posted the official reveal trailer below and I've included a small poll to help organize your initial thoughts. How do you think this will compare with Battlefield 1, and their approach on WWI? According to Activision, Call of Duty: WWII has been in development since before Battlefield 1 was even initially announced. Personally, I'm pumped for this new Call of Duty. It's a nice change from the futuristic stuff we've been seeing for a while. I think back on Call of Duty: World at War and how amazing of a game that was and it really gets me pumped for this new Call of Duty. I'm also a bit bored of Battlefield 1. It was a fun game for a while but it's gotten to be very repetetive. The first Call of Duty game I ever played was Call of Duty 2 back in 2005. I never actually finished the game (mostly due to my ultra suckage at the time), but it was memorably enjoyable nonetheless. I eventually became a more "serious" Call of Duty player as I grew a bit older with the release Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. I enjoyed the modern theme and relatively engaging story that the game presented at the time. I completed the MW2 campaign several times, eagerly awaiting the sequel. Then Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 released in 2011. I was excited to wrap up the story and have a lot of my questions answered, but I didn't enjoy it as much as I enjoyed MW2. I never actually played MW1 and I may go back especially since it has been remastered. I pretty much dropped off from Call of Duty after that, I briefly got into the Black Ops games but I thought they were kinda trashy. https://www.callofduty.com/wwii Update: Nazi Zombies reveal trailer has been released!

Still no sort of rebuttal to your extensive comment on the media portraying the refugees as being a positive addition? Interesting.

Because we cannot put one foot into the door because when the door shuts our leg will get smashed. We either go all the way in or stay all the way out.

I agree. Pull out of Syria entirely and block any refugees from entering, not our problem.

A new personal favorite of mine:

And explain to me what exactly an officer should do under the predicament that a taser is not an available option? Are you aware of the fact that some departments do not have tasers?

I don't either but I'm called retarded when I say anything against them, lol.

I quoted the UN because people seem to think that they're the ultimate authority behind declaring what is true and what is not, man.

I'm not going to debate the philosophy of political affiliation with you man, lol. That'll be an endless discussion. They were alleged to have conducted a chemical weapons attack by the same UN that says they destroyed all of their chemical weapons. Which is also the same UN that said it is definitely a possibility that they may not have actually destroyed all of their nuclear weapons; and could still have the capabilities to create more. This UN doesn't seem like much of a reliable source, friend.

As far as I know, I'd say no. Of course, I'm not a mind reader so I cannot tell you exactly what the Infantrymen think, and not all of them feel the same way. But based on the Infantrymen that I have met, most of them seem willing and edged to fight terrorists, not necessarily Russia or North Korea. I haven't met every single Infantryman in the US Army, so I can't really make any generalization on it. I'm just basing it off of those I've spoken to. I also think we should go to war with Canada, because why the hell not.

If the civilians were in favor of continuing the war, then they had it coming to them. If the government refused to surrender but the people wanted to end the war, then it isn't their fault at all. Their government didn't abide by what they wanted for their own country. If the people wanted to continue fighting, then that's on them is what I'm trying to say. They wanted war, and they got the shit end of it. They shouldn't have attacked the US. It would depend on the circumstances. Do the American people want to surrender or do they want to continue fighting? We're fighting an organization that torture, rape, and murder innocent people. Not all, but a good portion of soldiers want their fair share of putting them to sleep. You think that soldiers share your perspective, well, you haven't met the US Army Infantry, lol. It's easy to make a sentimental judgment from a civilian perspective, but I'm telling you that a lot of these guys see it totally different lol, they are dying to see some action. Why else would someone enlist into the Military as an Infantrymen? Every Infantry guy I've ever spoken to has said the same thing, they want to fight the enemy, the people that target innocents.

According to the notably general accepted definition of common sense, it's relatively obvious that it was, in fact, the Syrian Regime that conducted the chemical weapons attacks. Not only do they possess the largest arsenal of these weapons in Syria, but they've conducted this attack before, according to the UN as evidenced by its sanctions. The beauty of being a Libertarian is that I can hold views of both sides without pledging direct allegiance to either. Generally speaking, members of either major political party in the United States refuse to make direct criticisms towards their candidate or elected politician because they'd prefer that individual over what the other side has to offer. That's why I ask if it's some sort of centrist organization because criticism of both Obama and Trump isn't something that I hear commonly among the left and the right, it's either one or the other. It's usually the "middle people" that make criticisms towards both. It was a far-fetched comparison as blatantly noted by my remarks throughout, but so long as you understood my point of concept. With every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. There are plenty of people that beg for war. Have you ever been in the military? I can't speak for the French military, but I can guarantee you that my fellow soldiers are begging to be let loose. They asked for it when they refused to surrender man. It's not like we just randomly ordered an atomic bomb to nearly destroy an entire nation. They refused to surrender, so we took the best course of action and saved millions of lives.

It was also very disrespectful for the Japanese to force American and Philipino troops to march over 60 miles. In my opinion, the Japanese deserved the cookie that they received. They were begging for a war, and they got exactly what they asked for. Syria is doing something remotely similar, and soon they'll face a (drastically) different but similar fate to the Japanese.

Are they some sort of centrist political organization?

Americans will do and say anything to defend their political affiliation. Since they're registered with a specific party they feel as though they're required to agree with and defend everything that the party does, it's nuts.

lmao 😂