Jump to content

Sentencing 13- and 14-Year-Old Children to Die in Prison Sad :(


Recommended Posts

First,let me say that I am completely against children in a normal prison. It is cruel in every way since no child should grow up in a prison, regardless of what he has done.

However, what this video doesn't show is what they did. Dominic Culpepper for example clubbed a girl and her mother to death. That's a horrible crime and it would be wrong to put such a person in a juvenile prison with juvenile thiefs and robbers. Unfortunately, these offender balance between two systems. You have the normal prisons, which are no place for them in my view. On the other hand you got the juvenile prisons but that's not an alternative either like I said. Building seperate prisons would be to costly I think.

How is the US even allowed to disregard the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child btw? For example, a child has a right to spare time and hobbies so how would that be guaranteed in a prison?

Here in Belgium, this is only possible for minors between 16-18 who are recidivists or for first time offenders with charges of murder/manslaughter. Also, the maximum punishment is 30 years. This, to me, seems like a fair system.

"Dura lex, sed lex"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First,let me say that I am completely against children in a normal prison. It is cruel in every way since no child should grow up in a prison, regardless of what he has done.

I strongly disagree, and think that teenagers with a reasonable degree of intelligence need to be prosecuted as adults in some cases. Despite US law saying 18 years old is a "legal" adult, some people are fully mentally and physically developed by that age. It should be a case by case basis.

Tips/Donate: u.gamecaster.com/unr3al
Twitch Channel: Twitch.tv/unr3al_twitch
YouTube Channel: YouTube.com/unr3algaming
Twitter: @unr3alofficial

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I strongly disagree, and think that teenagers with a reasonable degree of intelligence need to be prosecuted as adults in some cases. Despite US law saying 18 years old is a "legal" adult, some people are fully mentally and physically developed by that age. It should be a case by case basis.

I'll have to agree here, takes more manpower, pretty sure it's worth it though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, I partially agree with you. Like I said, our system allows it for 16-18 and I'm fine with this.

Regardless of the horrible crimes some of these teens committed, don't you think being sentenced to life at 14 years of age without chance of parole is cruel?

To me, a juvenile institution with prison security measures would seem more fitting. That way, you could focus on education, since minors still have compulsory school attendance, and specific activities for juveniles instead of putting them with adult serial killers and rapers where there is nothing for them to be learned anymore except more criminal behaviour. Like I said though, this would mean a serious extra budget of course.

Edited by kjel0112

"Dura lex, sed lex"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let's say a 16 year old kid killed a man, because he owed him money, or some crap people get killed for nowadays, and he was aware of what he was doing, would you still say it's too harsh?

If the person in question is mentally retarded, or something alike, I'd agree that they should be put in a institution instead, but manslaugters that were aware of what they were doing, and knew the consquences, I wouldn't hesitate to put the person in jail.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not that I'm pro or contra, it's just that minors have a lot of rights that are hard to accomplish in a prison. The fact is, in your example I would have no problem with it, seeing the facts are clear and 16 is a proper age. However, he would still have all the rights a child has by law. For example, right to education.

I just think it's harsh to sentence a 14 year old to life in prison without chance of parole. Some kids are just not educated or are born in extreme poverty and have no chances in life, other than a criminal career. And let's say for instance that a 14 year old and a 16 year old try to rob an old lady but the 16 year old one beats her to death with a club. Would that 14 year old have to be sentenced to manslaughter for being an accomplice?

Like unreal said, it's a case by case. Some teens really deserve to be sentenced to life. We had one recently here in belgium for killing a boy for his mp3 player.

However, in some cases, it's the lack of education and extreme poverty that is the number one reason for their crimes. I highly doubt that putting these youngsters, especially when they're only 14, in a normal prison would do good.

Don't get me wrong, I won't defend teenage criminals here. Far from it. When you've murdered someone, you have to be punished severely, whether you're 12 or 80. However, it's the way you punish them that should differ.

"Dura lex, sed lex"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First,let me say that I am completely against children in a normal prison. It is cruel in every way since no child should grow up in a prison, regardless of what he has done. However, what this video doesn't show is what they did. Dominic Culpepper for example clubbed a girl and her mother to death. That's a horrible crime and it would be wrong to put such a person in a juvenile prison with juvenile thiefs and robbers. Unfortunately, these offender balance between two systems. You have the normal prisons, which are no place for them in my view. On the other hand you got the juvenile prisons but that's not an alternative either like I said. Building seperate prisons would be to costly I think. How is the US even allowed to disregard the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child btw? For example, a child has a right to spare time and hobbies so how would that be guaranteed in a prison? Here in Belgium, this is only possible for minors between 16-18 who are recidivists or for first time offenders with charges of murder/manslaughter. Also, the maximum punishment is 30 years. This, to me, seems like a fair system.

The US has not ratified that convention; it has no legal power here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless of the moral issues of jail, I'm going to lay my thoughts out here:

There are some people who are ill-fit for society. People who cannot live amongst others peacefully. People you cannot reach, a "failure to communicate" (for Cool Hand Luke fans). Murderous sociopaths and sexual deviants who should not be walking the streets. Those sort of people cannot be picked out easily. They need extensive study and analysis by professionals. But most importantly they need an intelligent judge.

There are way too many cases of people who murder in cold blood or rape without feeling who get to walk the street again in a dozen years. I'm sick and tired of it. And as most police officers will tell you; it makes them sick too. All they can do is try to stay on top of them, and throw them back in jail even for jaywalking if they catch them doing it.

Tips/Donate: u.gamecaster.com/unr3al
Twitch Channel: Twitch.tv/unr3al_twitch
YouTube Channel: YouTube.com/unr3algaming
Twitter: @unr3alofficial

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@cp702: Ah, I thought they did. Well, after consulting Wikipedia: "Along with Somalia, the United States is one of only two countries in the world which have not ratified the Convention. President Obama has described the failure to ratify the Convention as 'embarrassing' and had promised to review this." Thanks for that, didn't know that. It explains why the US is indeed allowed to follow their own legislation. Maybe a lot of the UN child rights are provided in US legislation as well so there is no need for it to be ratified? I am no expert in US legislation though.

@Unr3al: couldn't agree more. Just like in the US, we also have the problem of overcrowded prisons. However, in Belgium this means that sentences below 3 years aren't even executed. Most of the time, these men remain free, pay a large fine or must wear an ankle monitor during house arrest. This is very frustrating for our officers, seeing most of their arrests won't even lead to a proper conviction and small criminals are back on the street in no time.

"Dura lex, sed lex"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why would you almost cry for someone who brutally murdered a kid with a bat? Most of the people in your examples deserve no sympathy. I'd say if the crime is first degree murder or worse, I'd want them to get life without parole regardless of age. If the person has some kind of serious mental illness though, they should be sent to a psyche institution.

Edited by Codz
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...