I guess the fact that you torture a man in GTA V is pretty innocent then.....or is it.

good point

I guess the fact that you torture a man in GTA V is pretty innocent then.....or is it.

its not as bad as seeing a little kid watching his parents get shot right in front of them

I guess the fact that you torture a man in GTA V is pretty innocent then.....or is it.

I agree with this. Both me and my father felt bad after that scene. It was unnecessary in my opinion. I know GTA is a graphic game, but that was a little over the top. 

I agree with this. Both me and my father felt bad after that scene. It was unnecessary in my opinion. I know GTA is a graphic game, but that was a little over the top. 

Even though I am emotionally detached from my parents "disciplining" me and my PTSD, I didn't like that part either.

its not as bad as seeing a little kid watching his parents get shot right in front of them

 

That is the entire basis of the Batman series of movies. They show that scene rather frequently in one way or another in a lot of the movies. So what is the difference between that and this? Was it necessary to show it in homefront, probably not. But it happens all the time on TV and in real life. It's just something that we don't want to think happens. Hell look at what has happened in the past couple of months. The Army vet that was shot by a highway patrol man had three kids in his car when he was shot and killed and the mother that went on the D.C. "Rampage" had her 1 year old in the back seat. While this is still a little different, it happens in real life probably more often than we think. Getting upset over this one instance in one game seems to me to be a little dramatic.

 

And no, I'm not just singling you out, just sharing my feelings on the matter as a whole.

I agree with this. Both me and my father felt bad after that scene. It was unnecessary in my opinion. I know GTA is a graphic game, but that was a little over the top.

it was awsome

That is the entire basis of the Batman series of movies. They show that scene rather frequently in one way or another in a lot of the movies. So what is the difference between that and this? Was it necessary to show it in homefront, probably not. But it happens all the time on TV and in real life. It's just something that we don't want to think happens. Hell look at what has happened in the past couple of months. The Army vet that was shot by a highway patrol man had three kids in his car when he was shot and killed and the mother that went on the D.C. "Rampage" had her 1 year old in the back seat. While this is still a little different, it happens in real life probably more often than we think. Getting upset over this one instance in one game seems to me to be a little dramatic.

 

And no, I'm not just singling you out, just sharing my feelings on the matter as a whole.

thats real life yes i was just saying it was harsh and some people react diffrent to this stuff

it was awsome

That's not the word I would use to describe it, no. I think it was over the top, even for a GTA game. 

So, to answer the OP, I guess as a community we agree with you.

is homefront to harsh

 

 

No, and this game is a good reality check for America, along with other western nations as this scenario is actually plausible which makes the game interesting.

No, and this game is a good reality check for America, along with other western nations as this scenario is actually plausible which makes the game interesting.

it is plausible but if anyone invaded the US they would have their butts handed to whoever invaded but there is a chance that the forces invading could break though some defenses and take some towns and do that

In the alternative future the game is set in, the Koreans make it all the way to Colorado, but can't push inland any further because the country is too big. One of the major reasons Germany wasn't able to defeat Russia in WWII. Even with 3 million men it's a lot of ground to cover against what would eventually be an even bigger army. Back on topic, in Homefront, they stopped at Colorado and took our oil reserves. An EMP bomb would render any of our advanced technology useless and the development of new technology would be extremely difficult. So all we'd be able to do is fight with basic infantry weapons and RPG's and maybe some vehicles. No air support. We'd have to have a few allied nations cross the Atlantic help us push the Koreans out, or if we could somehow persuade Russia or Japan to invade the western coast, while having Canada invade from the north to trap the Koreans in a pocket and eventually crush them from three sides. They'd have no choice but to either surrender or try to retreat to Mexico with no extraction method ready, provided that country remained neutral. If Mexico took our side, the Korean forces would be obliterated.

Edited October 9, 201312 yr by unr3al

homefront is harsh in the fact that it shows what martial law looks like...very creepy

homefront is harsh in the fact that it shows what martial law looks like...very creepy

agreed