Aguilar

I'm grateful for everything the people involved with LSPDFR/LCPDFR have done, really. It may seem trivial for some, but I reckon a good portion of people around here understand what it means to have a platform which enables you to roleplay as a police officer. That hasn't been accomplished since the Police Quest series and there's (PROBABLY, I don't know jackshit about programming/coding) a good reason for it - being that it's so complicated. Even with my limited knowledge on programming, I can tell how much blood and sweat goes into developing something like LSPDFR and troubleshooting all the little intricate issues that arise during the process. Knowing that people with LSPDFR aren't guys that are employed by someone, but rather enthusiasts (like us) that are willing to share their work, free of charge (!), makes me incredibly thankful. o7

the officer was already shot at, though. how much longer is the police supposed to really wait and play it safe if someone stands within arms reach and shoots? it's not going to get better from there on out and that's just not how it works, the threat hasn't immediately seized just because gunfire has momentarily paused (for whatever reasons) and giving someone who's that reckless a chance to further barricade themselves or take more shots, idk, it's like contributing to an escalation. in any case i do think that people are too quick to pass harsh judgement on these type of split second decisions. not to say i don't respect other opinions, but this is a discussion after all.

i already mentioned that there's a major difference between a "real" gas gun and gas powered bb guns. my opinion would perhaps slightly change if it were a bb gun, but as far as i'm concerned that wasn't the case here, so not much of a point in discussing that further. you'll have a hard time trying to find an officer that's going to attempt opening a door while someone's literally stood on the other side, shooting. withdraw and call for backup? fair enough. said that'd be an option as well, but i put no blame on an officer for returning fire when he's being shot at. it's extremely unfortunate that someone innocent got injured, but it's the suspect that put himself and the people around him in jeopardy here when he decided to recklessly use a lifelike (and at close range dangerous) weapon. finally, the officer didn't think he was threathened. he was being shot at, with a real weapon. gas pistols are less than lethal weapons, less than lethal far from guaranteed depending on the range they're utilized at.

the door was briefly opened to a gap and someone fired what looked to be and sounded like a real gun at a police officer within arms reach. i think it's pretty plausible to assume that the officer knew what was behind the door when it popped open and gunfire went off in his face, even if the door was closed afterwards. going by your logic a guy could literally shoot at an officer from behind a corner and the officer shouldn't be allowed to return fire, as he doesn't know every detail of what's going on behind the corner. using firearms is always risky business and potentially dangerous to innocent bystanders, but it's not like there's much room for diplomacy or intricate investigation once the guns come out and the bullets start whizzing past you. with that said, you're not likely going to count your shots when you're trading shots with somebody, nevermind at point blank range. popping off 1 round in a gunfight and hoping for the best is incredibly dangerous. shooting at someone 5 times might sound exaggerated to the general public, but i'd argue that mostly boils down to people not being familar with police tactics and taking what can be seen in movies for granted.

(disregard the commentary and just fast forward to the firing of the pistol) the video above shows a gas pistol in action, assuming OP wasn't referring to a gas operated bb pistol, this is what it sounds like if you're shot at with a weapon of that sort, implying the weapon didn't have a red tip either, which is fair to assume considering it happened in germany, the gun probably looked like the real deal too. now i'm not going to argue that identifying yourself as a police officer could've prevented an escalation, though i'm not entirely sure that it didn't happen in the first place and simply wasn't mentioned by OP(?). in any case, it would have been a terrible decision for the officer to try and open the door while he's confronted with an (apparent) madman shooting at him. could argue that it would have been safer to withdraw and call for backup or a tactical team, but self defence was definitely warranted at that point.

people have different preferences, and turks will always jump on a chance to mod their game to where their flag's plastered everywhere.

YEEEEEEEEEEES

ich vermute das die meisten mittlerweile auf den internationalen zug aufgesprungen sind und sich angewöhnt/gelernt haben englisch zu sprechen, dann ist man auch nich mehr so eingeschränkt in seiner auswahl. besser ist das. zum anderen ist das auch einfach wesentlich authentischer im hinblick auf american law enforcement, gerade wenn man an rp communities denkt, von denen dann auch eigtl so sachen wie realitätsgetreue radio codes und police lingo erwartet werden. aber ich kann mir auch gut vorstellen das da einige interessenten auftauchen werden, sobald lspdfr online auch wirklich online läuft.

das hat doch nichts mit schuld zu tun, ich spreche von fakten und du von vermutungen. Ragehook funktioniert nicht online, weil der Ragehook dev das nicht möchte. nicht etwa weil Rockstar es gebacken bekommen hat mods online unbrauchbar zu machen. wenn ihr darauf spekuliert das Rockstar dedicated server für modder zu verfügung stellt, könnt ihr im übrigen lange warten.

sag ma, geht's noch bei dir hr. schlau? hast genau dasselbe gesagt wie ich, halt nur mit dem verweis das der Ragehook dev das program online nutzbar machen würde sobald Rockstar dedicated server zu verfügung stellt. du räumst doch selbst ein das Ragehook online laufen könnte, ähnlich wie die ganzen anderen mods die über andere porgramme injiziert werden, wenn der gute herr es denn so wollte. wenn er das aber nicht will, ist das unäbhangig von seinem beweggrund sein gutes recht, ändert aber herzlich wenig daran das Rockstar's modding barrieren relativ vernachlässigbar sind.

hat null mit lspdfr oder rockstar restrictions zu tun, es sollte mittlerweile für jeden offensichtlich sein das mods generell problemlos online laufen - ob die nun erlaubt sind oder nicht es ne andere geschichte. hängt momentan alles vom Ragehook dev ab, der hat das ganze nämlich so eingefädelt das es nicht online läuft und somit eben auch nichts was von Ragehook eingebunden wird. sprich lspdfr wird erst online spielbar sein wenn der Ragehook dev seine einstellung ändert.

doesn't sound like your fps lag has anything to do with lspdfr. moving at greater speeds is more taxing on your rig, because it has to load objects faster and if you're computer can't handle it you'll get fps lag or the typical stutters caused by the game trying to load the objects in your vicinity. this isn't a gta v specific topic btw, applies just about to every game - you'll notice that you generally get better fps by not moving your avatar and/or camera and just looking steady towards 1 direction, better yet directly up at the sky or directly at the ground. gta v itself is very stable and the few, rare crashes caused by lspdfr tend to not end the game session, but instead just give you an error prompt. hardly warrants the label "massive stability problem", considering you can immediately reload your mods with the ragehook console.

versteh ich nich was den reiz am cheaten ausmacht. das einzige objective in diesem spiel is es geld zu scheffeln, wenn man denn alles geld der welt mit nem finger schnippen bekommt wo bleibt dann die motivation. i'm übrigen, wer, wie eine private session hosted is völlig latte, gerade weil public und "private" sessions die selben assets verwalten und nur fremde spieler ausschließen. der cheater wird gebanned, die jenigen die vom cheater profitieren bleiben in der regel unbehelligt da es oftmals der fall is das es nich unbedingt mit einwilligung geschehen ist. sprich script-kiddie wirft zig geldsäcke auf einen player um ihn gebanned zu kriegen. das geld, oder damit gekaufte assets, werden aber später wieder abgezogen. vllt hast du auch glück und wirst ewig lange keine konsequenzen sehen, aber das risiko liegt bei dir, nochmal; unabhängig davon was für eine art spiel session das ist und wer sie hosted.

gta iv wasn't THAT bad in the end, granted it wasn't well optimized. but i mean, i really didn't crash at all even during lengthier sessions if i just played it like it's supposed to be played - it only starting becoming a really messy situation once i threw mods in the mix.

great suggestion, i'm sure this wasn't on their to-do list until now.