So I got really bored this past hour and went into my county purchasing records and found out we are purchasing a second batch of FPIs, all seem to be unmarked, and our first batch of FPIUs, all unmarked. The second part confuses me because our county currently uses Late-1990s and Mid-2000s Suburbans and Late-1990s jeep Cherokees as our SUV vehicle. None that I know of are unmarked. Our fleet consists of 90% Crown Victorias and the rest are Suburbans and Cherokees.We bought 50 FPIs to replace our very old Crown Vic Fleet in 2013. And I dont believe we have purchased any new FPIs in the last 2 years. I know we dont currently have any FPIUs in service. Our county usually shows our new vehicles off when they get them. But wouldnt it make more sense to replace the Suburbans and the Cherokess first with marked FPIUs instead of servicing unmarked FPIUs in without replacing something. Most of our Suburbans and Cherokees are K9s, Maritime, SRO units. At least from what ive seen from living here since i was born. It just dosnt make sense to me not replacing the marked units first since they are aging. I know most of our unmarked CVPIs are 1999 and 2000 model years. But they arnt Patrol Cars so they dont see 24/7 usage. I dont know if I agree with servicing unmarked FPIUs first without replacing our aging suvs. But i can get on bored with replacing our old unmarked CVPIs. Tell me what yall think. And if youd like me to link the pdfs i will.