RDWAIFU

Personally I see no problem using text where there is no audio available, it was done in LCPDFR! If at a traffic stop you asked for a licence but he didn't have it, there was no audio for that, something like "Sorry officer, I forgot it at home!" Would appear over his head, and when on the street and asking for ID, similar might happen. Or on a drunk call, pedestrians might insult the drunk by use of those words over their head. And there's no reason not to use text for the radio ID call-ins, it was done in LCPDFR too, the radio when calling backup would be audio and text while ID only used text

Personally I see no problem using text where there is no audio available, it was done in LCPDFR! If at a traffic stop you asked for a licence but he didn't have it, there was no audio for that, something like "Sorry officer, I forgot it at home!" Would appear over his head, and when on the street and asking for ID, similar might happen. Or on a drunk call, pedestrians might insult the drunk by use of those words over their head. And there's no reason not to use text for the radio ID call-ins, it was done in LCPDFR too, the radio when calling backup would be audio and text while ID only used text

Personally I see no problem using text where there is no audio available, it was done in LCPDFR! If at a traffic stop you asked for a licence but he didn't have it, there was no audio for that, something like "Sorry officer, I forgot it at home!" Would appear over his head, and when on the street and asking for ID, similar might happen. Or on a drunk call, pedestrians might insult the drunk by use of those words over their head. And there's no reason not to use text for the radio ID call-ins, it was done in LCPDFR too, the radio when calling backup would be audio and text while ID only used text

Personally I see no problem using text where there is no audio available, it was done in LCPDFR! If at a traffic stop you asked for a licence but he didn't have it, there was no audio for that, something like "Sorry officer, I forgot it at home!" Would appear over his head, and when on the street and asking for ID, similar might happen. Or on a drunk call, pedestrians might insult the drunk by use of those words over their head. And there's no reason not to use text for the radio ID call-ins, it was done in LCPDFR too, the radio when calling backup would be audio and text while ID only used text

:D

No, police sending riot cops to what is a peaceful protest at the time is not generalisation, it's being proactive and taking precautions. Which is beneficial in the long run. It makes sense that you send more capable forces to deal with what has turned violent most of the time. If taking precautions to safety and security and being proactive is generalisation, so be it. It's worth generalising these people if it saves business's, property and potentially lives

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think any of the "Support Officer Darren Wilson" protests became city-wide riots, or actually had any problems at all. The people who started attacking cops and burning cars and buildings were people from the crowds of "peaceful protestors"
Yes, yes it is fair. If I punch a cop cause I'm angry my sister died it's still a crime, and its logical for me not to punch him. Just because these idiots rioting are angry doesn't justify unleashing on anything. It's better they unleash on riot cops than patrol cops, because riot cops are there for dealing with such idiots and are equipped to do so

I think you need to realise that while it is your right to go out and protest, you cannot simply gather a large group and March down the freeway or into any area. Appropriate authorities must be notified of the protest, otherwise it will be deemed an illegal gathering and dispersed with force if necessary. It's been said already, everyone's all up about their rights, but few actually know them

Think about it like this. A nice event is going on, maybe a famous person visiting somewhere. Place gets shot at/bombed and people die, there was low security at the event. These protests are similar, they started peacefully then became riots, smashing cop cars and property, attacking cops. So the next time this event takes place, this theoretical famous visit, there is higher security, preventing a bombing or shooting or attack. Due to tight security it either doesn't happen again or its contained when it happens. Now, protests have had normal police response, and ended violent and couldn't be contained easily. Since this is a common problem police send riot police to contain the now very likely threat of a dangerous riot. It's completely justifiable and has led to successful containment of riots. Those who say that sending riot police sparked riots are talking bullshit, because they rioted against less armoured cops long before they started sending riot officers

​The public do not control what they do, and should not. Police are given training specifically so they know what to do and when to do it. By giving the civilians the power to dictate what every officer does as his duty is insane, as policing can not be controlled properly by people who know nothing about it. The education system can't be run by those who know nothing about it, neither can the economy, and so on. The police should not be thrown into extra risk by unintelligent civilians who know nothing about law enforcement. Police are professionals in what they do, they go to academy to learn about how to be a cop, and walk the streets endangering their lives for people they don't know. Civilians on the other hand, have no police training or education, and can't be relied to select what tactics police use simply because they don't agree. Don't like the tactics? Boohoo, they're effective and they save lives, and anybody who would think that endangering the lives of officers further is an absolutely disrespectful fool. Approximately one police officer dies every 58 hours according to statistics from the Officer Down Memorial page. This does not need to become worse because some stupid civilian who knows nothing about law enforcement decides he doesn't like the tactics used by law enforcement. He is not the one risking his life, he is not the one under pressure, he is not being shot at, he is not making split second decisions and he is not the one protecting and serving others. Let the professionals run the police. Just because it's a democracy does not mean the general civilian population should have the ability to change any little thing about anything, it's outrageous to think they should be allowed freely increase the risk of death for officers, and then not have to take responsibility when a dedicated and devoted officer of the law dies at the hand of a criminal in possession of a high quality firearm who doesn't give a shit who he shoots. The police are trained in tactics and they make new, more effective tactics all the time and put them into practice. Civilians who know nothing about being in a shootout should not be given the ability to make up tactics when they know nothing about it.

​I think you miss my point. Officers should not be told what tactics to use by a general public who neither cares for the officers lives, nor knows jack shit about how police tactics work or even law enforcement. Civilians who are shot or arrested are generally criminals, and although they didn't sign up for it, they choose to live in the country or state with such laws that they broke. If they don't like the laws, they can fuck off, but if they continue to reside in said area, they must abide by them, they simply choose to break the law, and the police, by law, must stop this. In no way should both criminals and the general uneducated and uncaring public be allowed decide what the POLICE do, because they know nothing about how law enforcement works, and they don't care about risk to officers. I understand officers who join the police accepted a risk, and so do they, but I find it heavily disgusting and disrespectful that people think the risk they take to protect and serve US should be increased because some fuckers who know nothing about how law enforcement or tactics work decide they don't like the tactics. It's disgusting.

​I'm sorry, but are you really suggesting police must obey the every whim of the civilians? That police should knowingly change tactics, risking the death of police officers? Simply because civilians don't like their tactics? Forgive me, but I do not believe civilians are trained or have generally experienced tactical, split second decisions police officers must make to save the lives of themselves, fellow officers and civilians. The civilians are not law enforcement experts and can not be allowed tell police what tactics they can and cant use. Yes, the tactics should consider the safety of civilians, but they shouldn't disregard the safety of officers at the expense of how happy civilians are with their work. Yes, police officers signed up and know they take risks, but no matter what tactics they use they still risk everything. By allowing untrained, inexperienced and uneducated civilians in terms of tactics and law enforcement to decide what tactics the cops should use, you are effectively sending officers to their death, the officers who have to follow the tactics that the general civilian population HAPPY with, will end up dying, and very little civilians who made sure the tactics are changed will give a shit. You can't trust the running of law enforcement in the hands of untrained and uneducated civilians in terms of law enforcement. Police Officers are people. Why would you let people change their tactics just because they aren't happy with them, and knowingly send officers to their deaths. Mothers, Fathers, brothers, sisters, sons and daughters. They are people and should not be treated with such disrespect that untrained and uneducated civilians decide what tactics to use. The police are the ones throwing themselves in the line of fire for the civilians. The civilians do not make the risky split-second decisions that cops made. I find it utterly disgraceful that people think a police officer should be subject to such ignorance and have their lives put in danger by the tactics civilians chose.

​Scripting instead of coding.

Yes, it would be great if someone could CODE a script to load the Police Station interior from GTA Online that we can access in singleplayer, like the jail cells, briefing room, hallways, locker room and captains office. The open all interiors mod opened the doors to the armoury, the hallways and briefing room (But they aren't loaded like in Online) and the captains office. If we could find a way to load that interior it would be great. There's also textures from the GTA Online character selection screen which could be useful in something

It depends who you Taze. If you Taze a cop, security guard they won't die, they get back up, if you Taze a spawned ped who runs from you like the muggers in the ATM mugging random events, they don't die either. But if you Taze an average pedestrian, even if they start attacking you, they fall to the ground, curl up in the fetal position and die. I believe a mod exists that fixes this 

It depends who you Taze. If you Taze a cop, security guard they won't die, they get back up, if you Taze a spawned ped who runs from you like the muggers in the ATM mugging random events, they don't die either. But if you Taze an average pedestrian, even if they start attacking you, they fall to the ground, curl up in the fetal position and die. I believe a mod exists that fixes this 

It's a pity there is no proper SAHP patrol car in the game like the CHP CVPI
Hopefully mods can provide

Hey guys.  Got started on making a mod... didn't really know what I was making at first but just wanted to learn the new APIs... 
The result is something I figured I would share, this was about after 5 hours of coding and so forth - I'm still trying to get used to the RageHook in itself.  Either way, enjoy the sneak-peak of LS PARAMEDIC.  I'll be trying to keep this thread updated, but feel free to track it on YouTube.
 
 

The second and final trailer for the highly anticipated sequel to LCPDFR has just been released, showcasing a number of features which have made it into the first public release of LSPDFR, including traffic stops, arrests, pursuits and of course, drinking coffee!  
Although feedback to the debut trailer for LSPDFR was, for the most part, quite overwhelmingly positive, we did understand the disappointment shown by some at the perceived lack of features.  Of course, our main priority then was to break our silence on LSPDFR and treat everyone to a very early preview.  Now, with many tireless days and nights of development under our belts, we present a more in-depth taste of things to come.
Stay tuned for more updates on LSPDFR as development comes to an end and the first public release fast approaches.
 
There's also an alternative Vimeo version available for anyone having issues with YouTube: https://vimeo.com/129257919

AYY
LMAO
 

>inb4 Ayy lmao

>inb4 Ayy lmao

>inb4 Ayy lmao

It's a behind the scenes video of how we staged everything with the trainer. Happy late April Fools!

Called it you spuds 
I am god
physcic reading cost two fiddy a pop