Chiheb Bacha

This link should work https://discord.gg/VMvvuFxArY and tens of people join everyday using it. Just make sure you self-assign a role in #roles when joining so that you can access all the channels.

@Will I thought It would be appropriate to create an account and join the conversation. I have successfully updated SSLA since the 26th of April, and posted the updated ASI on my discord (the link already pinned to this conversation) in #test-builds for people to test. So far, over 1100 people have done that and no issues were reported. I have already forked the repository and pushed the changes, but the binary is currently only in my discord, as I still need to get things sorted out for a public release. Another thing that delays any public release is the licensing issue you brought up. Although I am certain cpast is referring to the redistribution of the binary and not any work based on the source code, It would of course be better to get his approval first. From what I can see, cpast just wanted to get the mod out there and didn't care too much about licensing and stuff, evidenced by the usage of code from EasyHook in his HookingLib without any licensing. But I understand you as Management would care more about that. What I could do, Is rewrite the whole script by "learning" from what cpast has written, and that would make of it an original script (the patch can't be deemed original, given that it's constrained by the disassembly of the game. For example what I had to do to update it made the part I changed completely different from what cpast has done, although the idea remains the same), then of course give attribution to cpast, given that he made the original script through research and all. But if, even then, you're still uncomfortable with hosting, you could still link to my discord, and I'll keep it there (It's currently in #test-builds as you know, but once I add pre-3788 compatibility back, and eventually Enhanced support, I'll move it to another channel). I also plan on porting SSLA to Enhanced, as many people asked for it, which I don't think cpast has any plans for. That being said, If I can get cpast's approval to simply continue using his code as-is and build on top of it, then great, saves me time. If not, then I'll rewrite it as I said. Have a great day :)