wmai20

Input from our Community Box:

It appears Google and Motorola have stepped in to make this idea actually happen. Codenamed "Ara ", Motorola claims they have been working on a concept very similar to Phonebloks for over a year now. I'm actually interested in seeing what Google (Motorola's owned by Google) can bring to the table. http://www.ibtimes.com/motorola-project-ara-can-google-make-phoneblok-style-smartphones-possible-1445730 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skXwTxo0Bo0

The perspective of this particular image is deceiving. It's bigger than what is shown here. Here's another picture from a higher angle. Edit: Formatting

Agreed. However, it's nice that they're finally switching out the Tomar 930l's with Tomar Blades/Whelen Liberty's! Same with the county cruisers.

Jesus. It's such a small world out there. - Fairfax City, VA

LOL.

Spamming your topic across the forums won't help you in any way. You're just making more work for the moderators. Now to your question. If you do not have a backup of a fresh-install of the game, I suggest you uninstall it from steam. Before you re-install it, make sure any leftover folders of the game are deleted from the steam directory in order to prevent further problems. There is no charge for installing, reinstalling, or uninstalling a game on steam.

The PC gaming community's not going anywhere, anytime soon. I don't think a lot of people are willing to give up the modding capabilities, higher visual settings, settings tweaking, and overall freedom the PC copies of most games offer. I'm not in anyway trying to "diss" consoles, or their users, but I'm sure the reasons stated prevously are enough to keep the PC community well populated and thriving.

They're not saying anything wrong. The staff, along with many others are stating that any "rumor" should be considered false or misunderstood until Rockstar officially confirms it via Twitter, their website, ect. This is correct. As Harper said, all GTA titles have been released on the Pc in the past, so I don't see why they wouldn't do with for V. Just be patient.

Haha. :D

We occationally join the server for a little "shit n' giggles" chat, or just to hang out/play games. It's just that time is precious and a lot of us have other things to do and are very busy.

...penguin<3 ...hi ^. Oh I mean...

You need to download an ASI Loader such as dsound or xliveless. You also need Scripthook.dll which comes with most mods.

Samsung Galaxy S3

Happy fourth.

In the video you can clearly see he's been lingering around the area for a while now. He's holding a phone or camera, recording the officers on scene while holding his dog, and blasting music from his car. He apparently was planning to file a lawsuit against that department for some reason. I guess he was warned some time before the incident and continued to ignore the officers' warnings. If someone's refusing to leave a scene where they've been asked to leave, they can be arrested for obstruction according to California Penal Code.

The man was blasting loud and distracting music while getting a little too close to the officers who were making an arrest. There's a reason why he was charged with Interference of a police officer. California Penal Code Section 148 A: "Every person who willfully resists, delays, or obstructs any public officer, peace officer, or any emergency medical technician as defined in Division 2.5 of the Heath and Safety Code, in the discharge or attempt discharge any duty of his or her office or employment, when no other punishment is prescribed, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1000), or by imprisonment in a county jail not to exceed one year, or by both that fine and imprisonment. The arrest was justified as he indeed, delay and obstruct a public/peace officer. Refering to the latter information I'm assuming that the "arrest" was justified. Before his arrest he came up to the officers and asked "Why there were no black officers on scene?". That statement was unneeded and uncalled for. He's just a man nitpicking every little detail of what he thinks is "wrong" about the department just to support lawsuit he planned against the Hawthorne Police Department. He was clearly asking to get arrested with his actions and music, and he got it. To all the users on this topic posting how the dog was "just a adorable, cute, loving, dog", it was an 80 pound ROTTWEILER. These dogs are VERY aggressive when their master is attacked, and can cause SERIOUS damage. A tazer would simply aggravate even more and possible endanger the officers even further. A dog with 80 pounds of PURE MUSCLE can very well withstand a tazer, assuming the ONE shot actually makes contact. This is not LCPDFR, you can't reload a tazer in one second. Both prongs of the actual projectile have to make contact with the skin of your target. Considering these circumstances, using a tazer in this instance could be risky. As previously stated in my previous post, the dog would have died anyways if he had been tazed or shot. The officer could have: 1. Shot the dog and saving the county money, or 2. Tazing the dog, transfer/housing/feeding it at an animal control facility, and then have a court order for it to be put down for rabies testing. Either way, the dog was going to die. For what it's worth, the dog owner was stupid for conducting his actions, he knowingly knew the consequences. Should have left the dog at home. http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/148.html http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/01/police-shoot-dog_n_3530990.html http://www.bakersfieldnow.com/news/local/Caught-on-video-Police-shoot-kill-dog-during-arrest-214018171.html http://newsone.com/2625509/leon-rosby-california-police-shoot-dog/ http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/graphic-video-police-shoot-dog-article-1.1387861