Reputation Activity
-
LtSnoDawg69 got a reaction from Charlie S40 in How will lspdfr will response to "New generation Police Module" ?The best we can do is wait and see by not getting our hopes up.
-
LtSnoDawg69 reacted to Will in Indeed, Virus or not? Curiosity of all playersI'm not understanding what about Cyan's responses are not good enough? It seems like you want the entire source code of LSPDFR released to be satisfied, which simply isn't going to happen, at least not for a long while. And even then what would you hope to gain? You would need an in depth knowledge of programming to understand what any of the code does and no one has the time to sit here explaining every line to you.
The mod has over 18 million downloads, don't you think it would have been found out if it did anything malicious?
-
It is the right of every computer user to obtain information before using a program. My questions, posted here, have the strong intention of extracting information from you to inform ALL users, from the most experienced to the most novice.
If you happened to feel offended by anything, it is unnecessary, as my intentions are good and collaborative. I am not doubting your work but merely requesting simple information, with no risk involved. It is important that doubts are answered so that we can learn and gain knowledge. This is how we all grow and develop.
Se você continuar a não explicar em termos simples, podemos terminar aqui. Agradecerei educadamente, mas você deixará um apoiador insatisfeito.
-
LtSnoDawg69 reacted to Cyan in Indeed, Virus or not? Curiosity of all playersI gave you the answer. If there's something specific you need clarification on, let me know.
The fact you are asking for this shows your misunderstanding of the security landscape. AV software basically uses heuristics with a white list model. If you pay a stupid amount for a code signing certificate, your software is basically immune from AV checks. We don't pay for a code signing certificate. I've told you why we trigger heuristics, LSPDFR and RPH do things which are considered malicious (changing another process).
LSPDFR has only some files inside that can trigger AV detections (DLL, EXE). I'm not going to tell you what every single one of them does, but a great partition of them are open source, so you can research them yourselves. LSPDFR and some of its dependencies are closed source software, like the Windows operating system you run and most of your software, so you have to have some trust, just like you do in other closed source software, that it isn't malicious.
On hybrid-analysis; The malicious detection is garbage by the way, as you'd be able to note with a very cursory look: it's actually highlighting the setup loading our configuration tool.
As I said, if you have a specific concern that isn't me trying to make you understand how software or security works in general, I'm happy to entertain it. If you are wanting me to explain every file inside the download, it isn't going to happen as it's a waste of time. If you have a specific concern about something that LSPDFR or RPH does, that isn't just copy pasted from something like hybrid-analysis, please do let me know, otherwise this will be my last reply on the matter.
-
I'm sharing with you the results from the Hybrid Scan. Maybe it's a false positive. Why are so many resources flagged this way?
[Hybrid Analysis Results](http://hybrid-analysis.com/sample/752fca1b5dd26a20a568a1d1ef8124214fea91178361d2cef1bb2dff938cbc90/67bb6c654b5dd79b010269b7)
-
Hello Ciano,
Thank you once again for your response. I'll try to be as direct as possible to avoid any confusion.
Currently, in the technological landscape, there are various problems with hacker attacks occurring, which reinforces the need for care with the protection of each operating system. A simple breach can generate a complete list of vulnerabilities, even if hidden.
To provide greater security and understanding to the users of LSPDFR, it would be beneficial to offer a detailed explanation of each file: how it works, what programming languages are used, possible false positives due to its behavior, and how to resolve any issues that arise. We don't want just the same old answers, but rather clear and transparent responses, similar to a medication leaflet.
My goal is to help, repeat, I am an enthusiast of this mod and appreciate it a lot, as well as respect the work of each team member. Do you understand now?
-
LtSnoDawg69 reacted to Cyan in Indeed, Virus or not? Curiosity of all playersWhat in particular are you finding difficult or confusing with my answer? LSPDFR/RPH's behaviour can look malicious to anti-virus software, hooking and other behaviors are techniques that are also used by malicious software. We need to hook the game as there is not a developer API for it.
Is there a way I can make this easier to understand for your needs?
My honest encouragement is if you don't trust us - simply don't use it.
-
Colleague, I am a fan of this LSPDFR mod. I posted this publication and tried to contact you via DM, but your responses did not address my questions.
The LSPDFR mod is globally recognized and used by players around the world. Due to the history with these possible false positives verified by the community, a more direct and informative explanation is ideal. What I want is just information, not robotic answers.
I kindly and respectfully request that you provide more enlightening details, please.
● To ensure a better understanding of the seriousness of the issue, I kindly request that you conduct your own test with the .exe file on the following site: [Hybrid Analysis] (https://hybrid-analysis.com/).
Thank you for the understanding of everyone who forms this beautiful team!
-
LtSnoDawg69 reacted to Cyan in Indeed, Virus or not? Curiosity of all playersHello. Thanks for your feedback. To provide clarity on this question, an answer is provided on the actual download page of the mod;
Some anti-virus software programs mark LSPDFR and/or RAGEPluginHook as a virus. This is known as a false-positive. LSPDFR and RAGEPluginHook make extensive use of memory hooking to achieve a lot of what they do, which can look malicious to anti-virus software. If your anti-virus marks LSPDFR/RPH as unsafe or you have odd issues running LSPDFR/RPH, you will either need to exclude LSPDFR and RPH's files (refer to your antivirus documentation for more details) or you will have to disable the anti-virus software.
Ultimately if you don't trust it, don't download it.
-
Dear LCPDFR community members,
I am new to this community and, like everyone else, a great admirer of this beautiful and fun MOD. However, I would like to share some observations regarding the current version of LSPDFR .exe, dated February 25. I conducted several tests using sandboxing tools such as VirusTotal, File Scan, and Hybrid Analysis, among others. All tests indicated that the LSPDFR .exe file was identified as potentially malicious.
I believe it is important to provide clear information on these issues to ensure user satisfaction. I value the dedicated work of the developers and hope we can clarify these detections.
I would like to request a more detailed and explained response from those responsible.
Thank you for your attention, and I hope you have positively understood my concerns and those of thousands of players worldwide who enjoy this gameplay.
-
LtSnoDawg69 got a reaction from harizon88 in How will lspdfr will response to "New generation Police Module" ?Also there is likely a strong chance that we may not have a PC release for GTA 6 for a few years after it's released on consoles.
-
My game works fine I'll put that at the front, however, it's personal preference that RAGE needs to show the updated build version. All my files are updated to the latest 3351 yet on startup of RAGE still shows build 3323. I have uninstalled/reinstalled LSPDFR which comes with RAGE twice to no avail. Why would it still be showing 3323 ANY HELP APPRECIATED!!!
-
LtSnoDawg69 got a reaction from KCSHIVAM in How will lspdfr will response to "New generation Police Module" ?The best we can do is wait and see by not getting our hopes up.
-
LtSnoDawg69 got a reaction from KCSHIVAM in How will lspdfr will response to "New generation Police Module" ?Also there is likely a strong chance that we may not have a PC release for GTA 6 for a few years after it's released on consoles.
-
LtSnoDawg69 reacted to Bear82 in Script HookYeah, I know that too, but it would definitely help if we could tell you that the external site isn't available at the moment / or that it's working again now. Otherwise, it seems like every second query is "why isn't it working" 🙂 Thanks for your support, it's a shame that the makers of GTA are currently releasing a lot of updates that are messing everything up.
-
This is actually something that was added to ScriptHookV. We have no idea why though. The fact that Alex's website is down other than the ScriptHookV page barely working, and the fact that this change was very random and very strange leads me to believe that his website might have been hijacked and someone uploaded this version to it. THIS IS JUST A THEORY THOUGH. It might be just the fact that it's now going to be like this. We'll find out eventually though.
-
LtSnoDawg69 reacted to officerfirst40min in GTA5 is just a crappy foundationGTA5 is just a crtappy foundation to base a whole game off! i mean it never works always freezes or elimantes you from just having to have fun.
-
LtSnoDawg69 reacted to Cyan in GTA V UPDATED TO VERSION 3323Hello,
Copyrighted material isn't permitted to be shared on LCPDFR.com without permission from the copyright holder, sorry. You'll have to wait for an update, or restore your own backup.
-
LtSnoDawg69 reacted to Sanders67 in GTA V UPDATED TO VERSION 3323Does this also work for steam? If so I can provide the files, I still didn't update mine so I probably still have the 3274 version.
-
LtSnoDawg69 reacted to am21game in GTA V UPDATED TO VERSION 3323Does anyone have the files to downgrade to the previous version (3274)?
Because I forgot to do the backup of those files
-
LtSnoDawg69 reacted to Vojtak42 in BattleyeThis isnt true at least for me🙃.
(At least when i dont have Battleye installed, I haven't tried it otherwise)
-
LtSnoDawg69 reacted to Etunimi in LSPDFR downloadI downloaded lspdfr setup, but its not in the winrar file. How i can have the setup in winrar file??
-
I have a legal gta v for Fivem but i also want to install a cracked version for Lspdfr.
Can I have two versions? a legal and a cracked one?
-
LtSnoDawg69 reacted to Eastsiderellie89 in Crashingits crashing due to lspdfr data rename lspdfr to lspdfr and going into lspdfr folder and scroll down to sync_ and delete it and relaunch the game so it can correct it
-
LtSnoDawg69 reacted to Cyan in lspdfr version 3274 virus??? lspdfr not starting and pc detetcing virusDid you read my message? It's a false positive, not a virus.