OFFICERJAKE8

First of all, police want to make their presence known so people will think twice about turning to violence. Second, Mike Brown is a scumbag. He attacked Darren Wilson. Now Wilson is receiving threats, his family members are getting threatsthreats, and his career is over just for doing his job. Mike Brown doesn't deserve a memorial in my opinion.

What city was this? What were they protesting about? Was the protest starting to get violent so the police showed up to control it? These are questions we must know before making a judgment.

You can NOT take away the second amendment. What does a no gun sign do? All it does is tell an armed criminal to come and rob and shoot me. All a gun law like that does is disarm good citizens. Criminal won't care about a gun law since they are going to break the law anyways. It makes it easier for criminals. Although I do not think there will ever be a government takeover, the right to bear arms protects the people from one.

This is why we need a conservative president. Someone like Ted Cruz or Rick Perry wouldn't mess around on situations like taking away our second amendment and would stop crime and terrorism before it blows out of proportion.

Wait a second, how do police deal with violent armed criminals if the police aren't armed themselves? It sounds like an oxymoron to me.

​So what is the other solution?

The bottom line is if a protest turns to a violent riot, force must be met with force. http://d.ibtimes.co.uk/en/full/1435846/baltimore-riots.jpg?w=736

​RDWAIFU is exactly right. I couldn't have said it better myself. The motto "to protect and serve" is not just a saying, it is police officer's way of life.