TheGrandMaster

I know this is an old topic but if you could consider doing an Oak Park, IL PD pack I would be grateful asf. It's a suburban department (west chicago), so it's vehicle array is not overwhelming diverse (typically they use 2018/2014 chargers and the 2018 FPIU, but they also [still] utilize the 2011 Crown vic, 2014 Tahoe, and recently the new 2020 FPIU.) Btw awesome job with the chicago pack, hope you plan on updating it in the future!

It's not a bug and is in fact a feature as it indicates that the plates are fake (which further indicates that the vehicle is most likely considered stolen).

I wasn't making an excuse, nor was I ever justifying the actions of that individual. Also, Right Wingers don't say terrorism is caused just by Islam, but that Islam has been the justification for numerous terrorist attacks in the past few years, and should I add that "Right Wingers" are not the only ones who "moralize" others about how Islam is bad, in fact there are many prominent figures who were/are Muslim and speak out about the major flaws with Islam that are acted upon in reality. There is no Irony, because no mass of Right Wingers are justifying the actions of this terrorist. Who's going to stop the terrorists from being inspired by ISIS/Islam and committing these terrorist attacks in the name of both? Who's going to stop them from traveling to Syria to join ISIS? I do support the idea of securing borders, but I can't say that I support Religious Segregation. I wasn't referring to terrorism in general, I was referring to major terrorist groups, organizations, and individuals who could be classified as potential terrorists. I understand that terrorism as a whole can't be stopped, but there are moves we can make in order to stop terrorist groups. Yes , it will. You just said yourself that Islam provides an "easier way" for potential terrorists to believe these atrocities are justified. I am also fascinated by how you can read the mind of others and know what they think because of your psychic powers and how you can simply determine that Power is the sole reason why they want to commit such atrocities and that Islam is merely a justification for such and used at their disposal for recruiting others., I suggest you make a career with your powers. There is more evidence to suggest that Islam is the driving force in their actions rather than their desperate moves to gain power. It is dishonest, because we've seen more terrorist attacks being committed in the name of Islam than terrorists committed in the name of Right Wing Ideology, and not just because of how they commit it, but how often in a period of time.

"Sadiq Khan has said he believes the threat of terror attacks are “part and parcel of living in a big city” and encouraged Londoners to be vigilant to combat dangers." http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/sadiq-khan-london-mayor-terrorism-attacks-part-and-parcel-major-cities-new-york-bombing-a7322846.html I should have said the threat of terror attacks, so you're right in correcting me.

Really? I thinks it's regressive enough to refuse to to the terrorist as a terrorist simply because of his religious affiliation and that it played a role in his/her motivation to commit such atrocities, but the media even refuses to refer to this terrorist in particular as a terrorist? Keep in mind, however, that the same thing happened with the terrorist in Nice when he drove the truck into a crowd of people. Other than that, people shouldn't be surprised that a "far right wing" terrorist would do such a thing, as unfortunate as this event is. The refusal for leaders to lead and respond to similar situations appropriately was eventually going to cause someone to do this. For goodness sake, Sadiq Khan refused to make any major move against terrorism and instead made policing the internet a priority over fighting terrorism (at least when discussing Police Allocation). He also said that terrorism is a part of life in a big city, something that no person in the right mind would ever be okay with. Last mention, if anything, the double standard is held by the regressive/progressive far left that refuse to talk about the rise in Islamic Terrorism and completely ignore the terrorists religious affiliation when it plays a role in the terrorist's motivation, but are quick to blame the 'Right Wingers' for any terrorist attack committed by someone who's either white or a right winger. Terrorism should be called out no matter who it is committed by, but we are seeing a certain ideology (Islam) be more influential to extremists than another (Christian/Right Wing). Simply measuring as both being equal threats is both dishonest and counter productive.