xGRAVEKILLERx

I thought I had thrown this up already but I guess not
 
 
http://youtu.be/YDKiELA_ELs
 

Right off the back you need to be louder.... People will turn away if all the hear is hey guys blah blah....
Also i can't tell if its just GTA or not but there's static.
Use this a constructive critasim. <--- I can't spell :

Mic boost in sound options or just turn down your game sound

DAMN...

but i have the disc
            but i have the disc 
                   but i have the disc
What?
 
And with your specs with that low ram it would be a sight to see Gta even start. 
Shoot for 4Gb of ram and it wold take about 15Gb on your hard drive.

Today around the world, dozens of agencies are participating in a "Tweet-A-Thon". What this means is that Departments will tweet about every call they are getting/responding to for a certain amount of time!
 
Using the hashtag #POLTWT Agencies are working to show the public how they are utilizing social media.
 
There is a town near me that actually is live-tweeting AND has a live-feed camera in one of their cruisers! 
 
Here is the link to the Live Feed (Scroll down)
http://www.wellesleypolice.com/index.cfm?pid=10237&cdid=11616
and their twitter accountL
@wellesleyPolice
 
Hope you enjoy!!

I was on Facebook the other day, and noticed one of my friends posted a link to this. This is so hilarious. What they did was they added voices to the animal's movements. You have to watch it.
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQ1HKCYJM5U
 
Here is the original. I am afraid the link may break in a few days though, So I put a similar one above.
 
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=4060075429353&set=vb.198914640188934&type=2&theater
 

Against my better judgement i'm going to put my two cents in.
1. I feel the cop COMPLETELY had every right to shot the dog. While it is very sad, Human(or "homo-sapiens") life takes priority.
2. The taser idea.
  A. As far as i saw no officer had a taser.
  B. While yes it could of detoured the dog, it could of just  made the dog even madder.
  C. Taser are made to take down human that are ether stopped or slowly moving. While it is possible to hit a fast moving target it would take longer and more luck/skill.
  D. If the officer was to miss with he taser he could hit one of the bystanders.
3. The officer was not moving toward the downed person as far as i can tell, He appears to be moving to control the crowd(Such as the woman Who was nearly bit.)
4. The woman, The dog shows aggression toward her as it tried to bit her but only got her pants. Ether way we cant prove weather the dog missed or was warning her.
5. Some say he put people in danger by shooting but he really didn't not till after he shot and went into a defensive posture. If you watch he brings The pistol form the hosteler always pointing at the ground, therefore not putting and bystanders at risk. That is the way EVERYONE that has gun training is trained to do.
 
If I missed any points I would be happy to show my point of view. And as JAM said lets keep this polite.

Against my better judgement i'm going to put my two cents in.
1. I feel the cop COMPLETELY had every right to shot the dog. While it is very sad, Human(or "homo-sapiens") life takes priority.
2. The taser idea.
  A. As far as i saw no officer had a taser.
  B. While yes it could of detoured the dog, it could of just  made the dog even madder.
  C. Taser are made to take down human that are ether stopped or slowly moving. While it is possible to hit a fast moving target it would take longer and more luck/skill.
  D. If the officer was to miss with he taser he could hit one of the bystanders.
3. The officer was not moving toward the downed person as far as i can tell, He appears to be moving to control the crowd(Such as the woman Who was nearly bit.)
4. The woman, The dog shows aggression toward her as it tried to bit her but only got her pants. Ether way we cant prove weather the dog missed or was warning her.
5. Some say he put people in danger by shooting but he really didn't not till after he shot and went into a defensive posture. If you watch he brings The pistol form the hosteler always pointing at the ground, therefore not putting and bystanders at risk. That is the way EVERYONE that has gun training is trained to do.
 
If I missed any points I would be happy to show my point of view. And as JAM said lets keep this polite.

It's just January but this is already one of the most ridiculous things i've read in 2013

Against my better judgement i'm going to put my two cents in.
1. I feel the cop COMPLETELY had every right to shot the dog. While it is very sad, Human(or "homo-sapiens") life takes priority.
2. The taser idea.
  A. As far as i saw no officer had a taser.
  B. While yes it could of detoured the dog, it could of just  made the dog even madder.
  C. Taser are made to take down human that are ether stopped or slowly moving. While it is possible to hit a fast moving target it would take longer and more luck/skill.
  D. If the officer was to miss with he taser he could hit one of the bystanders.
3. The officer was not moving toward the downed person as far as i can tell, He appears to be moving to control the crowd(Such as the woman Who was nearly bit.)
4. The woman, The dog shows aggression toward her as it tried to bit her but only got her pants. Ether way we cant prove weather the dog missed or was warning her.
5. Some say he put people in danger by shooting but he really didn't not till after he shot and went into a defensive posture. If you watch he brings The pistol form the hosteler always pointing at the ground, therefore not putting and bystanders at risk. That is the way EVERYONE that has gun training is trained to do.
 
If I missed any points I would be happy to show my point of view. And as JAM said lets keep this polite.

Whoa, wait, I'm sorry what? It seems that you're annoyed/angry at the fact that some people disprove/disagree with your opinion and instead of bringing up a valid argument to disprove their views, you start attempting to insult other members? Yeah that doesn't work here. Many of our members are here to just simply enjoy our modification (such as c13) and are open to debates like this (Who have openly stated they are against Police Officers in some of their actions) and they choose to involve themselves in debates like this because they have their own opinion, and when another person disagrees 90% of the time they will be open to their views instead of replying with attempted derogatory remarks/statements.  If you feel this site is so radically in favor of something that you dislike/disagree with so much then you're free leave this site at anytime. And believe me none of us will stop you when you talk to us like that.
 
    I will state that I can some what understand what point you're trying to get across, you want to discuss such things on a site that you feel isn't "Obsessed' with the main view that is in question, hence you feel that they'll always be on the side of what the site is focused on (which by the way is the reason why forums are created, to center around a certain thing and discuss about it) but truthfully you won't get that anywhere. Everyone has their own likes/dislikes and no matter what some one will always disagree with what you have to say, it's part of the world, and you speaking to us like that isn't going to help you any more to get your point across.
 
    This topic has been perfectly fine so far and I HAVE been watching this thread, no flaming, just basic debate. But then you decide to attempt to throw in a derogatory remark/insult to not only the entire site and what it stands for, but also to all our members. I will not tolerate such instigation of flaming, and this goes for all of you (You have been warned). Any posts that are hinting towards being insults/flames towards other members (simply to aggravate them, debate is as always allowed) will be hidden by our staff, this is mainly a site for a game that is Rated M for mature (People over the age of 17), let's all try and act like it shall we?

Thats the irony. Dog, human beings' faithful friend from the beginning of time, even long before the word "Police" was born, is paying for its faithfulness. Wild animals like wolves are safe in woods, dogs followed humans in cities and chose to live there with them, and hence are killed more than wolves, either getting run over on the roads or by getting shot by the same creatures who tame them. They don't get rewarded for protecting them, instead have weaker and slower departments to protect them. Are animal right activists as swift as human rights' ones? Do Vets have enough Life support ambulances with all the necessary equipment like its in case with normal "911" EMS ambulances? Nope.And to those who think it was justified to shoot the dog which didn't even bite the bystander, God you guys are obsessed with cops! I'd rather discuss this on some Camaro-fanboy forum than on a website which is purely based around the police community with so many wannabe cops as members.

THere's no excessive force, the dog just attempted to bite a citizen, then went after one of the cops. The cops did the correct thing as the dog presented a threat to the safety of themselves and the public.

A fun patrol is starting up in a few minutes.
Head over to the LCPDFR TS and drop into the A51D channel if you wanna play :)