Jump to content


Testing Team
  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


c13 last won the day on August 16 2014

c13 had the most liked content!

About c13

  • Rank
  • Birthday 07/29/1996

Profile Information

  • Country
    United States
  • Location
    Dimension C-137
  • Gender

Staff List

  • Staff Title
    Retired Community Moderator

Recent Profile Visitors

30,370 profile views
  1. While it isn't necessarily handguns, it is fairly LE weapons related. Do you think you could talk to Jridah about making an M4 or an HK416 fully compatible with the MKII weapons, with some common law enforcement attachments? I would like to have an M4 with different optics to add variety to agencies when the next LSPDFR comes out.
  2. Beach

    Are you not planning on adding the dash light to the newer chargers? Either way I'm excited for another real life pack
  3. Egypt Mosque Attatck

    The problems are the human rights violations. Again, whenever a country has a majority of its people practicing Islam, Islam becomes the primary religion by law. Again, Sharia Law is the end goal of Islam. The whole point I have been making is that Sharia Law is implemented when a country has a populace that primarily worships Islam. Laws can be changed pretty easily once a majority of the population feels a certain way. The problem is that Islam is fundamentally incompatible with the constitution because it explicitly goes against beliefs such as freedom of religion and equality. Christianity has adapted to the times, but Islam hasn't.
  4. Egypt Mosque Attatck

    Except we can ban something here and prevent it from bringing its problems over here. History has shown that when a country's primary religion becomes Islam, Sharia Law is implemented. So we should accept a religion that is most likely violent and at the very least commits blatant human rights violations on a daily basis because if we don't, they will attack us? You talk about how it's funny that 2nd amendment supporters don't care about the constitution when it comes to this issue, I find it funny that your side doesn't care about blatant human rights violations as long as it's done under a religion that is seen as persecuted. And again, what country that practices Sharia Law would you like to live in? Key phrase there:"that doesn't have Islam as its main religion"
  5. Egypt Mosque Attatck

    Again, every Muslim-Majority country practices Sharia Law. Sharia Law completely contradicts the Constitution. It completely contradicts basic human rights, such as freedom of religion, education, equality among genders, equality among races. Anyone who isn't a devout Muslim in a country that practices Sharia Law is a 2nd class citizen, and half of the Muslim population might as well be a 3rd class citizen. Women can't receive an education. Women can't own property. Saudi Arabia just recently started allowing women to drive, and that's a far more progressive country than most that practice Sharia Law. People who are openly Homosexuals get imprisoned or executed. If a woman goes some where unescorted by a man and gets raped, SHE gets stoned to death for adultery. Islam isn't just a religion, it's a form of government.
  6. Egypt Mosque Attatck

    Because the Bill of Rights is ultimately the most rights any government has ever granted its people. The entire goal of Islam is to implement Sharia Law worldwide. Name one Islamic country you would like to live in. The only ones with decent standards of living are deplorable for human rights, including other religions, minorities and women.
  7. LSPDFR 0.4 - Epic Customization

    How much of the backup menu is changed with the new version? Also, would it be possible to choose in game whether they respond with guns out or not? I want standard patrol officers to have long guns available, but I don't want to call for backup on a traffic stop and have them arrive with M4s out.
  8. Again, you are ignoring one of the most important thoughts in my argument. Not everyone can fight off an attacker, and an attacker doesn't always stop at money or valuable items. A small woman would find it incredibly hard if not impossible fight off an average sized male. An elderly man who broke a bone the last time he fell down couldn't use a baseball bat to any measure of effectiveness. I know it's a life we are talking about, but I am talking about lives that have no value to an attacker. I put the value of the life of a law abiding citizen over some one who is actively hurting people for personal gain in his/her life. Your solution is bashing some one's head in with a baseball bat. That seems like a much more violent way to go than being shot, and blunt force trauma is the cause of death in thousands of homicides a year in the United States. The courts won't decide what decision you make before you make it. And again, what if an attacker(s) has an advantage on you? I'm not a religious man, the quote was there solely to demonstrate my point that firearms are an equalizer and a tool for self defense.
  9. There's been no confusion up to this point. We have always been talking about mass shooters. But since you lost that argument and want to change the subject, we are now talking about anyone who intends to cause harm to the innocent, physically or monetarily. You don't know that a home invader is only there to rob stuff. Most likely, if they come at night, they expect people to be there, and are fully willing to commit violence. If some one forcibly enters my home, they do not have good intentions. Your problem is that you assume everyone lives by the concepts of your imaginary world, and that no one wants to hurt you. They don't care about you buddy. What many of you people refuse to understand is that not everyone is equal. An average career criminal has been in prison multiple times, fighting his whole life and leaves prison in amazing shape. An average male rarely works out. Then we talk about other potential victims- women, the elderly, children. A majority of robbers work in teams, because it's hard to carry a TV out by yourself. So now we have multiple attackers in good shape against people already at a disadvantage in a one-on-one struggle for life. Being shot at scares the shit out of them and makes them run. My state has a concept called Castle Law. Legally speaking, they recognize it is my natural right to kill anyone who forcibly enters my home, because some one who does that has no good intentions. I fully plan on exercising that right if I need to. And I live in the safest county in the state, so it's far from the wild west you imagine it to be. God may have created man, but Samuel Colt made them equal.
  10. A shooter wants nothing but the maximum body count. He doesn't care about you, your husband or your family, and he definitely doesn't give a damn about a jury of his peers. The only solution is putting an end to his violent intentions as fast as possible, whether that is subduing him at gunpoint or shooting him. The fact that you equate equal force in self defense with a cold blooded killing because you don't trust yourself says everything about you. Would you rather have a shooter kill 2 people and be killed himself by a citizen defending him/herself, or wait for police to arrive after 12 people have been killed? The answer is obvious to anyone who cares about humanity. Talk to anyone in an infantry unit. They aren't bloodthirsty psychopaths, they are people looking to achieve a purpose of destroying the country's enemies since they trained their entire career for that moment. When they get back home, a vast majority are well rounded again, and tears shed are almost exclusively for lost comrades.
  11. The problem with your entire premise is that it is inherently flawed. As humans, we are a tribal society. We work to advance the human race as a whole in the way we see best. Whether it is making scientific discoveries that improve longevity, cultivating food for nourishment, or adding numbers to our population so that they may advance the tribe should we not be able to. Part of being in that tribe is defending it at all costs, especially those closest to you. If you are out with family, and some one starts opening fire and hitting people near you, there is no question whether he is guilty or not. Humanity has always had to fight predators seeking to destroy it-bears, saber-toothed tigers or wolves. Unfortunately, as technology advances the most dangerous threat to our survival we face is our fellow man. When defending this tribe, it is not about taking life. It is about saving it. The moment some one kills innocents, he/she lowers himself from humanity. Ending that threat immediately, instead of waiting for him/her to run out of the means or enjoyment to continue, saves lives. That is a fact that can't be argued. Not only does it save the lives of those immediately there, it saves lives down the road. People that would've been parents. A doctor. A police officer. Some one who might make a major scientific discovery that moves us into the next age. Tell me, if someone you cared about was caught up in one of these horrible acts, would you want someone to step in to save them by taking out the attacker? This is why your argument is asinine to 10s of millions of Americans. When lives are at stake in the immediate moment, there is no time to wait for police or a judiciary process. A threat has to be taken out ASAP to save lives. If you truly believe that a wolf attacking your fellow man shouldn't be stopped, then you don't belong in the tribe. The world is a scary place, and scary men are needed in order to protect your comfort.
  12. Not really on topic or what I was getting at, just that the idea that there aren't units who go to war filled with glee is laughable.
  13. You're telling me a shooter like the one in Parkland will go through the judiciary system to decide if he should kill people or not? Just look at Sutherland Springs. A bystander grabbed a rifle and stepped in, putting an end to the shooters rampage. A shooter with more guns, ammo, and who was most likely on his way to another target. A legally armed law abiding citizen stepped in, effectively engaged the shooter, and kept him at gunpoint for 7 minutes before police arrived to take over for him. The entire point of training is to make the act of taking a human life not only meaningless, but thoughtless. The only thoughts that should be running through a soldiers head when being engaged are on how to effectively eliminate the threat with the least friendly casualties possible. Any thought on justification or the value of human life is reserved until after they are in safety, the only thought in their heads is making sure their brothers returns to their family. The mindset of infantry units is incredibly different from soft-skills, which are almost like civilians in comparison. Every time they go out the wire they are praying some one is dumb enough to shoot at them. The ones who don't have this mindset are taken off the line as quickly as possible. I'm not saying there are not mental issues after the fact, just that it is something you don't worry about when you are in theater.
  14. What "works" is that nearly every single time one of these shooters is confronted by someone with a gun, they give up or kill themselves. The problem with your whole "try it out" theory is that it was tried out. It was tried out with the Assault Weapons Ban of 94-04, and it had no discernible effect. Lets say we try something along the lines of turning all guns in, I doubt that the 2nd amendment would be restored, regardless if the ban works or not. The 2nd amendment is part of multiple contingency plans the founding fathers put in place. Some of those include the trust in the military to put the people before the government, the freedom of speech to speak out against the government in order to prevent a tyrannical government from arising, and finally the 2nd amendment as a last resort.
  15. FIB HRT Uniform - EUP Texture Mod

    Those are regional FBI SWAT teams. HRT uses multicam:

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.